Literature DB >> 27219855

Assessment of SRM, MRM(3) , and DIA for the targeted analysis of phosphorylation dynamics in non-small cell lung cancer.

Thierry Schmidlin1, Luc Garrigues1, Catherine S Lane2, T Celine Mulder1, Sander van Doorn1, Harm Post1, Erik L de Graaf1,3, Simone Lemeer1, Albert J R Heck1, A F Maarten Altelaar1.   

Abstract

Hypothesis-driven MS-based targeted proteomics has gained great popularity in a relatively short timespan. Next to the widely established selected reaction monitoring (SRM) workflow, data-independent acquisition (DIA), also referred to as sequential window acquisition of all theoretical spectra (SWATH) was introduced as a high-throughput targeted proteomics method. DIA facilitates increased proteome coverage, however, does not yet reach the sensitivity obtained with SRM. Therefore, a well-informed method selection is crucial for designing a successful targeted proteomics experiment. This is especially the case when targeting less conventional peptides such as those that contain PTMs, as these peptides do not always adhere to the optimal fragmentation considerations for targeted assays. Here, we provide insight into the performance of DIA, SRM, and MRM cubed (MRM(3) ) in the analysis of phosphorylation dynamics throughout the phosphoinositide 3-kinase mechanistic target of rapamycin (PI3K-mTOR) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling network. We observe indeed that DIA is less sensitive when compared to SRM, however demonstrates increased flexibility, by postanalysis selection of alternative phosphopeptide precursors. Additionally, we demonstrate the added benefit of MRM(3) , allowing the quantification of two poorly accessible phosphosites. In total, targeted proteomics enabled the quantification of 42 PI3K-mTOR and MAPK phosphosites, gaining a so far unachieved in-depth view mTOR signaling events linked to tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in non-small cell lung cancer.
© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data-independent acquisition; MRM3; Protein phosphorylation; Quantitative proteomics; Selected reaction monitoring; Technology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27219855     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  20 in total

1.  Proteomics and Schizophrenia: The Evolution of a Great Partnership.

Authors:  Bradley J Smith; Victor C Carregari; Daniel Martins-de-Souza
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 2.  Clinical applications of quantitative proteomics using targeted and untargeted data-independent acquisition techniques.

Authors:  Jesse G Meyer; Birgit Schilling
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 3.  Application of targeted mass spectrometry in bottom-up proteomics for systems biology research.

Authors:  Nathan P Manes; Aleksandra Nita-Lazar
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Ion Activation Methods for Peptides and Proteins.

Authors:  Luis A Macias; Inês C Santos; Jennifer S Brodbelt
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  High-Density, Targeted Monitoring of Tyrosine Phosphorylation Reveals Activated Signaling Networks in Human Tumors.

Authors:  Lauren E Stopfer; Cameron T Flower; Aaron S Gajadhar; Bhavin Patel; Sebastien Gallien; Daniel Lopez-Ferrer; Forest M White
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 13.312

Review 6.  Quantitative proteomics in lung cancer.

Authors:  Chantal Hoi Yin Cheung; Hsueh-Fen Juan
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 8.410

7.  The whole transcriptome and proteome changes in the early stage of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yanfei Li; Cuiping Wang; Tingting Li; Linlin Ma; Fangzhou Fan; Yueling Jin; Junwei Shen
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2019-03-04

8.  Quantitative Phosphoproteomic Analysis Reveals Key Mechanisms of Cellular Proliferation in Liver Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Bo Zhu; Quanze He; Jingjing Xiang; Fang Qi; Hao Cai; Jun Mao; Chunhua Zhang; Qin Zhang; Haibo Li; Lu Lu; Ting Wang; Wenbo Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Data-independent acquisition-based SWATH-MS for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial.

Authors:  Christina Ludwig; Ludovic Gillet; George Rosenberger; Sabine Amon; Ben C Collins; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 11.429

Review 10.  Phosphopeptide Fragmentation and Site Localization by Mass Spectrometry: An Update.

Authors:  Clement M Potel; Simone Lemeer; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.