Walter A Bogdanoff1, David Morgenstern2, Marshall Bern3, Beatrix M Ueberheide2, Alicia Sanchez-Fauquier4, Rebecca M DuBois1. 1. Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz , 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California 95064, United States. 2. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine , New York, New York 10016, United States. 3. Protein Metrics , San Carlos, California 94070, United States. 4. Viral Gastroenteritis Unit, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III , Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics targeting cancer, autoimmune diseases, inflammatory diseases, and infectious diseases are growing exponentially. Although numerous panels of mAbs targeting infectious disease agents have been developed, their progression into clinically useful mAbs is often hindered by the lack of sequence information and/or loss of hybridoma cells that produce them. Here we combine the power of crystallography and mass spectrometry to determine the amino acid sequence and glycosylation modification of the Fab fragment of a potent human astrovirus-neutralizing mAb. We used this information to engineer a recombinant antibody single-chain variable fragment that has the same specificity as the parent monoclonal antibody to bind to the astrovirus capsid protein. This antibody can now potentially be developed as a therapeutic and diagnostic agent.
Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics targeting cancer, autoimmune diseases, inflammatory diseases, and infectious diseases are growing exponentially. Although numerous panels of mAbs targeting infectious disease agents have been developed, their progression into clinically useful mAbs is often hindered by the lack of sequence information and/or loss of hybridoma cells that produce them. Here we combine the power of crystallography and mass spectrometry to determine the amino acid sequence and glycosylation modification of the Fab fragment of a potent human astrovirus-neutralizing mAb. We used this information to engineer a recombinant antibody single-chain variable fragment that has the same specificity as the parent monoclonal antibody to bind to the astrovirus capsid protein. This antibody can now potentially be developed as a therapeutic and diagnostic agent.
Entities:
Keywords:
X-ray crystallography; antibody; astrovirus; mass spectrometry; protein engineering; protein sequencing
Human astrovirus (HAstV) is a
leading cause of diarrhea in children and immunocompromised individuals
but not in healthy adults. Currently no vaccines or antiviral therapies
exist for HAstV infections. Several lines of evidence suggest that
antibodies produced by the adaptive immune response are key to protection
against HAstV infection. First, the rarity of HAstV infection in adults
suggests that they have developed a protective adaptive immune response
and, in fact, >75% of healthy adults have anti-HAstV antibodies.[1] Also, clinical studies with healthy volunteers
found that those with more severe HAstV diarrheal disease had no detectable
anti-HAstV antibodies.[2,3] Finally, immunoglobulin therapy
was associated with the recovery of an immune-compromised patient
with severe and persistent HAstV infection.[4] Together, these data suggest that the development of a therapeutic
antibody that neutralizes HAstV could provide a solution to treat
and/or prevent HAstV infection.Only two papers published over
20 years ago describe the isolation of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)
that neutralize HAstV in cell culture.[5,6] These mouse
mAbs bind to the HAstV capsid protein, which forms the T=3 icosahedral
shell surrounding the viral RNA genome.[5−7] In this study, we investigated
one of these mAbs, mAb PL-2, which potently neutralizes HAstV serotype
2 (HAstV-2).[5] We obtained limited amounts
of mAb PL-2 in ascites fluid; however, the hybridoma cells that produce
mAb PL-2 are no longer available. Here, we describe the high-resolution
crystal structure and de novo sequencing of the antigen-binding fragment
(Fab) of mAb PL-2. Having the Fab PL-2 sequence allowed us to “resurrect”
the antibody and engineer a recombinant single-chain variable fragment
(scFv) that we find specifically binds to the HAstV-2 capsid protein.Although de novo sequencing by mass spectrometry and resurrection
of antibodies have been reported before,[8] the case reported here is remarkable in two ways: (1) prior sequence
knowledge—about 95% of the 430 amino acid residues in the Fab
PL-2 were already identified or constrained by X-ray crystallographic
data; and (2) Fab glycosylation—the Fab PL-2 had an unexpected
N-linked glycosylation site. The advanced capabilities of the proteomics
search software Byonic (Protein Metrics Inc.) allowed for the rapid
amino acid sequence determination of Fab PL-2 and characterization
of its glycosylation modifications.
Results
Isolation and
Crystallization of Fab PL-2
The HAstV-2-neutralizing mAb
PL-2 was purified from mouse ascites fluid using Protein A affinity
chromatography. Fab PL-2 fragments were then produced by papain cleavage,
followed by Protein A, anion exchange, and size exclusion chromatography
purification steps. Fab PL-2 crystallized after 2–4 weeks and
formed needle clusters in two different crystallization conditions.
