Myrthe J C S Peelen1, Brenda M Kazemier1, Anita C J Ravelli2, Christianne J M De Groot3, Joris A M Van Der Post1, Ben W J Mol4, Petra J Hajenius1, Marjolein Kok1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 4. The Robinson Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, The South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Fetal gender is associated with preterm birth; however, a proper subdivision by onset of labor and corresponding neonatal outcome by week of gestation is lacking. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from the Netherlands Perinatal Registry (1999-2010) were used to calculate relative risk ratios for gender by week of gestation and gender-related risk on adverse neonatal outcomes using a moving average technique. White European women with an alive fetus at onset of labor were included. Adverse neonatal outcomes were defined as neonatal mortality and a composite of neonatal morbidity. Onset of labor was categorized as spontaneous onset with intact membranes, premature rupture of membranes, and induction or elective cesarean section. RESULTS: The study population comprised 1 736 615 singleton deliveries (25(+0) -42(+6) weeks). Male fetuses were at increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth with intact membranes compared with a female fetus with a peak between 27 and 31 weeks [relative risk (RR) 1.5; 95% CI 1.4-1.6]. Male fetuses were also at increased risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes between 27 and 37 weeks (RR 1.2; 95% CI 1.16-1.23). No gender effect was seen for medically indicated preterm birth. No significant differences were seen for neonatal mortality. Males were at significantly increased risk of composite neonatal morbidity from 29 weeks onwards (RR 1.3; 95% CI 1.3-1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Male fetal gender is a relevant risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth, both for intact membranes and for preterm premature rupture of membranes in white European women. In addition, male infants are at increased risk of neonatal morbidity.
INTRODUCTION: Fetal gender is associated with preterm birth; however, a proper subdivision by onset of labor and corresponding neonatal outcome by week of gestation is lacking. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from the Netherlands Perinatal Registry (1999-2010) were used to calculate relative risk ratios for gender by week of gestation and gender-related risk on adverse neonatal outcomes using a moving average technique. White European women with an alive fetus at onset of labor were included. Adverse neonatal outcomes were defined as neonatal mortality and a composite of neonatal morbidity. Onset of labor was categorized as spontaneous onset with intact membranes, premature rupture of membranes, and induction or elective cesarean section. RESULTS: The study population comprised 1 736 615 singleton deliveries (25(+0) -42(+6) weeks). Male fetuses were at increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth with intact membranes compared with a female fetus with a peak between 27 and 31 weeks [relative risk (RR) 1.5; 95% CI 1.4-1.6]. Male fetuses were also at increased risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes between 27 and 37 weeks (RR 1.2; 95% CI 1.16-1.23). No gender effect was seen for medically indicated preterm birth. No significant differences were seen for neonatal mortality. Males were at significantly increased risk of composite neonatal morbidity from 29 weeks onwards (RR 1.3; 95% CI 1.3-1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Male fetal gender is a relevant risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth, both for intact membranes and for preterm premature rupture of membranes in white European women. In addition, male infants are at increased risk of neonatal morbidity.
Authors: Myrthe J C S Peelen; Brenda M Kazemier; Anita C J Ravelli; Christianne J M de Groot; Joris A M van der Post; Ben W J Mol; Marjolein Kok; Petra J Hajenius Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Stephanie V Wrottesley; Alessandra Prioreschi; Sarah H Kehoe; Kate A Ward; Shane A Norris Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Brandie D Taylor; Roberta B Ness; Mark A Klebanoff; Gong Tang; James M Roberts; David M Hougaard; Kristin Skogstrand; Catherine L Haggerty Journal: Pregnancy Hypertens Date: 2018-02-24 Impact factor: 2.899
Authors: Nika Konrádyová; Kvetoslava Rimárová; Jana Diabelková; Peter Urdzík; Erik Dorko; Štefánia Andraščíková Journal: Cent Eur J Public Health Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 1.154
Authors: Wenwen Jiang; Keshet Ronen; Lusi Osborn; Alison L Drake; Jennifer A Unger; Daniel Matemo; Daniel A Enquobahrie; John Kinuthia; Grace John-Stewart Journal: AIDS Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 4.632
Authors: Alexander J Layden; Marnie Bertolet; W Tony Parks; James M Roberts; Jennifer J Adibi; Janet M Catov Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 10.693
Authors: Anna Suleri; Elisabet Blok; Melisa Durkut; Anna-Sophie Rommel; Lot de Witte; Vincent Jaddoe; Veerle Bergink; Tonya White Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2022-04-02 Impact factor: 19.227
Authors: Edith Brignoni-Pérez; Sarah E Dubner; Michal Ben-Shachar; Shai Berman; Aviv A Mezer; Heidi M Feldman; Katherine E Travis Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 7.400
Authors: Amanda Benavides; Andrew Metzger; Alexander Tereshchenko; Amy Conrad; Edward F Bell; John Spencer; Shannon Ross-Sheehy; Michael Georgieff; Vince Magnotta; Peg Nopoulos Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 3.756