Literature DB >> 27212052

Molecular and physiological responses to titanium dioxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles in Arabidopsis.

Laxminath Tumburu1, Christian P Andersen2, Paul T Rygiewicz2, Jay R Reichman2.   

Abstract

Changes in tissue transcriptomes and productivity of Arabidopsis thaliana were investigated during exposure of plants to 2 widely used engineered metal oxide nanoparticles, titanium dioxide (nano-titania) and cerium dioxide (nano-ceria). Microarray analyses confirmed that exposure to either nanoparticle altered the transcriptomes of rosette leaves and roots, with comparatively larger numbers of differentially expressed genes found under nano-titania exposure. Nano-titania induced more differentially expressed genes in rosette leaves, whereas roots had more differentially expressed genes under nano-ceria exposure. MapMan analyses indicated that although nano-titania up-regulated overall metabolism in both tissues, metabolic processes under nano-ceria remained mostly unchanged. Gene enrichment analysis indicated that both nanoparticles mainly enriched ontology groups such as responses to stress (abiotic and biotic), and defense responses (pathogens), and responses to endogenous stimuli (hormones). Nano-titania specifically induced genes associated with photosynthesis, whereas nano-ceria induced expression of genes related to activating transcription factors, most notably those belonging to the ethylene responsive element binding protein family. Interestingly, there were also increased numbers of rosette leaves and plant biomass under nano-ceria exposure, but not under nano-titania. Other transcriptomic responses did not clearly relate to responses observed at the organism level, possibly because of functional and genomic redundancy in Arabidopsis, which may mask expression of morphological changes, despite discernable responses at the transcriptome level. In addition, transcriptomic changes often relate to transgenerational phenotypic development, and hence it may be productive to direct further experimental work to integrate high-throughput genomic results with longer term changes in subsequent generations. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:71-82. Published 2016 Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of SETAC. This article is a US government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America. Published 2016 Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of SETAC. This article is a US government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabidopsis thaliana; Engineered nanoparticles; Growth; Nano-ceria; Nano-titania; Transcriptome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27212052      PMCID: PMC6135101          DOI: 10.1002/etc.3500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  63 in total

Review 1.  Arabidopsis gene knockout: phenotypes wanted.

Authors:  N Bouché; D Bouchez
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.834

2.  Simpleaffy: a BioConductor package for Affymetrix Quality Control and data analysis.

Authors:  Claire L Wilson; Crispin J Miller
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Dude, where's my phenotype? Dealing with redundancy in signaling networks.

Authors:  Sean Cutler; Peter McCourt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Tissue-specific profiling reveals transcriptome alterations in Arabidopsis mutants lacking morphological phenotypes.

Authors:  Marissa Simon; Angela Bruex; Raghunandan M Kainkaryam; Xiaohua Zheng; Ling Huang; Peter J Woolf; John Schiefelbein
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  An abscisic acid-sensitive checkpoint in lateral root development of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Ive De Smet; Laurent Signora; Tom Beeckman; Dirk Inzé; Christine H Foyer; Hanma Zhang
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.417

6.  Trans-generational impact of cerium oxide nanoparticles on tomato plants.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Stephen D Ebbs; Yongsheng Chen; Xingmao Ma
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.526

7.  Germination and early plant development of ten plant species exposed to titanium dioxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Christian P Andersen; George King; Milt Plocher; Marjorie Storm; Lok R Pokhrel; Mark G Johnson; Paul T Rygiewicz
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Toxicity study of cerium oxide nanoparticles in human neuroblastoma cells.

Authors:  Monika Kumari; Shailendra Pratap Singh; Srinivas Chinde; Mohammed Fazlur Rahman; Mohammed Mahboob; Paramjit Grover
Journal:  Int J Toxicol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.032

9.  Origin of the different phytotoxicity and biotransformation of cerium and lanthanum oxide nanoparticles in cucumber.

Authors:  Yuhui Ma; Peng Zhang; Zhiyong Zhang; Xiao He; Yuanyuan Li; Jing Zhang; Lirong Zheng; Shengqi Chu; Ke Yang; Yuliang Zhao; Zhifang Chai
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 5.913

10.  Phenotypic and genomic responses to titanium dioxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles in Arabidopsis germinants.

Authors:  Laxminath Tumburu; Christian P Andersen; Paul T Rygiewicz; Jay R Reichman
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.742

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in Metal-Based Nanoparticle-Mediated Biological Effects in Arabidopsis thaliana: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Min Geng; Linlin Li; Mingjun Ai; Jun Jin; Die Hu; Kai Song
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Douglas-Fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) Transcriptome Profile Changes Induced by Diesel Emissions Generated with CeO2 Nanoparticle Fuel Borne Catalyst.

Authors:  Jay R Reichman; Paul T Rygiewicz; Mark G Johnson; Michael A Bollman; Bonnie M Smith; Q Todd Krantz; Charly J King; Kasey D Kovalcik; Christian P Andersen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  Nanoimpact in Plants: Lessons from the Transcriptome.

Authors:  Susana García-Sánchez; Michal Gala; Gabriel Žoldák
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-12

Review 4.  Engineered Nanomaterials in Soil: Their Impact on Soil Microbiome and Plant Health.

Authors:  Shams Tabrez Khan; Syed Farooq Adil; Mohammed Rafi Shaik; Hamad Z Alkhathlan; Merajuddin Khan; Mujeeb Khan
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-30

5.  Metabolomic analyses of the bio-corona formed on TiO2 nanoparticles incubated with plant leaf tissues.

Authors:  Jasmina Kurepa; Timothy E Shull; Jan A Smalle
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 10.435

6.  Common Gene Expression Patterns in Environmental Model Organisms Exposed to Engineered Nanomaterials: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michael Burkard; Alexander Betz; Kristin Schirmer; Anze Zupanic
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Comparative Analysis of Proteins Regulated during Cadmium Sulfide Quantum Dots Response in Arabidopsis thaliana Wild Type and Tolerant Mutants.

Authors:  Valentina Gallo; Andrea Zappettini; Marco Villani; Nelson Marmiroli; Marta Marmiroli
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 5.076

8.  Growth-Promoting Gold Nanoparticles Decrease Stress Responses in Arabidopsis Seedlings.

Authors:  Eleonora Ferrari; Francesco Barbero; Marti Busquets-Fité; Mirita Franz-Wachtel; Heinz-R Köhler; Victor Puntes; Birgit Kemmerling
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 5.076

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.