Optimization of Fab PL-2 crystals into crystals suitable for X-ray
crystallography was initially unsuccessful. We turned to a technique
called streak seeding, in which crushed crystal microseeds are used
to nucleate new crystallization drops.[9] We found that streak-seeding successfully promoted rapid growth
of Fab PL-2 crystals within 1–2 days. Surprisingly, we found
that single, three-dimensional crystals were obtained only by cross-seeding,
whereby microseeds from crystals formed in one crystallization condition
are used to nucleate a drop containing a different crystallization
condition.[10]
Crystal Structure Determination
of Fab PL-2
Fab PL-2 crystals diffracted to 1.9-Å resolution,
and the Fab PL-2 structure was solved by molecular replacement (Figure a and Table ). Although we did not have
the sequences of the Fab PL-2 heavy and light chains, the high resolution
of our data allowed us to deduce approximately 90% of the amino acids
using a combination of electron density maps, neighboring amino acid
interactions, and mouse mAb IgG sequence conservation.[11] Problematic amino acids were those that had
ambiguous electron density and no neighboring interactions with other
amino acids. For example, valine and threonine residues had indistinguishable
electron density maps (Figure b,c). Moreover, amino acid 88 in the heavy chain of Fab PL-2
had perplexing electron density that extended beyond the longest amino
acids, and we initially assigned it as lysine (Figure d). To obtain the complete sequence of Fab
PL-2, we turned to de novo protein sequencing by mass spectrometry
(see below). The Fab PL-2 sequence determined by mass spectrometry
was used to finalize the structure of Fab PL-2 (Table ).
Figure 1
Fab PL-2 structure and amino acid sequence interpretation
by X-ray crystallography: (a) Fab PL-2 crystal structure light chain
(red) and heavy chain (blue) with the glycan highlighted in gray;
(b, c) ambiguous electron density where the amino acid could be interpreted
as threonine or valine; (d) lysine fitted in ambiguous electron density
before mass spectrometry; (e) fitting of N-acetyl-d-glucosamine (GlcNAc) into electron density from (d) after
mass spectrometry. The Fab PL-2 structural model and structure factors
have been deposited into the online Protein Data Bank (PDB; www.pdb.org) as PDB entry 5I30.
Table 1
Crystallographic
Data
data collectiona
crystal
Fab PL-2
wavelength (Å)
0.97741
space
group
C2 2 21
a, b, c (Å)
72.22, 170.47, 78.27
α,
β, γ (deg)
90.0, 90.0, 90.0
resolution (Å)
38.79–1.90 (2.00–1.90)
Rmerge
0.112 (0.580)
I/σI
13.20 (3.40)
completeness (%)
98.6 (97.4)
redundancy
6.7 (6.4)
refinement
resolution (Å)
85.24–1.90
no. reflections
35929
Rwork/Rfreeb
0.191/0.219
Ramachandran
(%)
favored
98.33
allowed
1.43
outliers
0.0
rms deviations
bond lengths (Å)
0.006
bond angles
(deg)
0.929
Data were collected from a single crystal. Values for
the highest resolution shell are shown in parentheses.
Rfree was
calculated using 5% of the reflections.
Fab PL-2 structure and amino acid sequence interpretation
by X-ray crystallography: (a) Fab PL-2 crystal structure light chain
(red) and heavy chain (blue) with the glycan highlighted in gray;
(b, c) ambiguous electron density where the amino acid could be interpreted
as threonine or valine; (d) lysine fitted in ambiguous electron density
before mass spectrometry; (e) fitting of N-acetyl-d-glucosamine (GlcNAc) into electron density from (d) after
mass spectrometry. The Fab PL-2 structural model and structure factors
have been deposited into the online Protein Data Bank (PDB; www.pdb.org) as PDB entry 5I30.Data were collected from a single crystal. Values for
the highest resolution shell are shown in parentheses.Rfree was
calculated using 5% of the reflections.
Intact Mass of Fab PL-2
We determined the masses of
the full Fab PL-2 and of the Fab PL-2 heavy and light chains from
mass spectra of intact and reduced Fab PL-2. We achieved isotope resolution
on the Fab PL-2 heavy chain and light chain (Figure ), but not on the full Fab PL-2, although
we identified multiple masses for the intact Fab. The Fab PL-2 heavy
chain showed a number of mass variants in both the MS scans and the
deconvolved spectra (Figure , inset). The mass deltas between variants could be explained
by either glycosylation or N- or C-terminal extensions due to inexact
cleavage by papain. For example, the delta of ∼147 Da between
the most abundant variants could be either fucose or phenylalanine.
Figure 2
Intact
mass analysis of reduced Fab PL-2: MS spectrum of Fab PL-2 light (red)
and heavy chain (blue). Deconvolution of the charge states yields
intact reduced masses of 23 654 Da for the light chain and
25 528 Da for the heavy chain. The heavy chain gives a series
of peaks with mass deltas suggestive of glycosylation; for example,
the difference between the two largest peaks (147 Da) is close to
the mass of fucose (inset).
