Leslie E Mueller1, Leila A Haidari2, Angela R Wateska3, Roslyn J Phillips3, Michelle M Schmitz3, Diana L Connor3, Bryan A Norman4, Shawn T Brown5, Joel S Welling5, Bruce Y Lee6. 1. Public Health Computational and Operations Research (PHICOR), Pittsburgh, PA, USA (formerly) and Baltimore, MD, USA (currently); Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Public Health Computational and Operations Research (PHICOR), Pittsburgh, PA, USA (formerly) and Baltimore, MD, USA (currently); Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (PSC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3. Public Health Computational and Operations Research (PHICOR), Pittsburgh, PA, USA (formerly) and Baltimore, MD, USA (currently). 4. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (PSC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 6. Public Health Computational and Operations Research (PHICOR), Pittsburgh, PA, USA (formerly) and Baltimore, MD, USA (currently); Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: brucelee@jhu.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential impact and value of applications (e.g. adjusting ordering levels, storage capacity, transportation capacity, distribution frequency) of data from demand forecasting systems implemented in a lower-income country's vaccine supply chain with different levels of population change to urban areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using our software, HERMES, we generated a detailed discrete event simulation model of Niger's entire vaccine supply chain, including every refrigerator, freezer, transport, personnel, vaccine, cost, and location. We represented the introduction of a demand forecasting system to adjust vaccine ordering that could be implemented with increasing delivery frequencies and/or additions of cold chain equipment (storage and/or transportation) across the supply chain during varying degrees of population movement. RESULTS: Implementing demand forecasting system with increased storage and transport frequency increased the number of successfully administered vaccine doses and lowered the logistics cost per dose up to 34%. Implementing demand forecasting system without storage/transport increases actually decreased vaccine availability in certain circumstances. DISCUSSION: The potential maximum gains of a demand forecasting system may only be realized if the system is implemented to both augment the supply chain cold storage and transportation. Implementation may have some impact but, in certain circumstances, may hurt delivery. Therefore, implementation of demand forecasting systems with additional storage and transport may be the better approach. Significant decreases in the logistics cost per dose with more administered vaccines support investment in these forecasting systems. CONCLUSION: Demand forecasting systems have the potential to greatly improve vaccine demand fulfilment, and decrease logistics cost/dose when implemented with storage and transportation increases. Simulation modeling can demonstrate the potential health and economic benefits of supply chain improvements.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential impact and value of applications (e.g. adjusting ordering levels, storage capacity, transportation capacity, distribution frequency) of data from demand forecasting systems implemented in a lower-income country's vaccine supply chain with different levels of population change to urban areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using our software, HERMES, we generated a detailed discrete event simulation model of Niger's entire vaccine supply chain, including every refrigerator, freezer, transport, personnel, vaccine, cost, and location. We represented the introduction of a demand forecasting system to adjust vaccine ordering that could be implemented with increasing delivery frequencies and/or additions of cold chain equipment (storage and/or transportation) across the supply chain during varying degrees of population movement. RESULTS: Implementing demand forecasting system with increased storage and transport frequency increased the number of successfully administered vaccine doses and lowered the logistics cost per dose up to 34%. Implementing demand forecasting system without storage/transport increases actually decreased vaccine availability in certain circumstances. DISCUSSION: The potential maximum gains of a demand forecasting system may only be realized if the system is implemented to both augment the supply chain cold storage and transportation. Implementation may have some impact but, in certain circumstances, may hurt delivery. Therefore, implementation of demand forecasting systems with additional storage and transport may be the better approach. Significant decreases in the logistics cost per dose with more administered vaccines support investment in these forecasting systems. CONCLUSION: Demand forecasting systems have the potential to greatly improve vaccine demand fulfilment, and decrease logistics cost/dose when implemented with storage and transportation increases. Simulation modeling can demonstrate the potential health and economic benefits of supply chain improvements.
Authors: Chet N Chaulagai; Christon M Moyo; Jaap Koot; Humphrey B M Moyo; Thokozani C Sambakunsi; Ferdinand M Khunga; Patrick D Naphini Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2005-09-02 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Tina-Marie Assi; Korngamon Rookkapan; Jayant Rajgopal; Vorasith Sornsrivichai; Shawn T Brown; Joel S Welling; Bryan A Norman; Diana L Connor; Sheng-I Chen; Rachel B Slayton; Yongjua Laosiritaworn; Angela R Wateska; Stephen R Wisniewski; Bruce Y Lee Journal: Vaccine Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Bruce Y Lee; Brigid E Cakouros; Tina-Marie Assi; Diana L Connor; Joel Welling; Souleymane Kone; Ali Djibo; Angela R Wateska; Lionel Pierre; Shawn T Brown Journal: Vaccine Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Bruce Y Lee; Tina-Marie Assi; Korngamon Rookkapan; Diana L Connor; Jayant Rajgopal; Vorasith Sornsrivichai; Shawn T Brown; Joel S Welling; Bryan A Norman; Sheng-I Chen; Rachel R Bailey; Ann E Wiringa; Angela R Wateska; Anirban Jana; Willem G Van Panhuis; Donald S Burke Journal: Vaccine Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Ashly D Black; Josip Car; Claudia Pagliari; Chantelle Anandan; Kathrin Cresswell; Tomislav Bokun; Brian McKinstry; Rob Procter; Azeem Majeed; Aziz Sheikh Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Tina-Marie Assi; Shawn T Brown; Ali Djibo; Bryan A Norman; Jayant Rajgopal; Joel S Welling; Sheng-I Chen; Rachel R Bailey; Souleymane Kone; Hailu Kenea; Diana L Connor; Angela R Wateska; Anirban Jana; Stephen R Wisniewski; Willem G Van Panhuis; Donald S Burke; Bruce Y Lee Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Leila A Haidari; Diana L Connor; Angela R Wateska; Shawn T Brown; Leslie E Mueller; Bryan A Norman; Michelle M Schmitz; Proma Paul; Jayant Rajgopal; Joel S Welling; Jim Leonard; Sheng-I Chen; Bruce Y Lee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sarah N Cox; Patrick T Wedlock; Sarah W Pallas; Elizabeth A Mitgang; Tatenda T Yemeke; Sarah M Bartsch; Taiwo Abimbola; Sheryl S Sigemund; Aaron Wallace; Sachiko Ozawa; Bruce Y Lee Journal: Vaccine Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 3.641