Literature DB >> 27215905

Prevalence and Significance of Unrecognized Renal Dysfunction in Patients with Stroke.

David Pereg1, Zach Rozenbaum2, Dina Vorobeichik3, Nir Shlomo3, Ronit Gilad4, Sivan Bloch5, Morris Mosseri6, David Tanne7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unrecognized renal dysfunction, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the presence of normal serum creatinine levels, is a common comorbidity among patients with various cardiovascular conditions. The current study was aimed to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of unrecognized renal dysfunction in patients with acute stroke.
METHODS: The cohort consisted of patients with acute stroke included in the prospective National Acute Stroke ISraeli (NASIS) registry. Unrecognized renal insufficiency was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the presence of serum creatinine ≤1.2 mg/dL. The 2 primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and the composite of in-hospital mortality or severe disability at hospital discharge.
RESULTS: Of the 7900 patients with stroke included in the study, 5571 (70.5%) had normal renal function, 1510 (19.1%) had recognized renal insufficiency, and 819 (10.4%) had unrecognized renal insufficiency. Mortality rates were higher in patients with recognized and unrecognized renal insufficiency compared with patients with normal renal function (9.9%, 9.1%, and 4.4%, respectively, P < .0001). Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for in-hospital mortality were higher for patients with renal dysfunction recognized (OR, 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-2.7; P < .001) or unrecognized (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2; P = .006) compared with patients with normal renal function. Likewise, adjusted ORs for the composite of in-hospital mortality or severe disability at hospital discharge were higher for patients with renal dysfunction recognized (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; P = .004) or unrecognized (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.01-1.5; P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: Unrecognized renal insufficiency is common among patients with acute stroke and is associated with adverse short-term outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glomerular filtration rate; Mortality; Renal dysfunction; Stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27215905     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  4 in total

Review 1.  Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation: Beyond the CHA2DS2-VASc Score.

Authors:  Pooja S Jagadish; Rajesh Kabra
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Effect of Blood Pressure Variability on Outcomes in Emergency Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Quincy K Tran; Daniel Najafali; Laura Tiffany; Safura Tanveer; Brooke Andersen; Michelle Dawson; Rachel Hausladen; Matthew Jackson; Ann Matta; Jordan Mitchell; Christopher Yum; Diane Kuhn
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-01-12

Review 3.  Stroke risk evaluation for patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights from left atrial appendage.

Authors:  Runxin Fang; Yang Li; Jun Wang; Zidun Wang; John Allen; Chi Keong Ching; Liang Zhong; Zhiyong Li
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-22

Review 4.  Expert opinion paper on cardiac imaging after ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Renate B Schnabel; Stephan Camen; Fabian Knebel; Andreas Hagendorff; Udo Bavendiek; Michael Böhm; Wolfram Doehner; Matthias Endres; Klaus Gröschel; Andreas Goette; Hagen B Huttner; Christoph Jensen; Paulus Kirchhof; Grigorios Korosoglou; Ulrich Laufs; Jan Liman; Caroline Morbach; Darius Günther Nabavi; Tobias Neumann-Haefelin; Waltraud Pfeilschifter; Sven Poli; Timolaos Rizos; Andreas Rolf; Joachim Röther; Wolf Rüdiger Schäbitz; Thorsten Steiner; Götz Thomalla; Rolf Wachter; Karl Georg Haeusler
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.460

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.