Literature DB >> 27215666

Willing but Not Able: Patient and Provider Receptiveness to Addressing Intimate Partner Violence in Johannesburg Antenatal Clinics.

Abigail M Hatcher1,2, Nataly Woollett1, Christina C Pallitto3, Keneoue Mokoatle1, Heidi Stöckl4, Claudia Garcia-Moreno3.   

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy is associated with maternal and infant health. However, in South Africa, where 20% to 35% of pregnant women report experiencing IPV, antenatal care rarely addresses violence. Little research has explored how clinic staff, community members, or pregnant women themselves view IPV. We conducted formative, qualitative research with 48 participants in urban Johannesburg. Focus group discussions with pregnant women ( n = 13) alongside qualitative interviews with health providers ( n = 10), managers and researchers ( n = 10), non-governmental organizations ( n = 6), community leaders ( n = 4), and pregnant abused women ( n = 5) explored the context of IPV and health care response. Data were analyzed using a team approach to thematic coding in NVivo 10. We found that pregnant women in the urban Johannesburg setting experience multiple forms of IPV, but tend not to disclose violence to antenatal care providers. Providers are alert to physical injuries or severe outcomes from IPV, but miss subtler cues, such as emotional distress or signs of poor mental health. Providers are uncertain how to respond to IPV, and noted few existing tools, training, or referral systems. Nevertheless, providers were supportive of addressing IPV, as they noted this as a common condition in this setting. Providers and managers considered the safety and well-being of mother and infant to be a strong rationale for the identification of IPV. Pregnant women were receptive to being asked about violence in a kind and confidential way. Understaffing, insufficient training, and poorly developed referral systems were noted as important health system problems to address in future interventions. South African patients and providers are receptive to the identification of and response to IPV in antenatal care, but require tools and training to be able to safely address violence in the health care setting. Future interventions should consider the urban South African antenatal clinic a supportive, if under-resourced, entry point for improving the health of pregnant women experiencing violence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; cultural contexts; disclosure of domestic violence; domestic violence; mental health and violence; perceptions of domestic violence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27215666     DOI: 10.1177/0886260516651094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interpers Violence        ISSN: 0886-2605


  10 in total

1.  Strengthening Health Systems' Response to Violence Against Women in Three Tertiary Health Facilities of Maharashtra.

Authors:  Shrinivas Gaddappa; Sonali Deshpande; Nandkishor Gaikwad; Jyoti Rokade; Priya Prabhu; Sanjida Arora; Sangeeta Rege
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-11-24

2.  Women's experiences and expectations of intimate partner abuse identification in healthcare settings: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Evangelica Korab-Chandler; Minerva Kyei-Onanjiri; Jacqueline Cameron; Kelsey Hegarty; Laura Tarzia
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  A scoping review of interventions to address intimate partner violence in sub-Saharan African healthcare.

Authors:  Cynthia R Young; Diane M Arnos; Lynn T Matthews
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2019-01-16

4.  Testing a counselling intervention in antenatal care for women experiencing partner violence: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Authors:  Christina Pallitto; Claudia García-Moreno; Heidi Stöeckl; Abigail Hatcher; Catherine MacPhail; Keneoue Mokoatle; Nataly Woollett
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  'It is a difficult topic' - a qualitative study of midwives´ experiences with routine antenatal enquiry for intimate partner violence.

Authors:  L Henriksen; L M Garnweidner-Holme; K K Thorsteinsen; M Lukasse
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Mental ill health in structural pathways to women's experiences of intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Mercilene T Machisa; Nicola Christofides; Rachel Jewkes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Intimate partner violence in Saudi Arabia: A topic of growing interest.

Authors:  Sarah AlJuhani; Mohammed AlAteeq
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-02-28

8.  Facilitators and barriers to routine intimate partner violence screening in antenatal care settings in Uganda.

Authors:  Ronald Anguzu; Laura D Cassidy; Kirsten M M Beyer; Harriet M Babikako; Rebekah J Walker; Julia Dickson-Gomez
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Ethiopian Health Care Workers' Insights into and Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy-A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Bosena Tebeje Gashaw; Berit Schei; Kari Nyheim Solbraekke; Jeanette H Magnus
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Health practitioners' perceptions of structural barriers to the identification of intimate partner abuse: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Naomi Hudspeth; Jacqui Cameron; Surriya Baloch; Laura Tarzia; Kelsey Hegarty
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.