BACKGROUND:Digital technology (e-health or 'blended' care), combined with evidence-based face-to-face CBT, is becoming increasingly implemented into mental health care and is expected to result in improved effectiveness and efficiency. AIM: To explore the feasibility of blended CBT for patients with a panic disorder. METHOD: Nine face-to-face sessions of blended CBT (n = 18), supplemented with the digital support of a tabletcomputer and three e-mail contacts, were compared with 12 weekly sessions of regular CBT (n = 18). Primary outcomes were panic frequency and avoidance behaviour; the secondary outcome was general functioning. Patients' experiences of the treatment were collected in the form of a structured interview. RESULTS: The effect sizes found in both the regular and the blended CBT were medium to high (Cohen's d 0.42-1.60). In both types of treatment there was a significant reduction in patients' symptoms. There were no big differences in patient satisfaction regarding the treatment received. The therapists registered 39 face-to-face minutes in the blended treatment but they registered in total 41 fewer face-to-face minutes; this represented a time reduction of 4%. CONCLUSION:Blended CBT with help of a tablet computer seems to be a suitable method for treating panic disorder psychologically, although the time saved is only moderate. Much more research is needed to ascertain the feasibility and the cost effectiveness of blended CBT.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Digital technology (e-health or 'blended' care), combined with evidence-based face-to-face CBT, is becoming increasingly implemented into mental health care and is expected to result in improved effectiveness and efficiency. AIM: To explore the feasibility of blended CBT for patients with a panic disorder. METHOD: Nine face-to-face sessions of blended CBT (n = 18), supplemented with the digital support of a tabletcomputer and three e-mail contacts, were compared with 12 weekly sessions of regular CBT (n = 18). Primary outcomes were panic frequency and avoidance behaviour; the secondary outcome was general functioning. Patients' experiences of the treatment were collected in the form of a structured interview. RESULTS: The effect sizes found in both the regular and the blended CBT were medium to high (Cohen's d 0.42-1.60). In both types of treatment there was a significant reduction in patients' symptoms. There were no big differences in patient satisfaction regarding the treatment received. The therapists registered 39 face-to-face minutes in the blended treatment but they registered in total 41 fewer face-to-face minutes; this represented a time reduction of 4%. CONCLUSION: Blended CBT with help of a tablet computer seems to be a suitable method for treating panic disorder psychologically, although the time saved is only moderate. Much more research is needed to ascertain the feasibility and the cost effectiveness of blended CBT.
Authors: Lutz Siemer; Somaya Ben Allouch; Marcel E Pieterse; Marjolein Brusse-Keizer; Robbert Sanderman; Marloes G Postel Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2020-06-03
Authors: Lutz Siemer; Marjolein Gj Brusse-Keizer; Marloes G Postel; Somaya Ben Allouch; Angelos Patrinopoulos Bougioukas; Robbert Sanderman; Marcel E Pieterse Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Geke Romijn; Neeltje Batelaan; Robin Kok; Jeroen Koning; Anton van Balkom; Nickolai Titov; Heleen Riper Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Lutz Siemer; Marjolein G J Brusse-Keizer; Marloes G Postel; Somaya Ben Allouch; Robbert Sanderman; Marcel E Pieterse Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 5.428