Literature DB >> 27219237

Modified Furlow Palatoplasty Using Small Double-Opposing Z-Plasty: Surgical Technique and Outcome.

Kazuaki Yamaguchi1, Daniel Lonic, Che-Hsiung Lee, Claudia Yun, Lun-Jou Lo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A smaller Z-plasty is applied in a modified Furlow palatoplasty. The purpose of this study was to assess its surgical and functional outcome.
METHODS: The surgical technique included mucoperiosteal flap elevation in the hard palate, complete pedicle dissection and release, double-opposing Z-plasty using 5-mm limbs and muscle dissection in the soft palate, and the buccal fat pad covering lateral relaxing wounds. A retrospective chart review was conducted for 231 consecutive nonsyndromic patients undergoing modified palatoplasty from May of 2007 to December of 2014. The demographic, postoperative, and follow-up data were collected. Statistical analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Average age at palatoplasty was 8.3 months. The overall oronasal fistula rate was 0.4 percent; oronasal fistula occurred in only one case with bilateral cleft. Other complications included postoperative bleeding in two cases (0.8 percent), postoperative airway obstruction in one case (0.4 percent), obstructive sleep apnea in one case (0.4 percent), stitch abscess in one case (0.4 percent), and distal uvula dehiscence in two cases (0.8 percent). One hundred twenty-seven patients had full speech evaluation, and seven (5.5 percent) were diagnosed with velopharyngeal insufficiency requiring surgical correction.
CONCLUSION: This modified palatoplasty using a small double-opposing Z-plasty provided adequate cleft palate closure, with a low fistula rate and satisfactory speech outcome. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27219237     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  Morphology of the Musculus Uvulae In Vivo Using MRI and 3D Modeling Among Adults With Normal Anatomy and Preliminary Comparisons to Cleft Palate Anatomy.

Authors:  Jamie L Perry; Joshua Y Chen; Katelyn J Kotlarek; Abigail Haenssler; Bradley P Sutton; David P Kuehn; Thomas J Sitzman; Xiangming Fang
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2019-02-20

2.  A Preliminary Study of Anatomical Changes Following the Use of a Pedicled Buccal Fat Pad Flap During Primary Palatoplasty.

Authors:  Katelyn J Kotlarek; Michael S Jaskolka; Xiangming Fang; Charles Ellis; Silvia S Blemker; Bruce Horswell; Paul Kloostra; Jamie L Perry
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2021-05-11

3.  Nasal Duplication Combined with Cleft Lip and Palate: Surgical Correction and Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Kanharith Long; Kazuaki Yamaguchi; Daniel Lonic; Vanna Long; Vuthy Chhoeurn; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-10-20

4.  Utilization of pedicled buccal fat pads for coverage of the lateral relaxing wound: A review of literature and a case series of 15 patients.

Authors:  Muhammad Ruslin; Andi S Hajrah-Yusuf; Andi Tajrin; Lun-Jou Lo; Tymour Forouzanfar
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-05-01

5.  Modified double-opposing Z-plasty for patients with Veau I cleft palate: Are lateral relaxing incisions necessary?

Authors:  Hyung Joon Seo; Rafael Denadai; Dax Carlo Go Pascasio; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Square-root Palatoplasty: Comparing a Novel Modified-Furlow Double-opposing Z-palatoplasty Technique to Traditional Straight-line Repair.

Authors:  Shoichiro A Tanaka; Demetrius M Coombs; Fatma B Tuncer; Alexander Shikhman; Patricia Keenan; Neil L McNinch; Ananth S Murthy
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-08-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.