Literature DB >> 27218861

Importance of Esophageal Manometry and pH Monitoring in the Evaluation of Patients with Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Multicenter Study.

Ciro Andolfi1, Luigi Bonavina2, Robert T Kavitt3, Vani J A Konda3, Emanuele Asti2, Marco G Patti1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients who have heartburn are treated with acid-reducing medications on the assumption that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is causing the symptom. In the absence of a response to therapy, patients are often assumed to have refractory GERD, and they are referred for laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS), often without further diagnostic evaluation. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that (1) in some patients with refractory GERD, the heartburn is not secondary to reflux, but rather to stasis and fermentation of food in the presence of achalasia and (2) esophageal manometry and pH monitoring are essential to establish proper diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred twenty-four patients, whose final diagnosis was achalasia, were referred to two quaternary care centers. Symptomatic evaluation, barium swallow, endoscopy, manometry, and pH monitoring were performed in all patients.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two patients (29%) had been treated with acid-reducing medications for an average of 29.3 months, and were referred for LARS because of lack of response to medical therapy. One patient had already been treated with a Nissen fundoplication. All patients were diagnosed with achalasia and underwent Heller myotomy and partial fundoplication.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that (1) one-third of achalasia patients complained of heartburn and (2) patients with heartburn not responding to medical treatment must be carefully evaluated before referral to surgery. These data confirm the importance of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring in any patient considered for LARS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27218861     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  7 in total

Review 1.  Paraesophageal Hernia and Reflux Prevention: Is One Fundoplication Better than the Other?

Authors:  Ciro Andolfi; Alejandro Plana; Sara Furno; Piero Marco Fisichella
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Minor psychiatric disorders and objective diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Rafael Melillo Laurino Neto; Fernando A M Herbella; Andre Zugman; Vic Velanovich; Beth Montera; Francisco Schlottmann; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  P Marco Fisichella; Ciro Andolfi; George Orthopoulos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Amit Patel; Robert J Wong; Rena H Yadlapati
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 12.045

Review 5.  Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Piero Marco Fisichella; Francisco Schlottmann; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-23

Review 6.  Surgical management of achalasia.

Authors:  Kamil Nurczyk; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-05-25

7.  High-Pressure Tactics: Jackhammer Esophagus-Diagnosing Is Easier than Treating.

Authors:  Pamela Milito; Stefano Siboni; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 3.487

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.