| Literature DB >> 27213404 |
Alexey P Sarapultsev1,2, Oleg N Chupakhin3,4, Petr A Sarapultsev5,6, Larisa P Sidorova7, Tatiana A Tseitler8.
Abstract
SubstitutedEntities:
Keywords: 1,3,4-thiadiazine-2-amines; adrenoblockers; heterocycles; pharmacological evaluation; serotonin; stress; thiadiazines; α-adrenoblockers
Year: 2016 PMID: 27213404 PMCID: PMC4932545 DOI: 10.3390/ph9020027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Figure 1Compound L-17, a 5-phenyl substituted-6H-1,3,4-thiadiazine-2-amine.
Effects of 2-morpholino-5-phenyl-6H-1,3,4-thiadiazine (compound L-17) and Eglonyl on overall exploratory/locomotor activity, fear response, and affective aggression.
| Test Sub. | (Dose mg/kg)/(N of Animals) | Explor/Locomotor Activ. for 10 m, M ± m | Fear Response and Affect Aggr., M ± m | Conventional Units, M ± m | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold, V | Squeak in Points | Decrease in Activity | Catalepsy | Analgesia | |||
| 10/10 | 1.5 ± 0.07 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 30/8 | 2.0 ± 0.05 | 0 | 2.0 ± 0.06 | ||||
| 60/10 | 104 ± 11 * | 43 ± 1.5 * | 0.5 ± 0.05 * | 2.5 ± 0.05 | 0 | 2.5 ± 0.05 | |
| 120/10 | 15 ± 2 * | 48 ± 1.5 * | 0 | 3.0 ± 0.05 | 1.5 ± 0.05 | 3.0 ± 0.05 | |
| 240/10 | 4.0 ± 0.05 | 2.5 ± 0.05 | 3.0 ± 0.02 | ||||
| Saline 0.9% | /20 | 309 ± 26 * | 40 ± 0.8 * | 0.5 ± 0.07 * | |||
| 30 ± 0.8 | 2 ± 0.05 | ||||||
| Eglonil | 10/8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 20/8 | 250 ± 26 | 35 ± 0.5 * | 0.9 ± 0.04 * | 1.0 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | |
| 40/8 | 189 ± 12 * | 38 ± 0.6 * | 0.8 ± 0.05 * | 2.0 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0.8 ± 0.05 | |
| 100/8 | 2.5 ± 0.06 | 1.5 ± 0.07 | 1.0 ± 0.05 | ||||
* Differences vs. control were statistically significant at a p-value < 0.05. The severity of “squeak in points” (the equivalent of an "emotional" fear response) for stimulation with 20 V of electricity; “Threshold, V”—the threshold voltage at which the reaction approximates reactions of animals in the control group.
Changes in apomorphine-induced stereotypy following administration of compound L-17.
| Test Sub. | Dose, mg/kg | Apomorphine (2 mg/kg) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latent Period Duration, sec., M ± m | Stereotyped Behavior Duration, min, M ± m | ED50, mg/kg | LD50/ED50 | ||
| 30 | 55.0 ± 9.8 * | 22.5 ± 1.4 | - | 7.6 | |
| 60 | 67.5 ± 10.3 * | 19.2 ± 1.0 * | 80 | 6.9–8.4 | |
| 120 | 402.5 ± 50.0 * | 5.8 ± 0.9 * | - | - | |
| Saline | 28.3 ± 3.6 | 23.2 ± 0.4 | - | - | |
| Eglonil | 20 | 85 ± 4.7 * | 15.6 ± 1.3 * | 19 | 10.4 |
| 40 | 150 ± 9.3 * | 6.6 ± 0.9 * | 8.9–12.1 | ||
| Saline | 42 ± 7.8 | 31.7 ± 1.8 | |||
* Differences were statistically significant at a p-value < 0.05.
Evaluation of apomorphine-induced hypoactivity following administration of compound L-17.
| Test Sub. | Dose, mg/kg | Motor Activity (Number of Movemets for 5 min), M ± m |
|---|---|---|
| Saline | - | 217.75 ± 17.10 |
| Apomorphine | 75.88 ± 19.33 * | |
| 40 | 26.4 ± 3.8 ** | |
| 60 | 16.50 ± 7.56 ** | |
| Eglonil + Apomorphine (0.15 mg/kg) | 40 | 152.38 ± 12.42 ** |
* Differences were statistically significant at a p-value < 0.05., define; ** differences were statistically significant with apomorphine at dose 0.15 mg/kg.