Intact
mass analysis of reduced Fab PL-2: MS spectrum of Fab PL-2 light (red)
and heavy chain (blue). Deconvolution of the charge states yields
intact reduced masses of 23 654 Da for the light chain and
25 528 Da for the heavy chain. The heavy chain gives a series
of peaks with mass deltas suggestive of glycosylation; for example,
the difference between the two largest peaks (147 Da) is close to
the mass of fucose (inset).
De Novo Sequencing of Fab PL-2
We used four different protease
digestions and high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry to obtain
the full sequence of Fab PL-2. De novo sequencing was accomplished
semiautomatically using Byonic (Protein Metrics Inc.) by iterative
error-tolerant “wild card” (mass deviation allowed on
any amino acid) searches against the current best protein sequence
and manual improvement of the sequence to explain wild card matches.
A final gap in the sequence coverage revolved around peptides that
contained the Fab PL-2 heavy chain amino acid 88, which was also difficult
to identify by electron density maps and was initially assigned as
a lysine. In an effort to fill in the missing sequence, the maximum
wild card mass was increased from 130 Da, sufficient for single amino
acid substitutions, to 500 Da. This search found several wild card
matches to the missing stretch with clear peaks at 204.087, the oxonium
ion for HexNAc, and wild card masses of 189.026 and 335.083, which
are explainable by a single lysine to asparagine substitution (mass
delta, −14.052) and a truncated N-glycan, either HexNAc (203.079)
or HexNAc-Fuc (349.137). Although the intact mass spectra had given
hints that the Fab heavy chain might include glycosylation, the Fab
PL-2 glycosylation was initially identified serendipitously, by observation
of the characteristic monosaccharide HexNAc oxonium ion in a spectrum
with a wild card match to the sequence gap (Figure ). The discovery of a glycosylated asparagine
provided a clear explanation for the electron density map at amino
acid 88 (Figure e).
Merging sequence information from crystallography and mass spectrometry
allowed for the determination of the Fab PL-2 sequence with no ambiguities
(Figure ).
Figure 3
De novo sequencing
via wild card search. Byonic matched the pictured mass spectrum to
MNSLQAK{+189.026}DTGIYYC[+57.021]GR,
where { } indicates a wild card (unidentified) mass delta and
[ ] indicates a known modification, in this case cysteine alkylation.
The peak at 204.086 is the oxonium ion for HexNAc, the nearly universal
mark of a glycopeptide. Manual analysis quickly corrected the peptide
to MNSLQAN[+203.079]DTGIYYC[+57.021]GR,
explaining the peaks at 1218.525, 1289.556, and 1418.607 as ∼y10,
∼y11, and ∼y12 (iso1) with ∼ indicating loss
of the glycan.
Figure 4
Alignment of Fab PL-2
sequences determined by X-ray crystallography (CR) and mass spectrometry
(MS). Highlighted in yellow are amino acids whose identities were
ambiguous in electron density maps. Highlighted in green are amino
acids whose order was ambiguous in mass spectrometry data due to an
absence of fragmentation. Highlighted in red are amino acids that
were incorrect or absent from the sequence determined by X-ray crystallography
but were corrected after mass spectrometry.
De novo sequencing
via wild card search. Byonic matched the pictured mass spectrum to
MNSLQAK{+189.026}DTGIYYC[+57.021]GR,
where { } indicates a wild card (unidentified) mass delta and
[ ] indicates a known modification, in this case cysteine alkylation.
The peak at 204.086 is the oxonium ion for HexNAc, the nearly universal
mark of a glycopeptide. Manual analysis quickly corrected the peptide
to MNSLQAN[+203.079]DTGIYYC[+57.021]GR,
explaining the peaks at 1218.525, 1289.556, and 1418.607 as ∼y10,
∼y11, and ∼y12 (iso1) with ∼ indicating loss
of the glycan.Alignment of Fab PL-2
sequences determined by X-ray crystallography (CR) and mass spectrometry
(MS). Highlighted in yellow are amino acids whose identities were
ambiguous in electron density maps. Highlighted in green are amino
acids whose order was ambiguous in mass spectrometry data due to an
absence of fragmentation. Highlighted in red are amino acids that
were incorrect or absent from the sequence determined by X-ray crystallography
but were corrected after mass spectrometry.
Fab PL-2 Glycosylation Modification Determination
Once glycosylation
was recognized, the Byonic glycopeptide search found approximately
50 other glycoforms of the same peptide, using a glycopeptide search
with a corrected FASTA protein sequence and Byonic’s predefined
glycan database of 309 mammalian N-glycan compositions.
