| Literature DB >> 27213005 |
Tanja Wirth1, Agnessa Kozak2, Grita Schedlbauer1, Albert Nienhaus3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Apprentices in human service professions are exposed to emotional and physical stresses in their workplaces. Moreover, they are in the vulnerable phase of becoming an adult. Their lifestyle and health therefore seem to be particularly unstable. This study aims to evaluate and compare the health behaviour, health status and occupational prospects of apprentices in nursing and early childhood education and to identify factors associated with their physical and mental health.Entities:
Keywords: Health behaviour; Health status; Job satisfaction; Mental disorder; Musculoskeletal disorders; Observational study; Student nurses
Year: 2016 PMID: 27213005 PMCID: PMC4875701 DOI: 10.1186/s12995-016-0116-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol ISSN: 1745-6673 Impact factor: 2.646
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the recruitment process
Variables of the study instrument used in the analyses
| Variables | Name and source of the original scales and items | α | Items (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Socio-demographic factorsa | 18 | ||
| Health behaviour | |||
| Physical activity | Health Questionnaire age 18–64 years [ | – | 1 |
| Dietary habits | Food Frequency Questionnaire [ | – | 15 |
| Smoking | Health Questionnaire age 18–64 years [ | – | 2 |
| Alcohol consumption | AUDIT-C [ | – | 3 |
| Health status | |||
| General health status | Survey in vocational schools in Bielefeld [ | – | 1 |
| Diseases and complaints | Work Ability Index – Questionnaire [ | – | 6 |
| Self-efficacy | Self-efficacy scale [ | 0.85 | 10 |
| Irritation | Irritation scale [ | 0.88 | 8 |
| Occupational situation and prospects | |||
| Job satisfaction | COPSOQ: German standard version [ | 0.81 | 7 |
| Job strain and prospects | Additional questions (e.g., taking into account the current work situation, do you want to stay in this profession for the next five years?) | – | 3 |
aIncluded age, sex, height, weight, migration background, socioeconomic status and year of education
α = Cronbach’s alpha, AUDIT-C Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, COPSOQ Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire
Characteristics of the study population
| Geriatric nursing ( | General healthcare and nursing ( | Early childhood education ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) |
|
| Age groups (years) | <0.001 | |||
| 16–19 | 20 (15.4) | 24 (16.9) | 24 (29.3) | |
| 20–22 | 38 (29.2) | 62 (43.7) | 29 (35.4) | |
| 23–26 | 46 (35.4) | 49 (34.5) | 20 (24.4) | |
| 27–30 | 26 (20.0) | 7 (4.9) | 9 (11.0) | |
| Sex | 0.07 | |||
| Female | 98 (75.4) | 122 (85.9) | 63 (76.8) | |
| Male | 32 (24.6) | 20 (14.1) | 19 (23.2) | |
| Body mass index | 0.15 | |||
| < 18.5 | 4 (3.1) | 9 (6.3) | 7 (8.5) | |
| 18.5–24.9 | 78 (60.0) | 95 (66.9) | 45 (54.9) | |
| 25–30 | 26 (20.0) | 26 (18.3) | 18 (22.0) | |
| ≥ 30 | 14 (10.8) | 5 (3.5) | 6 (7.3) | |
| Migration background | 0.13 | |||
| No | 90 (69.2) | 110 (77.5) | 57 (69.5) | |
| Yes | 38 (29.2) | 28 (19.7) | 25 (30.5) | |
| Socioeconomic statusa | <0.001 | |||
| Low | 64 (49.2) | 25 (17.6) | 37 (45.1) | |
| Middle | 52 (40.0) | 79 (55.6) | 36 (43.9) | |
| High | 4 (3.1) | 30 (21.1) | 3 (3.7) | |
| Year of education | <0.001 | |||
| 1st | 32 (24.6) | 59 (41.5) | 29 (35.4) | |
| 2nd | 66 (50.8) | 35 (24.6) | 53 (64.6) | |
| 3rd | 32 (24.6) | 48 (33.8) | / |
aDerived from educational level of apprentices and parental occupation
Missing values: Body mass index n = 21 (5.9 %); Migration background n = 6 (1.7 %); Socioeconomic status n = 24 (6.8 %)
Group comparisons of health behaviour, health status and occupational prospects
| Geriatric nursing ( | General healthcare and nursing ( | Early childhood education ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | Chi2 (df) |
|
| Health behaviour | |||||
| Physical activity | 6.5 (4) | 0.16 | |||
| No physical activity | 33 (25.4) | 22 (15.5) | 18 (22.0) | ||
| < 2 h/week | 62 (47.7) | 66 (46.5) | 39 (47.6) | ||
| ≥ 2 h/week | 32 (24.6) | 52 (36.6) | 25 (30.5) | ||
