| Literature DB >> 27218086 |
Caio Nery1, Michael Coughlin2, Daniel Baumfeld3, Fernando Raduan1, Tania Szejnfeld Mann1, Fernanda Catena1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To find the best clinical parameters for defining and classifying the degree of plantar plate injuries.Entities:
Keywords: Acquired foot deformities; Hammer toe syndrome; Metatarsophalangeal joint
Year: 2015 PMID: 27218086 PMCID: PMC4868080 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.10.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Fig. 1Hamilton–Thompson metatarsophalangeal “drawer test”: G0, stable joint; G1, mild instability (subluxation < 50%); G2, moderate instability (subluxation > 50%); G3, severe instability (capacity for joint dislocation); G4, dislocated joint.
Clinical staging system for instability of the MTP joints.
| Grade 0 – MTP aligned; prodromic stage with pain, but no deformity | Joint pain in MTP; thickening or edema of the MTP joint; diminished plantar grip; negative drawer test |
| Grade | Pain in the MTP joints; joint swelling; diminished plantar grip; mildly positive “drawer test” (subluxation < 50%) |
| Grade | Joint pain; not much edema; negative plantar grip; moderately positive “drawer test” (subluxation > 50%) |
| Grade | Pain in joints and feet; not much swelling; negative plantar grip; very positive drawer (MTP joints dislocated); flexible toe clawing |
| Grade | Pain in joints and feet; little or no swelling; negative plantar grip; MTP joint dislocated; fixed toe clawing |
Clinical parameters used in this study.
| Type | Parameter |
|---|---|
| History | Acute pain at outset of condition |
| Sports-related trauma | |
| Use of high heels | |
| Feeling of local edema | |
| Physical examination | Increase in space between toes |
| Touching the ground | |
| Pain on plantar palpation of the corresponding metatarsal head | |
| Positive “drawer test” | |
| Negative plantar grip | |
| Mulder's sign | |
| Displacement of toe |
Grading of Hamilton–Thompson test: G0 = stable joint; G1 = mild instability (subluxation < 50%); G2 = moderate instability (subluxation > 50%); G3 = severe instability (capacity for joint dislocation); G4 = dislocated joint.
Bouche's plantar grip test: 0 = absent; 1 = diminished; 2 = normal.
Displacement of toe according to the planes: axial (varus/valgus); frontal (supination/pronation); sagittal (dorsal/plantar); combined–crossover toe.
Anatomical grading of plantar plate injuries.
| Grade | Injury patterns |
|---|---|
| 0 | Attenuation and/or capsular discoloration of the plantar plate |
| 1 | Distal transverse lesion (adjacent to insertion); proximal phalanx (<50%); medial/lateral/central area and/or intrasubstantial lesion (<50%) |
| 2 | Distal transverse lesion (>50%); medial/lateral/central area and/or intrasubstantial lesion (>50%) |
| 3 | Transverse lesion and/or extensive longitudinal lesion (may involve collateral ligaments) |
| 4 | Extensive lesion in “buttonhole” shape (displacement); combination of transverse and longitudinal plate injuries |
Clinical history parameters according to injury grades.
| History | Grade (plantar plate injury) | Total ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 ( | ||||||
| No | 10 (43.5%) | 4 (33.3%) | 3 (20.0%) | 3 (9.1%) | 11 (64.7%) | 31 (31.0%) |
| Yes | 13 (56.5%) | 8 (66.7%) | 12 (80.0%) | 30 (90.9%) | 6 (35.3%) | 69 (69.0%) |
| | 0.0005 | |||||
| No | 18 (78.3%) | 10 (83.3%) | 11 (73.3%) | 29 (87.9%) | 16 (94.1%) | 84 (84.0%) |
| Yes | 5 (21.7%) | 2 (16.7%) | 4 (26.7%) | 4 (12.1%) | 1 (5.9%) | 16 (16.0%) |
| | 0.4546 | |||||
| No | 9 (39.1%) | 2 (16.7%) | 7 (46.7%) | 11 (33.3%) | 9 (52.9%) | 38 (38.0%) |
| Yes | 14 (60.9%) | 10 (83.3%) | 8 (53.3%) | 22 (66.7%) | 8 (47.1%) | 62 (62.0%) |
| | 0.2910 | |||||
| No | 18 (78.3%) | 5 (41.7%) | 9 (60.0%) | 17 (51.5%) | 13 (76.5%) | 62 (62.0%) |
| Yes | 5 (21.7%) | 7 (58.3%) | 6 (40.0%) | 16 (48.5%) | 4 (23.5%) | 38 (38.0%) |
| | 0.0927 | |||||
Physical examination parameters according to anatomical grade of plantar plate injuries.
