Literature DB >> 27219325

Correction: Impact on Patients' Treatment Outcomes of XpertMTB/RIF Implementation for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis: Follow-Up of a Stepped-Wedge Randomized Clinical Trial.

Anete Trajman, Betina Durovni, Valeria Saraceni, Alexandre Menezes, Marcelo Cordeiro-Santos, Frank Cobelens, Susan Van den Hof.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123252.].

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27219325      PMCID: PMC4878764          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


There are a number of errors in the “aOR (95%CI)” columns for Tables 3 and 4. During secondary analysis, the authors observed 128 duplicate entries in the study database among 4054 included in the analyses. Despite observing the random distribution of duplicates, the authors performed all analyses again after removal of the 128 duplicates (leaving 3926 patients in the analyses) and found negligible effect on the outcome measures: aOR for arm associated with unfavourable outcome now 0.93 (0.80–1.09) compared to 0.93 (0.79–1.08) in the original article; while aOR for TB-attributed deaths is 0.69 (0.46–1.04) compared to 0.65 (0.44–0.97). Even though the 95% confidence interval of the aOR for TB attributed death now includes 1, the difference with the originally reported aOR and the width of its confidence interval are minimal, hence the conclusions from the results remain unchanged. Please see the correct Tables 3 and 4 here.
Table 3

Characteristics associated with unfavourable outcomes in a multilevel logistic regression model

CharacteristicsUnfavourable (n = 1181)Successful (n = 2745)crude OR (95%CI)aOR (95%CI)
Sex
Male846 (33.2%)1700 (66.8%)1.5 (1.3–1.8)1.5 (1.3–1.8)
Female335 (24.3%)1045 (75.7%)1 (reference)1 (reference)
Age group (years)
0–1418 (19.8%)73 (80.2%)0.76 (0.44–1.32)0.69 (0.39–1.3)
15–29704 (33.8%)1378 (66.2%)1.6 (1.3–2.0)1.6 (1.2–2.0)
30–59347 (26.9%)943 (73.1%)1.1 (0.90–1.5)1.1 (0.86–1.4)
≥60112 (24.2%)351 (75.8%)1 (reference)1 (reference)
HIV status
Negative452 (21.2%)1675 (78.8%)1 (reference)1 (reference)
Positive171 (43.7%)220 (56.3%)2.9 (2.3–3.7)3.1 (2.4–3.9)
Unknown558 (39.6%)850 (60.4%)2.6 (2.2–3.0)2.6 (2.2–3.0)
City
Manaus222 (28.5%)556 (71.5%)1 (reference)1 (reference)
Rio959 (30.5%)2189 (69.5%)1.1 (0.81–1.4)1.3 (1.01–1.7)
Type of diagnosis
Confirmed*875 (30.9%)1960 (69.1%)1 (reference)1 (reference)
Clinically diagnosed, negative test§198 (28.5%)496 (71.5%)0.89 (0.73–1.1)0.86 (0.71–1.04)
Clinically diagnosed, no test result108 (27.2%)289 (72.8%)0.82 (0.65–1.04)0.76 (0.59–0.97)
Arm
Baseline556 (31.3%)1221 (68.7%)1 (reference)1 (reference)
Intervention625 (29.1%)1524 (70.9%)0.92 (0.79–1.06)0.93 (0.80–1.09)

*Positive smear in baseline arm and positive Xpert in intervention arm.

§Negative smear in baseline arm and negative Xpert in intervention arm.

†Unfavourable = loss to follow up, death from any cause, transfer out and resistance.

Table 4

Characteristics associated with TB-attributed death in a multilevel logistic regression model

CharacteristicsTB-attributed death (n = 119)Successful (n = 2745)crude OR (95%CI)aOR (95%CI)
Sex
Male83 (4.7%)1700 (95.3%)1.4 (0.95–2.1)-
Female36 (3.3%)1045 (96.7%)1.0 (reference)
Age group (years)
0–141 (1.3%)73 (98.7%)0.20 (0.03–1.6)0.14 (0.02–1.01)
15–2949 (3.4%)1378 (96.6%)0.54 (0.33–0.9)0.44 (0.26–0.76)
30–5946 (4.6%)943 (95.4%)0.74 (0.44–1.2)0.57 (0.33–0.98)
≥6023 (6.1%)351 (93.9%)1.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)
HIV status
Negative25 (1.5%)1675 (98.5%)1.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)
Positive44 (16.7%)220 (83.3%)14.0 (8.1–24.2)16.1 (9.2–28.3)
Unknown50 (5.6%)850 (94.4%)4.1 (2.4–6.7)4.3 (2.6–7.1)
City
Manaus21 (3.6%)556 (96.4%)1.2 (0.73–1.9)1.96 (1.01–3.8)
Rio98 (4.3%)2189 (95.7%)1.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)
Type of diagnosis
Confirmed*81 (4.0%)1960 (96.0%)1.0 (reference)
Clinically diagnosed, negative test§25 (4.8%)496 (95.2%)1.2 (0.77–1.9)-
Clinically diagnosed, no test result13 (4.3%)289 (95.7%)1.1 (0.59–2.0)
Arm
Baseline68 (5.3%)1221 (94.7%)1.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)
Intervention51 (3.2%)1524 (96.8%)0.60 (0.42–0.85)0.69 (0.46–1.04)

OR = odds ratio, aOR = adjusted odds ratio

*Positive smear in baseline arm and positive Xpert in intervention arm

§ Negative smear in baseline arm and negative Xpert in intervention arm

*Positive smear in baseline arm and positive Xpert in intervention arm. §Negative smear in baseline arm and negative Xpert in intervention arm. †Unfavourable = loss to follow up, death from any cause, transfer out and resistance. OR = odds ratio, aOR = adjusted odds ratio *Positive smear in baseline arm and positive Xpert in intervention arm § Negative smear in baseline arm and negative Xpert in intervention arm
  1 in total

1.  Impact on Patients' Treatment Outcomes of XpertMTB/RIF Implementation for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis: Follow-Up of a Stepped-Wedge Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Anete Trajman; Betina Durovni; Valeria Saraceni; Alexandre Menezes; Marcelo Cordeiro-Santos; Frank Cobelens; Susan Van den Hof
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  Randomization-based inference for a marginal treatment effect in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Dustin J Rabideau; Rui Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.497

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.