Literature DB >> 27213727

Happy all the time? Affect, resources, and time use.

Suzanne C Segerstrom1, Daniel R Evans1.   

Abstract

When examined at the level of activities, people spend more time in activities associated with more negative affect (NA), suggesting that affect may not influence time use. However, when the normal time frames of activities such as work or eating are considered, people may spend relatively more time in activities they find more enjoyable. The present study examined time use between and within activities, using multilevel models, to further explain time use. Working women (N = 98) reported on time use, affect, and resources associated with 18 different activities using the day reconstruction method. Across activities, higher NA was associated with more time spent in that activity, an effect driven partially by work. However, within activities, higher NA but especially higher positive affect and more resource growth was associated with more time spent in that activity by a particular woman. Individuals who derive more affective and resource value from an activity devote more time to it. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27213727      PMCID: PMC5042806          DOI: 10.1037/emo0000187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  7 in total

1.  Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue.

Authors:  Craig K Enders; Davood Tofighi
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2007-06

2.  On the use of multilevel modeling as an alternative to items analysis in psycholinguistic research.

Authors:  Lawrence Locker; Lesa Hoffman; James A Bovaird
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-11

3.  A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?

Authors:  James A Cranford; Patrick E Shrout; Masumi Iida; Eshkol Rafaeli; Tiffany Yip; Niall Bolger
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-07

4.  A Comparison of Affect Ratings Obtained with Ecological Momentary Assessment and the Day Reconstruction Method.

Authors:  Samantha Dockray; Nina Grant; Arthur A Stone; Daniel Kahneman; Jane Wardle; Andrew Steptoe
Journal:  Soc Indic Res       Date:  2010-11

5.  A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method.

Authors:  Daniel Kahneman; Alan B Krueger; David A Schkade; Norbert Schwarz; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Accounting for the richness of daily activities.

Authors:  Mathew P White; Paul Dolan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-06-22

7.  Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide.

Authors:  Rogier A Kievit; Willem E Frankenhuis; Lourens J Waldorp; Denny Borsboom
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.