| Physical examination parameters | Grade (Plantar plate injury) | Total ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 ( | ||||||
| Absent | 8 (34.8%) | 5 (41.7%) | 3 (20.0%) | 7 (22.2%) | 0 (0%) | 23 (23.0%) |
| Present | 15 (65.2%) | 7 (58.3%) | 12 (80.0%) | 26 (78.8%) | 17 (100%) | 77 (77.0%) |
| | 0.0127 | |||||
| Negative | 9 (39.1%) | 6 (50.0%) | 14 (93.3%) | 32 (97.0%) | 16 (94.1%) | 77 (77.0%) |
| Positive | 14 (60.9%) | 6 (50.0%) | 1 (6.7%) | 1 (3.0%) | 1 (5.9%) | 23 (23.0%) |
| | <0.0001 | |||||
| Absent | 1 (4.3%) | 2 (16.7%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (9.1%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (6.0%) |
| Present | 22 (95.7%) | 10 (83.3%) | 15 (100%) | 30 (90.9%) | 17 (100%) | 94 (94.0%) |
| | 0.1814 | |||||
| “ | ||||||
| | 23 (100%) | 11 (71.6%) | 49(60.0%) | 15(35.4%) | 0 (0%) | 58 (58.0%) |
| | 0 (0%) | 1 (8.3%) | 6 (40.0%) | 14 (42.4%) | 6 (35.3%) | 27 (27.0%) |
| | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (12.1%) | 5 (29.4%) | 9 (9.0%) |
| | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (35.3%) | 6 (6.0%) |
| | <0.0001 | |||||
| Absent | 10 (43.5%) | 10 (83.3%) | 14 (93.3%) | 32 (97.0%) | 15 (88.2%) | 81 (81.0%) |
| Diminished | 11 (47.8%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (11.0%) |
| Normal | 2 (8.7%) | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (6.7%) | 1 (3.0%) | 2 (11.8%) | 8 (8.0%) |
| | <0.0001 | |||||
| Present | 5 (21.7%) | 3 (25.0%) | 4 (26.7%) | 9 (27.3%) | 5 (29.4%) | 26 (26.0%) |
| Absent | 18 (78.3%) | 9 (75.0%) | 11 (73.3%) | 24 (72.7%) | 12 (70.6%) | 74 (74.0%) |
| | 0.9854 | |||||
Fig. 2Podoscopic views of two patients who were included in our study. A, touching the ground with all the smaller toes; B, second and third toes negative for touching the ground.
Fig. 3Plantar grip of the toes.
Deformities of the smaller toes.
| Deformities of the smaller toes | Grade (Plantar plate injury) | Total ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 ( | ||||||
| Absent | 8 (34.8%) | 2 (16.7%) | 3 (20.0%) | 2 (6.1%) | 1 (5.9%) | 16 (16.0%) |
| Present | 15 (65.2%) | 10 (83.3%) | 12 (80.0%) | 31 (93.9%) | 16 (94.1%) | 84 (84.0%) |
| | 0.0459 | |||||
| Absent | 5 (21.7%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (6.7%) | 1 (3.0%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (7.0%) |
| Present | 18 (78.3%) | 12 (100%) | 14 (93.3%) | 32 (97.0%) | 17 (100%) | 93 (93.0%) |
| | 0.0352 | |||||
| Absent | 13 (56.5%) | 2 (16.7%) | 4 (26.7%) | 3 (9.1%) | 1 (5.9%) | 23 (23.0%) |
| Present | 10 (43.5%) | 10 (83.3%) | 11 (73.3%) | 30 (90.9%) | 16 (94.1%) | 77 (77.0%) |
| | 0.0004 | |||||
| Absent | 23 (100%) | 12 (100%) | 15 (100%) | 29 (87.9%) | 17 (100%) | 96 (96.0%) |
| Present | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (12.1%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (4.0%) |
| | 0.0560 | |||||
| Absent | 23 (100%) | 12 (100%) | 11 (73.3%) | 21 (63.6%) | 4 (23.5%) | 71 (71.0%) |
| Present | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (26.7%) | 12 (36.4%) | 13 (76.5%) | 29 (29.0%) |
| | <0.0001 | |||||
Fig. 4Different degrees of deformity of crossover toe.
Summary of the statistically significant results relating to each parameter studied.
| Parameter | Incidence % | Grade (Plantar plate injury) | Statistical significance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | |||||||
| “Drawer test” | 100 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2/3 | 3/4 | High |
| Pain in metatarsal head | 94 | – | – | – | – | – | Non-significant |
| Dorsal elevation of toe | 93 | √ | – | – | – | – | Low |
| Plantar grip | 92 | √ | – | – | – | – | High |
| Varus/valgus | 84 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | Low |
| Widening of space | 77 | – | – | √ | √ | √ | Low |
| Touching the ground | 77 | – | – | √ | √ | √ | High |
| Crossover | 77 | – | – | – | √ | √ | High |
| Acute pain | 69 | √ | √ | High | |||
| High-heeled shoes | 62 | – | – | – | – | – | Non-significant |
| Local edema | 38 | – | – | – | – | – | Non-significant |
| Supination of toe | 29 | – | – | √ | √ | √ | High |
| Mulder's sign | 26 | – | – | – | – | – | Non-significant |
| Sports trauma | 16 | – | – | – | – | – | Non-significant |