Literature DB >> 27212710

Comparison of SemiQuantitative Cotinine Values Obtained by the DRI Immunoassay and Values Obtained by a Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Method: The DRI Immunoassay is Suitable for Screening Purposes Only Because Semiquantitative Values May Be Unreliable.

R Brent Dixon1, Amitava Dasgupta2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: DRI cotinine assay is suitable only for screening for cotinine in urine specimens. We studied the reliability of DRI cotinine semiquantitative values by comparing them with the cotinine concentration obtained with a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method.
METHODS: Semiquantitative cotinine concentrations in 39 urine specimens obtained by the DRI immunoassay were compared with cotinine concentrations obtained by LC-MS/MS.
RESULTS: The DRI cotinine assay consistently overestimated cotinine values obtained by the LC/MS/MS method (y = 1.1529 x + 252.24, n = 39, R2 = 0.8899) indicating that semiquantitative values obtained using the DRI assay may be unreliable. However, no false-negative results were observed using the DRI assay.
CONCLUSION: DRI cotinine assay is suitable only for screening cotinine in urine specimens.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DRI Assay; LC/MS/MS; cotinine; positive Bias

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27212710      PMCID: PMC6807043          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.21988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  11 in total

1.  A rapid LC-MS-MS method for the determination of nicotine and cotinine in serum and saliva samples from smokers: validation and comparison with a radioimmunoassay method.

Authors:  G D Byrd; R A Davis; M W Ogden
Journal:  J Chromatogr Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.618

2.  Urinary cotinine fluoroimmunoassay for smoking status screening adapted to an automated analyser.

Authors:  S A Eremin; R E Coxon; D L Colbert; J Landon; D S Smith
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.616

3.  Specific detection of anabasine, nicotine, and nicotine metabolites in urine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Andrew N Hoofnagle; Thomas J Laha; Petrie M Rainey; Sayed M H Sadrzadeh
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  A simple, fast, and sensitive method for the measurement of serum nicotine, cotinine, and nornicotine by LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Chao Yuan; Justin Kosewick; Sihe Wang
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.645

5.  Correlation between urinary nicotine, cotinine and self-reported smoking status among educated young adults.

Authors:  Che Nin Man; Ahmed Ibrahim Fathelrahman; Gam Lay Harn; Razak Lajis; Ahmad Shalihin Mohd Samin; Maizurah Omar; Rahmat Awang; Nurulain Abdullah Bayanuddin
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.860

6.  Dose-related effect of urinary cotinine levels on pulmonary function among Korean women.

Authors:  K Y Kim; J-P Myong; H-R Kim; H E Lee; T-W Jang; J-W Koo; C Y Park
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Zinc Sulfate, a Recently Introduced Urinary Adulterant Can Invalidate Urine Cotinine Test Using Immunoassay but Has Less Effect on Liquid Chromatography Combined With Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Test.

Authors:  R Brent Dixon; Amitava Dasgupta
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.681

8.  Estimation of urinary cotinine cut-off points distinguishing non-smokers, passive and active smokers.

Authors:  Wioleta Zielińska-Danch; Władysław Wardas; Andrzej Sobczak; Izabela Szołtysek-Bołdys
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  The accuracy of urinary cotinine immunoassay test strip as an add-on test to self-reported smoking before major elective surgery.

Authors:  Anna Lee; Tony Gin; Po Tong Chui; Perpetua E Tan; Chun Hung Chiu; Tsui Ping Tam; Winnie Samy
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Determinants of self-reported smoking and misclassification during pregnancy, and analysis of optimal cut-off points for urinary cotinine: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Juan J Aurrekoetxea; Mario Murcia; Marisa Rebagliato; María José López; Ane Miren Castilla; Loreto Santa-Marina; Mónica Guxens; Ana Fernández-Somoano; Mercedes Espada; Aitana Lertxundi; Adonina Tardón; Ferran Ballester
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.