Some glycans are as large as HexNAc(5)Hex(9)Fuc(1) at
2620 Da, which most likely represents a core-fucosylated glycan with
three antennae, each terminating in Gal-α-Gal. Other glycan
compositions, along with manual inspection of characteristic spectrum
peaks, indicate other glycan motifs not usually found in Fc glycosylation,
such as antennal fucosylation and sialylation with either or both
NeuAc and NeuGc. Our results are in agreement with previous reports
that glycans on the Fab can be larger and more varied than those on
the Fc.[12] The distance between Asn87 and
the closest CDR loop is ∼20 Å, suggesting that the glycan
is unlikely to be involved in antigen binding. More likely, the glycan
is involved in Fab stability and solubility.[17]
Engineering of scFv PL-2
Having the Fab PL-2 heavy chain
and light chain amino acid sequences allowed us to engineer a recombinant
antibody construct comprising a single-chain variable fragment (scFv)
of the PL-2 antibody. Our recombinant scFv PL-2 construct is a fusion
protein of the variable regions of the heavy and light chains, connected
by a flexible 20 amino acid linker. We chose to express the scFv using
the Drosophila S2 cell system because
these cells can glycosylate protein and secrete the recombinant scFv
into the growth media.[13] Recombinant scFv
PL-2 was purified by Strep-Tactin affinity chromatography followed
by size exclusion chromatography to isolate the purified, monomeric
form of the scFv (Figure a,b). Overall yields are ∼20 mg of scFv PL-2 per liter
of S2 cells.
Figure 5
Detection of HAstV-2 capsid protein by scFv PL-2. (a)
Reducing SDS-PAGE analysis of purified proteins. Lanes: M, molecular
weight marker; 1, mAb PL-2; 2, scFv PL-2; 3, negative control mAb
NegC. (b) Anti-Strep-tag Western blot detection of scFv PL-2, which
contains a Strep-tag (lane 4). (c) SDS-PAGE (left) and anti-His-tag
Western blot (right) analyses of wheat germ extracts containing recombinant
HAstV-2 capsid protein (C) or wheat germ extract alone (−).
(d) SDS-PAGE (left) and anti-His-tag Western blot (right) analyses
of immunoprecipitation experiments using scFv PL-2 and wheat germ
extracts containing recombinant HAstV-2 capsid protein (C) or wheat
germ extract alone (−). (e) ELISA detection of antibody binding
to HAstV-2 capsid protein. Wells were coated with wheat germ extracts
containing recombinant HAstV-2 capsid protein (+ Capsid) or wheat
germ extract alone (− Capsid). Binding was detected by a HRP-conjugated
goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (for full-length mAbs) or HRP-conjugated
Strep-Tactin (for scFv PL-2). Experiments with mAb PL-2 and scFv PL-2
were performed in triplicate. Due to limited amounts of wheat germ
extract samples, the negative control experiments with mAb NegC or
no primary antibody were performed in duplicate. Error bars represent
the standard deviation.
Detection of HAstV-2 capsid protein by scFv PL-2. (a)
Reducing SDS-PAGE analysis of purified proteins. Lanes: M, molecular
weight marker; 1, mAb PL-2; 2, scFv PL-2; 3, negative control mAb
NegC. (b) Anti-Strep-tag Western blot detection of scFv PL-2, which
contains a Strep-tag (lane 4). (c) SDS-PAGE (left) and anti-His-tag
Western blot (right) analyses of wheat germ extracts containing recombinant
HAstV-2 capsid protein (C) or wheat germ extract alone (−).
(d) SDS-PAGE (left) and anti-His-tag Western blot (right) analyses
of immunoprecipitation experiments using scFv PL-2 and wheat germ
extracts containing recombinant HAstV-2 capsid protein (C) or wheat
germ extract alone (−). (e) ELISA detection of antibody binding
to HAstV-2 capsid protein. Wells were coated with wheat germ extracts
containing recombinant HAstV-2 capsid protein (+ Capsid) or wheat
germ extract alone (− Capsid). Binding was detected by a HRP-conjugated
goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (for full-length mAbs) or HRP-conjugated
Strep-Tactin (for scFv PL-2). Experiments with mAb PL-2 and scFv PL-2
were performed in triplicate. Due to limited amounts of wheat germ
extract samples, the negative control experiments with mAb NegC or
no primary antibody were performed in duplicate. Error bars represent
the standard deviation.
Antigen Recognition by mAb PL-2 and scFv PL-2
mAb PL-2 binds
to the surface of the HAstV-2 virion, which is formed by the virus
capsid protein.[5] To determine if recombinant
scFv PL-2 retains the ability to bind to the HAstV-2 capsid protein,
we first used a wheat germ cell-free protein synthesis system to express
the full-length HAstV-2 capsid protein.[14] Recombinant HAstV-2 capsid protein containing a C-terminal 10-histidine
tag (∼90 kDa) was expressed and remained in the soluble fraction
of the wheat germ extracts (Figure c). Unfortunately, we were unable to purify the recombinant
HAstV-2 capsid protein in sufficient amounts for antibody-binding
studies. Instead, the binding studies described below were performed
with wheat germ extract containing recombinant HAstV-2 capsid protein.To test for scFv PL-2 binding to the HAstV-2 capsid protein, we
first performed an immunoprecipitation experiment using scFv PL-2
immobilized on Strep-Tactin beads (Figure d). The scFv fragment was able to associate
with recombinant HAstV-2 capsid protein and pull it out of the wheat
germ extract. Although the amount of capsid protein was too low to
detect by Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE, an anti-histidine-tag Western
blot detected the presence of the His-tagged HAstV-2 capsid protein.
