Literature DB >> 27217588

Incidence and Risk Factors of Major Complications in Brachioplasty: Analysis of 2,294 Patients.

Lyly Nguyen1, Varun Gupta1, Ashkan Afshari1, R Bruce Shack1, James C Grotting1, K Kye Higdon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brachioplasty is a popular procedure to correct upper arm ptosis. However, current literature on complications and risk factors is scant and inconclusive.
OBJECTIVES: Using a large, prospective, multicenter database, we report the incidence of major complications and risk factors in patients undergoing brachioplasty.
METHODS: Patients who underwent brachioplasty between 2008 and 2013 were identified from the CosmetAssure (Birmingham, AL) database. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major complication(s), defined as complications requiring emergency room visit, hospital admission, or reoperation within 30 days of the procedure. Risk factors including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes, combined procedures, and type of surgical facility were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Within the 129,007 patients enrolled in CosmetAssure, 2294 (1.8%) underwent brachioplasty. Brachioplasty patients were more likely to be older than 50 years (50.1%), obese (36.3%), diabetic (5.5%), but less likely smokers (5.5%). Major complications occurred in 3.4% brachioplasties with infection (1.7%) and hematoma (1.1%) being most common. Combined procedures, performed in 66.8% cases, had a complication rate of 4.4%, in comparison to 1.3% for brachioplasties performed alone. Combined procedures (RR = 3.58), males (RR = 3.44), and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2) (RR = 1.92) were identified as independent risk factors for the occurrence of any complication. Combined procedures (RR = 12.42), and the male gender (RR = 8.89) increased the risk of hematoma formation.
CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates from brachioplasty are much lower than previously reported. Hematoma and infection are the most common major complications. Combined procedures, male gender, and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2) are independent risk factors for complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2: Risk.
© 2016 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27217588     DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjv267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  5 in total

1.  The Association Between Metabolic Derangement and Wound Complications in Elective Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Amanda R Sergesketter; Yisong Geng; Ronnie L Shammas; Gerald V Denis; Robin Bachelder; Scott T Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.417

2.  Association of Diabetes Mellitus With Postoperative Complications and Mortality After Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xiaoying Zhang; Aisheng Hou; Jiangbei Cao; Yanhong Liu; Jingsheng Lou; Hao Li; Yulong Ma; Yuxiang Song; Weidong Mi; Jing Liu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 6.055

3.  Body Contouring in Massive Weight Loss Patients Receiving Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christine Yin; Phoebe B McAuliffe; Jocellie E Marquez; Christopher D Liao; Vasileios Vasilakis; Jewel Estrella; Nicos Labropoulos; Sami U Khan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-08-13

4.  American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgical Facilities (AAAASF) History: Its Role in Plastic Surgery Safety.

Authors:  Robert Singer; Geoffrey R Keyes; Foad Nahai
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2019-04-02

Review 5.  Avoidance and Correction of Deformities in Body Contouring.

Authors:  Andrew M Ferry; Edward Chamata; Rami P Dibbs; Norman H Rappaport
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.314

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.