Literature DB >> 27219667

SPECTRAL DOMAIN-OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IMAGE CONTRAST AND BACKGROUND COLOR SETTINGS INFLUENCE IDENTIFICATION OF RETINAL STRUCTURES.

Camille V Palma1, Ruchita Amin, Wolfgang Huf, Ferdinand Schlanitz, Katharina Eibenberger, Lee M Jampol, Marion R Munk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate image contrast and color setting on assessment of retinal structures and morphology in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
METHODS: Two hundred and forty-eight Spectralis spectral-domain optical coherence tomography B-scans of 62 patients were analyzed by 4 readers. B-scans were extracted in 4 settings: W + N = white background with black image at normal contrast 9; W + H = white background with black image at maximum contrast 16; B + N = black background with white image at normal contrast 12; B + H = black background with white image at maximum contrast 16. Readers analyzed the images to identify morphologic features. Interreader correlation was calculated. Differences between Fleiss-kappa correlation coefficients were examined using bootstrap method. Any setting with significantly higher correlation coefficient was deemed superior for evaluating specific features.
RESULTS: Correlation coefficients differed among settings. No single setting was superior for all respective spectral-domain optical coherence tomography parameters (P = 0.3773). Some variables showed no differences among settings. Hard exudates and subretinal fluid were best seen with B + H (κ = 0.46, P = 0.0237 and κ = 0.78, P = 0.002). Microaneurysms were best seen with W + N (κ = 0.56, P = 0.025). Vitreomacular interface, enhanced transmission signal, and epiretinal membrane were best identified using all color/contrast settings together (κ = 0.44, P = 0.042, κ = 0.57, P = 0.01, and κ = 0.62, P ≤ 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Contrast and background affect the evaluation of retinal structures on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images. No single setting was superior for all features, though certain changes were best seen with specific settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27219667     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  3 in total

1.  OCT-angiography: A qualitative and quantitative comparison of 4 OCT-A devices.

Authors:  Marion R Munk; Helena Giannakaki-Zimmermann; Lieselotte Berger; Wolfgang Huf; Andreas Ebneter; Sebastian Wolf; Martin S Zinkernagel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Comparison of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Six Different Settings and With Customized Automated Segmentation Software.

Authors:  Helena Giannakaki-Zimmermann; Wolfgang Huf; Karen B Schaal; Kaspar Schürch; Chantal Dysli; Muriel Dysli; Anita Zenger; Lala Ceklic; Carlos Ciller; Stephanos Apostolopoulos; Sandro De Zanet; Raphael Sznitman; Andreas Ebneter; Martin S Zinkernagel; Sebastian Wolf; Marion R Munk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Automatically Enhanced OCT Scans of the Retina: A proof of concept study.

Authors:  Sandro De Zanet; Marion R Munk; Stefanos Apostolopoulos; Jazmín Salas; José L P Ordóñez; Shern Shiou Tan; Carlos Ciller; Andreas Ebneter; Martin Zinkernagel; Raphael Sznitman; Sebastian Wolf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.