As a negative control, we performed the immunoprecipitation experiment
with wheat germ extract alone (no HAstV-2 capsid protein), and no
His-tagged proteins were immunoprecipitated (Figure d).To further validate the binding
of scFv PL-2 to the HAstV-2 capsid protein, we performed an enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Figure e). ELISA plates were coated with wheat germ extract
containing recombinant HAstV-2 capsid protein (+ Capsid) or wheat
germ extract alone (− Capsid), and binding by mAb PL-2, a negative
control mAb NegC, or scFv PL-2 was determined. Our experiments reveal
that both mAb PL-2 and scFv PL-2 bind to wheat germ extract containing
recombinant HAstV-2 capsid protein, and no binding was observed to
wheat germ extract alone. Furthermore, no binding was observed by
negative control mAb NegC. Together, these data suggest that recombinant
scFv PL-2 has the same binding specificity as mAb PL-2.
Discussion
In this study, we sought to resurrect the HAstV-neutralizing mAb
PL-2, whose amino acid sequence was unknown. Unfortunately, as is
often the case for mouse mAbs produced decades ago, the hybridoma
cells that produce mAb PL-2 were no longer available for sequencing
of antibody heavy and light chain mRNA transcripts. However, several
milliliters of mAb PL-2 in ascites fluid still existed for further
studies. Here, we determined the Fab PL-2 amino acid sequence and
glycosylation modification by combining X-ray crystallography and
mass spectrometry. Having the Fab PL-2 amino acid sequence allowed
us to produce recombinant scFv PL-2 that retained specificity for
binding to its viral antigen, the HAstV-2 capsid protein. Our ability
to now produce recombinant forms of mAb PL-2 in endless supplies allows
for further characterization of this antibody’s binding-site
epitope and mechanism of HAstV neutralization. Having the mAb PL-2
sequence also allows for its humanization and development into a therapeutic
antibody for the prevention or treatment of HAstV infection.Our studies highlight the recent advancements in de novo protein
sequencing by mass spectrometry. Advances in mass spectrometer instrumentation
enable ultrahigh-resolution studies on challenging, low-abundance,
and high-complexity samples. Equally significant are the advances
in mass spectrometry search algorithms that facilitate rapid de novo
protein sequencing, allowing it to become a routine application. In
this study, we needed only a few days to analyze mass spectrometry
data and determine the Fab PL-2 sequence; however, we concede that
the high degree of prior sequence knowledge by X-ray crystallography
facilitated the de novo sequencing by Byonic’s wild card search.
Nevertheless, in subsequent studies of other antibodies, we have found
that it is quite normal to have >90% identity between an unknown
Fab and the closest Fab sequence in GenBank.An unexpected observation
during the course of this study was the identification of a glycosylation
site in Fab PL-2 at an asparagine in the sequence QANDT between CDRs H2 and H3. The Byonic glycopeptide search found approximately
∼50 glycoforms at this site. In subsequent studies of other
antibodies, we have observed Fab glycosylation at this same site.
Retrospective analyses reveal that ∼20% of mouse and human
mAbs have Fab glycosylation. The germline sequence is QADDT, and because
D → N is one of the most common mutations, this N-glycosylation
site is fairly likely to arise during somatic hypermutation. Little
is known about the role of Fab glycosylation in antigen binding and
autoimmune disease. Recent studies have shown that Fab glycosylation
varies in a similar way as Fc glycosylation (more sialylation, less
bisecting GlcNAc) during pregnancy, when autoimmune diseases generally
go into remission.[15] Furthermore, Fab glycosylation
has been shown to react to certain leukocytes and affect local immune
responses, such as those in the placenta.[16] Only a few therapeutic mAbs include Fab glycosylation; one such
example is cetuximab, a therapeutic mAb with Fab glycosylation at
the homologous sequence QSNDT. Interestingly, engineering of a Fab
glycosylation site into the therapeutic antibody bevacizumab has been
used to mask hydrophobic amino acids, thereby increasing the antibody
stability and decreasing its aggregation.[17]Overall, we hope that our studies encourage other infectious
disease researchers to characterize mAbs that have been isolated in
their laboratories. With advancements in de novo protein sequencing
and recombinant antibody production and engineering, these mAbs can
now be developed into clinically useful diagnostic antibodies and
antimicrobial therapeutic antibodies.
Methods
mAb PL-2 Purification
mAb PL-2 was purified from mouse ascites fluid with Protein A Plus
columns (Thermo Scientific). mAb PL-2 was eluted with IgG elution
buffer (pH 2.8; amine-based), and elution was neutralized with 1 M
Tris, pH 8. mAb PL-2 was dialyzed into phosphate-buffered saline,
pH 7.4 (PBS).
