| Literature DB >> 27212787 |
Y P Singh1, V K Mishra1, Sudhanshu Singh2, D K Sharma3, D Singh1, U S Singh2, R K Singh4, S M Haefele5, A M Ismail4.
Abstract
Regaining the agricultural potential of sodic soils in the Indo-Gangetic plains necessitates the development of suitable salt tolerant rice varieties to provide an entry for other affordable agronomic and soil manipulation measures. Thus selection of high yielding rice varieties across a range of sodic soils is central. Evaluation of breeding lines through on-station and on-farm farmers' participatory varietal selection (FPVS) resulted in the identification of a short duration (110-115 days), high yielding and disease resistant salt-tolerant rice genotype 'CSR-89IR-8', which was later released as 'CSR43' in 2011. Several agronomic traits coupled with good grain quality and market value contributed to commercialization and quick adoption of this variety in the sodic areas of the Indo-Gangetic plains of eastern India. Management practices required for rice production in salt affected soils are evidently different from those in normal soils and practices for a short duration salt tolerant variety differ from those for medium to long duration varieties. Experiments were conducted at the Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute (ICAR-CSSRI), Regional Research Station, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India during 2011 and 2013 wet seasons, to test the hypothesis that combining matching management practices (Mmp) with an improved genotype would enhance productivity and profitability of rice in sodic soils. Mmp were developed on-station by optimizing existing best management practices (Bmp) recommended for the region to match the requirements of CSR43. The results revealed that transplanting 4 seedlings hill-1 at a spacing of 15 × 20 cm produced significantly higher yield over other treatments. The highest additional net gain was US$ 3.3 at 90 kg ha-1 N, and the lowest was US$ 0.4 at 150 kg ha-1 N. Above 150 kg ha-1, the additional net gain became negative, indicating decreasing returns from additional N. Hence, 150 kg N ha-1 was considered the economic optimum N application rate for CSR43 in these sodic soils. Using 150-60-40-25 kg N-P2O5-K2O-ZnSO4·7H2O ha-1 in farmers' fields grown to CSR43 produced an average of 5.5 t ha-1 grain. The results of on-farm evaluation trials of CSR43 showed that matching management practices (Mmp) increased yield by 8% over existing best management practices (Bmp) recommended by ICAR-CSSRI for sodic soils and by 16% over framers' management practices; however, combining Mmp with CSR43 resulted in 35% higher yields over farmers' current varieties and management. This approach of combining cost effective crop and nutrient management options and a salt-tolerant variety can maximize the productivity and profitability of sodic soils in the alluvial Indo-Gangetic plains and in neighboring salt-affected areas of the Ganges mega delta in South Asia.Entities:
Keywords: Cost effective options; Crop management; Nutrient management; Salt affected soils; Salt tolerant rice
Year: 2016 PMID: 27212787 PMCID: PMC4862441 DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Field Crops Res ISSN: 0378-4290 Impact factor: 5.224
Processes followed in the selection of CSR43 through farmers’ participatory varietal selection.
| Year | Process | Number of genotypes planted in sodic soil | Number of genotypes selected | Number of trial sites in sodic soils per year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Screening of genotypes (by breeders) | 126 | 18 | 2 |
| 2002 | FPVS | 18 | 12 | 5 |
| 2003 | FPVS | 12 | 9 | 6 |
| 2004 | FPVS | 9 | 6 | 6 |
| 2005 | Final selection through FPVS | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 2006–2008 | Evaluation through farmers managed trials | 2 new + 1 farmers variety | 1 selected; released as “CSR43” in 2011 | 32 |
Details of field experiments conducted at ICAR-CSSRI, RRS, Lucknow (on-station) to develop management practices for CSR43 during the wet seasons of 2011 and 2013 and validation in farmers’ fields (on-farm) during 2014 wet season.
