Jennifer Barsky Reese1,2, Jennifer A Haythornthwaite3. 1. Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA. jennifer.reese@fccc.edu. 2. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA. jennifer.reese@fccc.edu. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5510 Nathan Shock Dr., Suite 100, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The primary objectives were (1) to examine the importance of sexuality within the self-view and cross-sectional correlates for 120 colorectal cancer patients and (2) to determine whether the importance of sexuality changed for 46 colorectal cancer patients and partners participating in an intimacy enhancement intervention. METHODS: Two newly developed items assessed importance of sexuality within the self-view (1) currently and (2) before cancer; a calculated change score assessed perceived change. In the cross-sectional sample, associations between importance of sexuality and demographic and medical factors and sexual function status were examined. Intervention participants' importance ratings before and after participation were used to calculate effect sizes. RESULTS: For patients, importance of sexuality before cancer was greater (M = 65.7) than current importance (M = 56.8, p = .001). Greater current importance of sexuality was associated with partnered status, non-metastatic disease, and not being in treatment. Scoring in the sexually functional range was associated with greater current importance of sexuality for men and a smaller perceived change in importance for both men and women (p values <.05). Sexual function status also significantly predicted current importance independent of covariates. Small to medium effect sizes for intervention patients (.37) and partners (.60) were found for increases in importance of sexuality. Items showed evidence of test-retest reliability and construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: Coping with sexual concerns is important to those affected by colorectal cancer. Findings suggest that the importance of sexuality can decrease through colorectal cancer and associated sexual problems and can increase through participating in an intimacy-focused intervention.
PURPOSE: The primary objectives were (1) to examine the importance of sexuality within the self-view and cross-sectional correlates for 120 colorectal cancerpatients and (2) to determine whether the importance of sexuality changed for 46 colorectal cancerpatients and partners participating in an intimacy enhancement intervention. METHODS: Two newly developed items assessed importance of sexuality within the self-view (1) currently and (2) before cancer; a calculated change score assessed perceived change. In the cross-sectional sample, associations between importance of sexuality and demographic and medical factors and sexual function status were examined. Intervention participants' importance ratings before and after participation were used to calculate effect sizes. RESULTS: For patients, importance of sexuality before cancer was greater (M = 65.7) than current importance (M = 56.8, p = .001). Greater current importance of sexuality was associated with partnered status, non-metastatic disease, and not being in treatment. Scoring in the sexually functional range was associated with greater current importance of sexuality for men and a smaller perceived change in importance for both men and women (p values <.05). Sexual function status also significantly predicted current importance independent of covariates. Small to medium effect sizes for intervention patients (.37) and partners (.60) were found for increases in importance of sexuality. Items showed evidence of test-retest reliability and construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: Coping with sexual concerns is important to those affected by colorectal cancer. Findings suggest that the importance of sexuality can decrease through colorectal cancer and associated sexual problems and can increase through participating in an intimacy-focused intervention.
Entities:
Keywords:
Colorectal cancer; Coping; Self-concept; Sexual function; Sexuality
Authors: Justine J Speer; Bruce Hillenberg; Dennis P Sugrue; Charla Blacker; Cynthia L Kresge; Veronica B Decker; Dana Zakalik; David A Decker Journal: Breast J Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Joseph M Herman; Amol K Narang; Kent A Griffith; Mark M Zalupski; Jennifer B Reese; Susan L Gearhart; Nolifer S Azad; June Chan; Leah Olsen; Jonathan E Efron; Theodore S Lawrence; Edgar Ben-Josef Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jane M Ussher; Janette Perz; Andrew Kellett; Suzanne Chambers; David Latini; Ian D Davis; Duncan Rose; Gary W Dowsett; Scott Williams Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Marjan J Traa; Ricardo G Orsini; Brenda L Den Oudsten; Jolanda De Vries; Jan A Roukema; Sietske J Bosman; Ralph L Dudink; Harm J T Rutten Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Giovanna M da Silva; Tracy Hull; Patricia L Roberts; Dan E Ruiz; Steven D Wexner; Eric G Weiss; Juan J Nogueras; Norma Daniel; Jane Bast; Jeff Hammel; Dana Sands Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Kathrin Milbury; Lorenzo Cohen; Rosell Jenkins; John M Skibber; Leslie R Schover Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jennifer Barsky Reese; Kristen Sorice; Mary Catherine Beach; Laura S Porter; James A Tulsky; Mary B Daly; Stephen J Lepore Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Kathryn E Flynn; Li Lin; Deborah Watkins Bruner; Jill M Cyranowski; Elizabeth A Hahn; Diana D Jeffery; Jennifer Barsky Reese; Bryce B Reeve; Rebecca A Shelby; Kevin P Weinfurt Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 3.802