Fab PL-2 Production and Purification
mAb PL-2 Fab fragments (Fab PL-2) were generated by incubation of
purified mAb PL-2 with immobilized papain overnight at 37 °C.
Antibody Fc fragments were removed with Protein A Plus columns, and
the flow-through containing the Fab PL-2 fragments was collected.
Fab PL-2 was then dialyzed into 20 mM Tris, pH 8.5, and 25 mM NaCl
and further purified by anion exchange chromatography on a HiTrap
Q FF column (GE Healthcare) with a gradient elution with 20 mM Tris,
pH 8.5, and 1000 mM NaCl. Fab PL-2 was further purified by size exclusion
chromatography on a Superdex 200 column in PBS.
Fab PL-2 Structure
Determination
Purified Fab PL-2 was dialyzed into 10 mM Tris,
pH 8.0, and 150 mM NaCl and concentrated to 18.1 mg/mL. A crystal
grew by sitting drop vapor diffusion with a well solution of 25% PEG
3350 and 0.1 M citric acid, pH 4.5. This crystal was used for self-seeding
into a pre-equilibrated hanging drop with a well solution of 32% PEG
3350 and 0.1 M citric acid, pH 4.5. Needle-like crystals grown in
this condition were used for cross-seeding into a pre-equilibrated
hanging drop with a well solution of 15% PEG 3350 and 0.2 M ammonium
phosphate monobasic, pH 4.6. Crystals were transferred into a cryoprotectant
of 30.8% PEG 3350, 0.2 M magnesium acetate, and 30% ethylene glycol
and then flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Diffraction data were collected
at cryogenic temperature at the Advanced Light Source Beamline 5.0.1.
Diffraction data were processed with iMosflm[18] (Table ). The structure
was solved by molecular replacement using the Fab fragment from the
influenza virus N9 neuraminidase–NC41 Fab complex structure
(PDB ID 1NCA)[19] and the program PHASER.[20] The Fab PL-2 structure was refined and manually
rebuilt using PHENIX[21] and Coot,[22] respectively. The initial Fab PL-2 sequence
was determined by assessment of the electron density maps of each
amino acid side chain. Observations of hydrogen bond or van der Waals
interactions aided in distinguishing between amino acids with similar
electron density maps. If an amino acid could not be determined using
the electron density alone, the consensus amino acid from an alignment
of 29 different Fab–antigen complex crystal structures was
used to predict the initial Fab PL-2 sequence.[11] This preliminary Fab PL-2 sequence was used as a starting
point for sequence determination by mass spectrometry. The Fab PL-2
structure was corrected and finalized using the sequence determined
by mass spectrometry. The Fab PL-2 structural model and structure
factors have been deposited into the online Protein Data Bank (PDB; www.pdb.org) as PDB entry 5I30.
Sample Preparation for
Mass Spectrometry
Purified Fab PL-2 in PBS at 0.5 mg/mL in
a total of 0.5 mL was used for mass spectrometry. Ten micrograms were
buffer exchanged into 0.5% acetic acid for intact mass analysis using
7 kDa MWCO Zeba columns (Pierce). Four micrograms were reduced by
adding TCEP in 0.5% acetic acid to a final concentration of 20 mM.
The reaction was allowed to proceed at room temperature for 1 h, and
the sample was desalted using POROS R2 50 beads. For protease digests,
40 μg of Fab PL-2 were buffer exchanged into 100 mM ammonium
bicarbonate using 7 kDa MWCO Zeba columns. The sample was reduced
in DTT (10 mM final concentration) for 1 h at 57 °C followed
by alkylation with iodoacetamide (20 mM final concentration) for 45
min at room temperature in the dark. The sample was divided into four
aliquots of 10 μg and digested overnight at room temperature
with trypsin, with Glu-C and Lys-C (Promega) overnight, or with chymotrypsin
(Promega) for 4 h at room temperature. Samples were acidified with
0.2% TFA/5% formic acid and desalted using POROS R2 50 beads.
Mass Spectrometry
Intact
Fab
Fab PL-2 (0.1 μg) was loaded onto a ProSwift RP-4H
monolithic column (0.1 × 250 mm) mounted on an EASY nLC-1000
nanoUHPLC coupled to a Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer.
The Fab was eluted off the column using a gradient of 20–100%
B (90% acetonitrile, 0.5% acetic acid) over 50 min. MS1 data were
acquired by alternating between ion trap scans and Orbitrap scans,
with the HCD cell set to intact protein mode (0.003 bar); ion trap
scans were performed at m/z 1000–2200
using quadrupole isolation. Maximum injection time was set to 35 ms
with an AGC target of 3 × 105 summing 20 microscans.
The S-Lens RF was set to 100 with ISD set to 5 eV. Settings for the
Orbitrap scan were identical, except the resolution was set to 15 000
and the AGC target was set to 5 × 105.