| Experiment and design | Treatments | Treatment details |
|---|---|---|
| On-station trials (wet seasons 2011–2013) | ||
| Experiment I | ||
| Optimizing number of seedlings hill−1 and spacing | Main plot: seedlings hill-1 (T) | T1: 2, T2: 4 |
| (Split-plot) | Sub-plot: spacing (S) | S1: 15 × 15 cm, S2: 15 × 20 cm, S3: 20 × 20 cm |
| Experiment II | ||
| Nutrient management (RBD) | Nitrogen level (N) | N1: 0, N2: 100, N3: 125, N4: 150, N5: 175, N6: 200 kg ha−1; 60–40–25 kg P2O5–K2O–ZnSO4.7H2O ha−1 applied to all plots |
| On-farm experiments (wet season, 2014) | ||
| Validation of management practices for CSR43 (RBD) | FvFm | 1–2 seedlings hill−1, random planting, and 100–0–0 kg N–P2O5–K2O ha−1; varieties: Ganga Kaveri, Moti and Narendra359 |
| IvFm | Management practices same as above except using variety CSR43 | |
| IvBmp | 3 seedlings hill−1 at 15 × 15 cm, and recommended fertilizer application of 120–60–40–25 kg N–P2O5–K2O–ZnSO4·7H2O ha−1 in main field; variety: CSR43 | |
| IvMmp | 4 seedlings hill−1 at 15 × 20 cm, with fertilizer application of 150–60–40–25 N–P2O5–K2O–ZnSO4·7H2O ha−1 in main field; variety: CSR43 | |
FvFm: farmers’ variety and farmer management; IvFm: improved variety and farmers’ management; IvBmp: improved variety and existing (best) management practices; IvMmp: improved variety and improved (matching) management practices established in on-station experiments.
Preference scoresa (mean ± SE) of desirable traits and on-station and on-farm grain yield of 6 rice genotypes evaluated during the 2005 wet season at Lucknow, UP, India.
| Traits | CSR-2K-239 | NDR359 | CSR13 | CSR-89IR-8 | CSR36 | CSR-2K-262 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| Plant height | 6.0 ± 0.5 | 6.0 ± 0.4 | 6.0 ± 0.4 | 8.0 ± 0.5 | 6.0 ± 0.5 | 7.0 ± 0.4 |
| Productive tillers hill−1 | 6.0 ± 0.5 | 7.0 ± 0.4 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 8.0 ± 0.5 | 8.0 ± 0.8 | 7.0 ± 0.8 |
| Days to maturity | 6.0 ± 0.4 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 7.0 ± 0.5 | 9.0 ± 0.4 | 7.0 ± 0.6 | 7.0 ± 0.7 |
| Lodging tolerance | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 6.0 ± 0.5 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 8.0 ± 0.6 | 7.0 ± 0.7 | 7.0 ± 0.5 |
| Sodicity tolerance | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 7.0 ± 0.8 | 7.0 ± 0.7 | 8.0 ± 0.5 | 8.0 ± 0.6 | 8.0 ±n0.7 |
| Grain quality | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 7.0 ± 0.7 | 7.0 ± 0.7 | 8.0 ± 0.7 | 7.0 ± 0.7 | 8.0 ± 0.8 |
| Cooking quality | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 6.0 ± 0.8 | 7.0 ± 0.8 | 7.0 ± 0.8 | 7.0 ± 0.8 |
| Grain yield (t ha−1) | ||||||
| On-station | 4.9 ± 0.2 | 5.0 ± 0.4 | 5.0 ± 3.0 | 5.2 ± .04 | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 0.3 |
| On-farm | 4.8 ± 0.3 | 4.9 ± 0.2 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 0.3 | 5.0 ± 0.3 |
| Preference score | −0.05 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.04 |
Preference scoring scale (1–10), 1 = least preferred; 10 = most preferred.
Effect of number of seedlings hill−1 and spacing on growth of transplanted CSR43 in an on-station field trial in 2011 wet season at ICAR-CSSRI research farm, Lucknow, UP, India.
| Treatments | Plant height (cm) | Productive tillers hill−1 | Dry matter (g hill−1) | No. of spikelets panicle−1 | Fertility (%) | 1000-grain weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of seedlings hill−1 | ||||||
| 2 | 98.3 | 9.4 | 52.0 | 125 | 85.7 | 25.9 |
| 4 | 96.7 | 10.9 | 63.7 | 143 | 84.2 | 25.0 |
| LSD0.05 | ns | 1.2 | 2.6 | 7 | ns | ns |
| Spacing (cm) | ||||||
| 15 × 15 | 97.8 | 9.3 | 56.8 | 129 | 84.9 | 24.8 |
| 15 × 20 | 98.9 | 11.1 | 58.6 | 138 | 87.8 | 25.3 |
| 20 × 20 | 95.7 | 10.1 | 58.2 | 133 | 82.3 | 26.3 |
| LSD0.05 | 1.9 | ns | ns | ns | 3.36 | ns |
ns, not significant.