| Dietary patterns | 9.9 (4) | <0.05 | |||
| Unfavourable | 53 (40.8) | 39 (27.5) | 38 (46.3) | ||
| Normal | 36 (27.7) | 49 (34.5) | 22 (26.8) | ||
| Favourable | 26 (20.0) | 42 (29.6) | 18 (22.0) | ||
| Smoking habits | 17.6 (6) | <0.01 | |||
| Daily | 58 (44.6) | 43 (30.3) | 29 (35.4) | ||
| Occasionally | 14 (10.8) | 7 (4.9) | 7 (8.5) | ||
| Former | 17 (13.1) | 15 (10.6) | 5 (6.1) | ||
| Never | 41 (31.5) | 77 (54.2) | 41 (50.0) | ||
| Hazardous alcohol consumption | 0.7 (2) | 0.69 | |||
| Yes | 53 (40.8) | 60 (42.3) | 38 (46.3) | ||
| No | 72 (55.4) | 80 (56.3) | 41 (50.0) | ||
| Health status | |||||
| Self-rated health status | 9.2 (4) | 0.06 | |||
| Excellent/very good | 52 (40.0) | 55 (38.7) | 25 (30.5) | ||
| Good | 65 (50.0) | 74 (52.1) | 40 (48.8) | ||
| Not so good/poor | 11 (8.5) | 13 (9.2) | 17 (20.7) | ||
| Diseases and complaints | |||||
| Mental disorder | 50 (38.5) | 44 (31.0) | 40 (48.8) | 7.9 (2) | <0.05 |
| MSD | 45 (34.6) | 52 (36.6) | 26 (31.7) | 0.5 (2) | 0.79 |
| Neurological or sensory disease | 47 (36.2) | 39 (27.5) | 25 (30.5) | 2.3 (2) | 0.32 |
| Respiratory disease | 34 (26.2) | 48 (33.8) | 23 (28.0) | 1.9 (2) | 0.38 |
| Skin disease | 33 (25.4) | 47 (33.1) | 23 (28.0) | 2.0 (2) | 0.37 |
| Injury due to an accident | 37 (28.5) | 28 (19.7) | 25 (30.5) | 4.0 (2) | 0.13 |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | F (df1/df2) |
| |
| Self-efficacy (10–40) | 29.3 (4.5) | 29.2 (4.2) | 28.1 (4.9) | 1.9 (2/338) | 0.15 |
| Irritation (8–56) | 23.4 (11.1) | 21.9 (9.9) | 24.7 (10.2) | 1.8 (2/343) | 0.17 |
| Occupational prospects | |||||
| Job satisfaction (0–100) | 62.1 (15.9) | 57.4 (15.2) | 68.2 (16.7) | 12.3 (2/350) | <0.001 |
Missing values: Physical activity n = 5 (1.4 %); Dietary patterns = 31 (8.8 %); Hazardous alcohol consumption n = 10 (2.8 %); Self-rated health status n = 2 (0.6 %)
SD standard deviation, df degrees of freedom, MSD musculoskeletal disorders
Variables associated with musculoskeletal and mental disorders
| Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) | |||
| Independent variables | MSD n (%) | Crude OR (95 % CI) | Adjusted ORa (95 % CI) |
| Age (years) | |||
| 16–19 | 17 (25.0) | 1 | 1 |
| 20–22 | 38 (29.7) | 1.3 (0.7–2.5) | 1.2 (0.6–2.7) |
| 23–26 | 58 (50.4) | 3.1 (1.6–5.9)** | 3.1 (1.4–6.7)** |
| 27–30 | 10 (23.8) | 0.9 (0.4–2.3) | 1.0 (0.4–2.8) |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| High | 16 (43.2) | 1 | 1 |
| Middle | 67 (40.1) | 0.9 (0.4–1.8) | 1.0 (0.5–2.2) |
| Low | 31 (24.8) | 0.4 (0.2–0.9)* | 0.5 (0.2–1.2) |
| Mental disorder | |||
| No | 60 (27.6) | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 62 (46.3) | 2.3 (1.4–3.5)*** | 1.8 (1.1–3.1)* |
| Irritation (8–56) | / | 1.04 (1.02–1.06)** | 1.02 (1.00–1.05) |
| Job satisfaction (0–100) | / | 0.98 (0.97–0.99)** | 0.99 (0.97–1.01) |
| Mental disorder | |||
| Independent variables | Mental disorder n (%) | Crude OR (95 % CI) | Adjusted ORa (95 % CI) |
| Apprenticeship trade | |||
| General healthcare and nursing | 44 (31.0) | 1 | 1 |
| Geriatric nursing | 50 (38.5) | 1.4 (0.8–2.3) | 1.4 (0.8–2.7) |
| Early childhood education | 40 (50.0) | 2.2 (1.3–3.9)** | 2.9 (1.4–6.0)** |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| High | 9 (24.3) | 1 | 1 |
| Middle | 73 (43.7) | 2.4 (1.1–5.4)* | 2.2 (0.9–5.4) |
| Low | 43 (34.7) | 1.7 (0.7–3.8) | 1.5 (0.6–4.1) |
| MSD | |||
| No | 72 (31.4) | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 62 (50.8) | 2.3 (1.4–3.5)*** | 2.1 (1.2–3.7)** |
| Self-efficacy (10–40) | / | 0.89 (0.85–0.94)*** | 0.93 (0.87–0.99)* |
| Irritation (8–56) | / | 1.07 (1.05–1.10)*** | 1.05 (1.02–1.08)** |
| Job satisfaction (0–100) | / | 0.98 (0.97–0.99)** | 0.98 (0.97–1.00) |
Multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine variables associated with MSD was performed with n = 318 participants (Nagelkerke’s Pseudo R2 = 0.18). Multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine variables associated with mental disorder was performed with n = 310 participants (Nagelkerke’s Pseudo R2 = 0.25)
aAdjusted for the other variables in the model
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval; *p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001