Reduced Fab
Reduced Fab PL-2 (0.1 μg) was loaded onto a ProSwift RP-4H
monolithic column (0.1 × 250 mm), mounted on an EASY nLC-1000
nanoUHPLC coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer. The Fab
was eluted off the column using a gradient of 0–100% B (90%
acetonitrile, 0.5% acetic acid) over 50 min. Data were acquired at
full MS in the Orbitrap, with an HCD cell set to intact protein mode
(0.003 bar). Scans were acquired from m/z 600 to 1800 with 450 000 resolution using quadrupole isolation.
Maximum injection time was set to 35 ms with an AGC target of 5 ×
105 summing 10 microscans. The S-Lens RF was set to 80
with ISD set to 5 eV.
Digested Fab
Each digest (0.2 μg)
was loaded onto an EASY-Spray C18 Pepmap RSLC column (500 × 0.075
mm) mounted on an EASY nLC-1000 nanoUHPLC coupled to a Q-Exactive
mass spectrometer. The sample was eluted off the column using a gradient
of 0–30% B (90% acetonitrile, 0.5% acetic acid) over 90 min.
MS1 data were acquired from m/z 400
to 1500, 70 000 resolution, and one microscan. Data-dependent
MS2 scans were performed on the top 20 precursors with dynamic exclusion
activated for 30 s. Precursors were isolated using a m/z 2 window and HCD fragmented at 27% of normalized
collision energy (NCE). Underfill ratio was set to 5%, with a minimum
intensity of 2 × 104. Precursors with charges of 1
and 5–8 were excluded from fragmentation, as well as charge
unassigned precursors. First mass at MS2 was fixed at m/z 150.
Fab PL-2 Amino Acid Sequence
Determination
Unknown amino acids were determined by iteratively
searching the spectra against the current best protein sequence (FASTA
format) using Byonic v.2.6 (Protein Metrics Inc.). Byonic searches
used mass tolerances of 10 ppm for precursors and 20 ppm for fragments
and digestion specificities appropriate for the protease, for example,
semispecific cutting after Arg and Lys for the trypsin digest and
semispecific cutting after Trp, Tyr, Phe, Met, and Leu for chymotrypsin.
Initial searches allowed a wild card modification (any mass delta
from −130 to +130 Da on any one amino acid residue), along
with a few of the most common known modifications, namely, oxidized
methionine, deamidated asparagine, pyro-glu N-terminal Glu and Gln,
and overalkylated His, Lys, and N-terminus. Recognizable wild cards
were manually converted to known variants, usually single amino acid
substitutions, by editing the FASTA, and spectra were then searched
against the improved FASTA database. After about five iterations,
the complete Fab PL-2 light chain sequence was determined, as well
as the complete heavy chain sequence, except for a stretch of ∼10
residues between the heavy chain CDR2 and CDR3, around the N-linked
glycosylation site, as described above.
Production of Recombinant
scFv PL-2
The pMT-BiP-scFv-PL-2 expression plasmid was constructed
on the basis of previous studies.[13] Briefly,
a synthetic gene codon-optimized for Drosophila melanogaster (Integrated DNA Technologies) containing the Fab PL-2 heavy chain
residues Asp1– Ser117, a Kpnl restriction
site, a GGS(GGGGS)2GGG linker, a Nhel
restriction site, and the Fab PL-2 light chain residues Asp1–Arg108,
was cloned into a pMT-BiP vector between the BglII
and Sacll restriction sites in frame with an N-terminal
BiP signal sequence and a C-terminal thrombin protease cleavage site
followed by a Twin Strep-tag. The plasmid contains a metallothionein
promoter for induction of gene expression. The resulting pMT-BiP-scFv-PL-2
expression plasmid along with a hydrogmycin resistance plasmid (pCoHygro)
was used to obtain stably transfected D. melanogaster Schneider 2 (S2) cells. The S2 cells were grown in shaker flasks
to 4.2 × 106 cells/mL in Insect-XPRESS medium containing
1× Pen/Strep and 400 μg/mL hygromycin, and expression of
scFv PL-2 was induced with 500 μM cupric chloride. After 5 days,
cells were pelleted and media containing secreted scFv PL-2 was 0.22
μM filtered and 100-fold concentrated by tangential flow filtration.
The medium sample was supplemented with 80 mM Tris pH 8.0 and BioLock
(IBA) to mask biotin in the media and 0.22uM filtered again. scFv
PL-2 was affinity purified on a StrepTrap column followed by size
exclusion chromatography using a Superdex200 column in PBS. Final
yields of purified protein were ∼20 mg/L.