Fig. 1Grain (a) and straw (b) yields as influenced by number of seedlings hill−1 and spacing of transplanted CSR43 in on-station field trial conducted during 2011 wet season at ICAR-CSSRI research farm, Lucknow, India.
Economic indicators of different crop establishment options in on-station field trial conducted during 2011 wet season at ICAR-CSSRI research farm, Lucknow, UP, India.
| Treatments | Variable cost(US$ ha−1) | Production cost (fixed | Gross return (US$ ha−1) | Net return (US$ ha−1) | BCR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uprooting | Transplanting | |||||
| Number of seedlings hill−1 | ||||||
| 2 | 12.3 | 24.9 | 367 | 745 | 378 | 2.03 |
| 4 | 16.7 | 33.7 | 380 | 919 | 539 | 2.41 |
| LSD0.05 | – | – | – | 47 | 47 | 0.12 |
| Spacing (cm) | ||||||
| 15 x 15 | 16.7 | 33.7 | 380 | 853 | 473 | 2.24 |
| 15 x 20 | 14.5 | 29.3 | 373 | 867 | 494 | 2.32 |
| 20 x 20 | 12.3 | 24.8 | 367 | 776 | 409 | 2.11 |
| LSD0.05 | – | – | – | 58 | 58 | 0.15 |
Fixed cost (329.5 US$ ha−1).
BCR, benefit/cost ratio.
Effect of N treatments on growth and yield attributes of CSR43 in an on-station field trial conducted during 2013 wet season at ICAR-CSSRI research farm, Lucknow, UP, India.
| N level (kg ha−1) | Plant height (cm) | Productive tiller hill−1 | LAI | Days to maturity (d) | Number of spikelets panicle−1 | Fertility (%) | 1000-grain weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 96 | 8.6 | 4.6 | 105 | 83 | 89.6 | 24.6 |
| 100 | 100 | 9.1 | 5.2 | 108 | 111 | 85.3 | 27.6 |
| 125 | 103 | 12.1 | 5.4 | 110 | 121 | 88.6 | 26.7 |
| 150 | 106 | 13.4 | 5.6 | 112 | 134 | 92.0 | 28.1 |
| 175 | 106 | 14.2 | 6.0 | 115 | 142 | 90.0 | 28.1 |
| 200 | 108 | 14.7 | 6.1 | 120 | 145 | 91.0 | 28.4 |
| LSD0.05 | ns | 1.2 | 0.1 | 3.2 | 8.7 | ns | 1.05 |
ns, not significant.
Fig. 2Grain (a) and straw (b) yields of CSR43 as influenced by N treatments in an on-station trial conducted during 2013 wet season at ICAR-CSSRI research farm, Lucknow, UP, India.
Fig. 3Trend analysis of grain yield of the rice variety CSR43 as affected by different N treatments in an on-station field trial conducted during the 2013 wet season at ICAR-CSSRI research farm, Lucknow, UP, India.
Economic indicators of different N treatments in an on-station field trial conducted during the wet season of 2013 at ICAR-CSSRI research farm, Lucknow, UP, India.
| N levels (kg ha−1) | Production cost (US$ ha−1) | Gross return (US$ ha−1) | Net return (US$ ha−1) | BCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 313 | 600 | 289 | 1.93 |
| 100 | 359 | 1101 | 742 | 3.07 |
| 125 | 371 | 1221 | 850 | 3.29 |
| 150 | 383 | 1318 | 935 | 3.44 |
| 175 | 395 | 1339 | 944 | 3.39 |
| 200 | 408 | 1211 | 803 | 2.97 |
| LSD0.05 | – | 115 | 115 | 0.16 |
BCR benefit/cost ratio; selling price of grain was 218 US$/t, and straw was 16.7 US$/t.
Fig. 4Analyses of the economic optimum amount of N for rice variety CSR43 under sodic field conditions.
Fig. 5Grain yield as influenced by varieties and management practices in on-farm trials in Eastern Uttar Pradesh during 2014 wet season. FvFm, Farmer’s variety with farmer’s management; IvFm, improved variety with farmer’s management; IvBmp, improved variety with best management practices (existing); IvMmp, improved variety with matching management practices developed in this study for CSR43. Farmers’ varieties were Ganga Kaveri, Moti and Narendra359.