Results of the amphetamine-induced locomotion test after administration of compound L-17.
| Test Sub. | Dose, mg/kg | Phenaminum (6 mg/kg) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latent Period Duration, sec., M ± m | Stereotyped Behavior Duration, min, M ± m | ED50, mg/kg | LD50/ED50 | ||
| 50 | 247.5 ± 59.5 | 76.5 ± 5.5 | |||
| 100 | 308.3 ± 20.8 | 76.5 ± 5.5 | 170 | 3.5 (3.2–4.0) | |
| 200 | 277.5 ± 25.9 | 60.3 ± 10.0 | |||
| Saline | 185.0 ± 26.4 | 35.5 ± 5.3 | |||
| Eglonil | 20 | 4.2 ± 2.2 | 70.7 ± 2.8 | 25 | 7.9 (6.7–9.2) |
| 40 | 5.2 ± 0.8 | 40.3 ± 1.8 | |||
| Saline | 6.0 ± 1.65 | 118.0 ± 1.2 | |||
* Differences were statistically significant at a p-value < 0.05.
Results of the hexenal tests.
| 60 | 254.0 ± 75.0 | 65.7 ± 8.1 | |||
| 120 | 67.5 ± 4.2 | 96.0 ± 10.0 | 80 | 7.6 (6.9–8.4) | |
| Saline | 126.3 ± 6.4 | 39.3 ± 6.4 | |||
| Eglonil | 20 | 168.0 ± 24.5 | 39.8 ± 1.7 | 42 | 4.7 (4.0–5.5) |
| 40 | 120.3 ± 15.8 | 40.0 ± 0.9 | |||
| Saline | 150.2 ± 10.4 | 25.0 ± 0.8 | |||
| 10 | 110.3 ± 70.8 | 12.8 ± 5.7 | 3/6 | ||
| 20 | 393.0 ± 51.4 | 28.0 ± 6.5 | 5/6 | ||
| 30 | 310.0 ± 95.0 | 24.2 ± 6.7 | 5/6 | ||
| 40 | 354.0 ± 30.2 | 50.2 ± 7.0 | 5/6 | ||
| 120 | 210.8 ± 57.5 | 68.5 ± 8.6 | 6/6 | ||
| Saline | 1–6 | ||||
* Differences were statistically significant at a p-value < 0.05.
The effect of compound L-17 on arecoline-evoked tremor.
| Test Sub. | Dose, mg/kg | Duration of Arecoline-Evoked Tremor, sec., M ± m |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | - | |
| 60 | 14 ± 0.7 | |
| 120 | 14 ± 0.7 | |
| Saline | 24 ± 1.5 | |
| Eglonil | 20 | 15,5 ± 0.5 |
| 40 | 17 ± 0.8 | |
| Saline | 16 ± 0.9 |
* Differences were statistically significant at a p-value < 0.05.
The influence of compound L-17 on the contractile activity of isolated smooth muscles.
| Object | Agonist | Concentr., mol/L | Eglonil | L-17 Compound | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amplitude, mm, M ± m | Diff. to Contr. Values, % | Amplitude, mm, M ± m | Diff. to Contr. Values, % | |||
| Rat seminal vesicles | Epinephrine 1 × 10−5 M | Control | 57 ± 1 | 100 | 65 ± 3.4 | 100 |
| 1 × 10−6 | 44 ± 1.2 | 77 | 58 ± 1.7 | 89 | ||
| Control | 36 ± 2.3 | 100 | 60 ± 1.6 | - | ||
| 1 × 10−5 | 22 ± 1.1 | 61 | 45 ± 2.4 | 75 | ||
| Control | 24 ± 1 | 100 | 67 ± 3.1 | - | ||
| 1 × 10−4 | 7 ± 1.3 | 29 | 23 ± 4.1 | 34 | ||
| Ileum guinea pig | Acetylcholine 1 × 10−5 M | Control | 46 ± 2.3 | 100 | 153 ± 6.3 | 100 |
| 1 × 10−6 | 42 ± 1.5 | 91 | 150 ± 4.2 | 98 | ||
| Control | 40 ± 1.7 | 100 | 150 ± 2.3 | 100 | ||
| 1 × 10−5 | 38 ± 0.8 | 95 | 139 ± 3.1 | 93 | ||
| Control | 37 ± 0.8 | 100 | 143 ± 2.4 | 100 | ||
| 1 × 10−4 | 36 ± 0.9 | 97 | 130 ± 1.3 | 91 | ||
| Ileum guinea pig | Serotonin 1 × 10−6 M | Control | 105 ± 3.5 | 100 | 42 ± 4.5 | 100 |
| 1 × 10−6 | 95 ± 4.0 | 90 | 38 ± 3.2 | 90 | ||
| Control | 132 ± 2.4 | 100 | 46 ± 3.1 | 100 | ||
| 1 × 10−5 | 73 ± 4.1 | 55 | 30 ± 2.4 | 65 | ||
| Control | 61 ± 1.1 | 100 | 38 ± 2.1 | 100 | ||
| 1 × 10−4 | 12 ± 0.8 | 20 | 20 ± 1.2 | 53 | ||
* Differences were statistically significant at a p-value < 0.05.
Figure 2Chemical synthesis of thiadiazine derivatives.