Production
of Recombinant HAstV-2 Capsid Protein
A synthetic gene codon-optimized
for Spodoptera frugiperda (Genewiz)
encoding the HAstV-2 capsid protein (UniProt accession no.Q82446) in-frame
with a C-terminal thrombin protease cleavage site and a 10× His-tag
was cloned into the pEU vector between the KpnI and Notl restriction sites. The resulting pEU-HAstV-2-capsid
expression plasmid was isolated following instructions from a DNA
purification kit (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.), yet excluding the
RNase from the resuspension buffer A1. To separate the DNA plasmid
from bacterial RNA contaminants, an RNA and DNA precipitation protocol
was adapted from an online protocol.[23] Briefly,
the sample was diluted with RNase-free water to 90 μLn and 30
μL of 8 M LiCl was added. Sample was incubated for 30 min at
−20 °C and spun at 4 °C at 15000g for 15 min. The supernatant was isolated, and 80 μL of isopropanol
was added. The sample was incubated for 30 min at −20 °C
and spun at 4 °C at 15000g for 15 min. The supernatant
was discarded, and the pellet was carefully washed with 100 μL
of 70% ethanol. The sample was spun at 4 °C at 15000g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was dried
at 50 °C for 15 min. DNA plasmid in the pellet was resuspended
with 8 μL of 5 mM Tris, pH 8.5. In vitro transcription and translation
of recombinant HAstV-2 capsid protein were performed with a wheat
germ cell-free protein synthesis system (WEPRO7240 Expression kit,
CellFree Sciences). Transcription was carried out at 37 °C for
6 h with a 20 μL reaction containing 2 μg of pEU-HAstV-2-capsid
expression plasmid, 1× transcription buffer, 25 mM NTP, 20 U
of RNase inhibitor, and 20 U of SP6 RNA polymerase. The translation
mixture containing 10 μL of transcribed mRNA, 0.8 μL of
creatine kinase at a concentration of 1 mg/mL, and 10 μL of
the WEPRO wheat germ extract was incubated under 206 μL of 1×
SUB_AMIX. Translation was allowed to proceed for 20 h at 15 °C.
Protein expression was evaluated by using RFP as a positive control.
The wheat germ extract reaction was mixed by pipetting and then spun
down at 14000g for 10 min. The insoluble (pellet)
and soluble (supernatant) fractions were analyzed by reducing SDS-PAGE
and Western blot with a HRP-conjugated anti-His-tag antibody.
HAstV-2
Capsid Immunoprecipitation Using scFv PL-2-Coated Beads
One
hundred microliters of Strep-Tactin Sepharose resin (IBA) was incubated
at 4 °C for 15 min with 0.6 mg of purified scFv PL-2 in PBS.
Beads were washed twice with 500 μL of buffer W (100 mM Tris,
150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH8). Beads were then incubated at 4 °C
for 15 min with 100 μL of soluble fraction of wheat germ extract
containing recombinant HAstV-2 capsid protein (+ Capsid) or 100 μL
wheat germ extract alone (− Capsid) containing all of the components
for translation but no transcribed mRNA. Beads were washed twice with
500 μL of buffer W, and bound protein was eluted with 40 μL
of buffer E (buffer W containing 2.5 mM d-desthibiotin).
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbant Assay (ELISA)
Fifty microliters
of soluble fraction of wheat germ extract containing recombinant HAstV-2
capsid protein (+ Capsid) or 50 μL of wheat germ extract alone
(− Capsid) was diluted with 100 μL of PBS and incubated
overnight at room temperature in a 96-well microtiter plate. The plate
was then washed four times with 1× PBS containing 0.05% Tween
20 (PBST). Wells were blocked by adding 150 μL of 5% BSA in
PBS and incubated for 1 h, followed by four PBST washes. Wells were
then incubated with 150 μL of primary antibody at room temperature
for 1 h. Full-length antibodies mAb PL-2 and the negative control
IgG1 mAb (mAb NegC) that recognizes the V1 V2 domain in the HIV envelope
glycoprotein were incubated at 5 μg/mL in 1% BSA in PBS (blocking
buffer). The scFv PL-2 was incubated at 20 μg/mL in blocking
buffer. Plates were washed four times with PBST and then incubated
for 1 h at room temperature with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG
secondary antibody (for full-length mAbs) or HRP-conjugated Strep-Tactin
(for scFv), each diluted 1:5000 in blocking buffer. Plates were washed
four times with PBST and then developed by adding peroxidase substrate o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (OPD) in phosphate–citrate
buffer and 1.5% hydrogen peroxide for 5 min at room temperature. The
reactions were stopped with 2 N sulfuric acid, and the absorbance
was measured at 490 nm.
Authors: T Geoff G Battye; Luke Kontogiannis; Owen Johnson; Harold R Powell; Andrew G W Leslie Journal: Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr Date: 2011-03-18
Authors: Galina Obmolova; Thomas J Malia; Alexey Teplyakov; Raymond W Sweet; Gary L Gilliland Journal: Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 1.056
Authors: Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read Journal: J Appl Crystallogr Date: 2007-07-13 Impact factor: 3.304
Authors: Walter A Bogdanoff; Jocelyn Campos; Edmundo I Perez; Lu Yin; David L Alexander; Rebecca M DuBois Journal: J Virol Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 5.103