Hilde Perdok1, Suze Jans2, Corine Verhoeven3, Jeroen van Dillen4, Ronald Batenburg5, Ben Willem Mol6, François Schellevis7, Ank de Jonge8. 1. Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO(+) Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: H.perdok@vumc.nl. 2. Department of Community Genetics at the EMGO(+) Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Royal Dutch Organisation of Midwives, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: sjans@knov.nl. 3. Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO(+) Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands. Electronic address: C.verhoeven@vumc.nl. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc) Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: jeroen.vandillen1@radboudumc.nl. 5. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), The Netherlands. Electronic address: R.Batenburg@nivel.nl. 6. Robinson Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. Electronic address: ben.mol@adelaide.edu.au. 7. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), The Netherlands; Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO(+) Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: F.schellevis@nivel.nl. 8. Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO(+) Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: J.dejonge1@vumc.nl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: the current division between midwife-led and obstetrician-led care creates fragmentation in maternity care in the Netherlands. This study aims to gain insight into the level of consensus among maternity care professionals about facilitators and barriers related to integration of midwife-led and obstetrician-led care. Integration could result in more personal continuity of care for women who are referred during labour. This may lead to better birth experiences, fewer interventions and better outcomes for both mother and infant. DESIGN: a descriptive study using a questionnaire survey of 300 primary care midwives, 100 clinical midwives and 942 obstetricians. SETTING: the Netherlands in 2013. PARTICIPANTS: 131 (response 44%) primary care midwives, 51 (response 51%) clinical midwives and 242 (response 25%) obstetricians completed the questionnaire. FINDINGS: there was consensus about the clinical midwife caring for labouring women at moderate risk of complications. Although primary care midwives themselves were willing to expand their tasks there was no consensus among respondents on the tasks and responsibilities of the primary care midwife. Professionals agreed on the importance of good collaboration between professionals who should work together as a team. Respondents also agreed that there are conflicting interests related to the payment structure, which are a potential barrier for integrating maternity care. KEY CONCLUSIONS: this study shows that professionals are positive regarding an integrated maternity care system but primary care midwives, clinical midwives and obstetricians have different opinions about the specifications and implementation of this system. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: our findings are in accordance with earlier research, showing that it is too early to design a blueprint for an integrated maternity care model in the Netherlands. To bring about change in the maternity care system, an implementation strategy should be chosen that accounts for differences in interests and opinions between professionals.
OBJECTIVE: the current division between midwife-led and obstetrician-led care creates fragmentation in maternity care in the Netherlands. This study aims to gain insight into the level of consensus among maternity care professionals about facilitators and barriers related to integration of midwife-led and obstetrician-led care. Integration could result in more personal continuity of care for women who are referred during labour. This may lead to better birth experiences, fewer interventions and better outcomes for both mother and infant. DESIGN: a descriptive study using a questionnaire survey of 300 primary care midwives, 100 clinical midwives and 942 obstetricians. SETTING: the Netherlands in 2013. PARTICIPANTS: 131 (response 44%) primary care midwives, 51 (response 51%) clinical midwives and 242 (response 25%) obstetricians completed the questionnaire. FINDINGS: there was consensus about the clinical midwife caring for labouring women at moderate risk of complications. Although primary care midwives themselves were willing to expand their tasks there was no consensus among respondents on the tasks and responsibilities of the primary care midwife. Professionals agreed on the importance of good collaboration between professionals who should work together as a team. Respondents also agreed that there are conflicting interests related to the payment structure, which are a potential barrier for integrating maternity care. KEY CONCLUSIONS: this study shows that professionals are positive regarding an integrated maternity care system but primary care midwives, clinical midwives and obstetricians have different opinions about the specifications and implementation of this system. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: our findings are in accordance with earlier research, showing that it is too early to design a blueprint for an integrated maternity care model in the Netherlands. To bring about change in the maternity care system, an implementation strategy should be chosen that accounts for differences in interests and opinions between professionals.
Authors: Bahareh Goodarzi; Corine Verhoeven; Durk Berks; Eline F de Vries; Ank de Jonge Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 3.390