Literature DB >> 27212003

A review of instruments to measure interprofessional team-based primary care.

Sarah J Shoemaker1, Michael L Parchman2, Kathleen Kerwin Fuda3, Judith Schaefer2, Jessica Levin4, Meaghan Hunt1, Richard Ricciardi5.   

Abstract

Interprofessional team-based care is increasingly regarded as an important feature of delivery systems redesigned to provide more efficient and higher quality care, including primary care. Measurement of the functioning of such teams might enable improvement of team effectiveness and could facilitate research on team-based primary care. Our aims were to develop a conceptual framework of high-functioning primary care teams to identify and review instruments that measure the constructs identified in the framework, and to create a searchable, web-based atlas of such instruments (available at: http://primarycaremeasures.ahrq.gov/team-based-care/ ). Our conceptual framework was developed from existing frameworks, the teamwork literature, and expert input. The framework is based on an Input-Mediator-Output model and includes 12 constructs to which we mapped both instruments as a whole, and individual instrument items. Instruments were also reviewed for relevance to measuring team-based care, and characterized. Instruments were identified from peer-reviewed and grey literature, measure databases, and expert input. From nearly 200 instruments initially identified, we found 48 to be relevant to measuring team-based primary care. The majority of instruments were surveys (n = 44), and the remainder (n = 4) were observational checklists. Most instruments had been developed/tested in healthcare settings (n = 30) and addressed multiple constructs, most commonly communication (n = 42), heedful interrelating (n = 42), respectful interactions (n = 40), and shared explicit goals (n = 37). The majority of instruments had some reliability testing (n = 39) and over half included validity testing (n = 29). Currently available instruments offer promise to researchers and practitioners to assess teams' performance, but additional work is needed to adapt these instruments for primary care settings.

Keywords:  Instruments; interprofessional practice; primary care; surveys; team-based care; teamwork

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27212003     DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1154023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  11 in total

1.  Attitudes of medical doctors and nurses towards the role of the nurses in the primary care unit in Italy.

Authors:  Maria R Gualano; Fabrizio Bert; Valeria Adige; Robin Thomas; Gitana Scozzari; Roberta Siliquini
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.458

2.  Examining the Healthcare Administrator's Perspective on "Teamness" in Primary Care.

Authors:  Bianca K Frogner; Cyndy R Snyder; Jaime R Hornecker
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

3.  Team-Based Care for Cancer Survivors With Comorbidities: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michelle Doose; Dana Verhoeven; Janeth I Sanchez; Alicia A Livinski; Michelle Mollica; Veronica Chollette; Sallie J Weaver
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct 01       Impact factor: 1.028

4.  When less is more: validating a brief scale to rate interprofessional team competencies.

Authors:  Désirée A Lie; Regina Richter-Lagha; Christopher P Forest; Anne Walsh; Kevin Lohenry
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2017

5.  The development and validation of a new interprofessional team approach evaluation scale.

Authors:  Zalika Klemenc-Ketis; Irena Makivić; Antonija Poplas Susic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Applying Care Coordination Principles to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in People With Serious Mental Illness: A Case Study Approach.

Authors:  Karly A Murphy; Arlene Dalcin; Emma E McGinty; Stacy Goldsholl; Ann Heller; Gail L Daumit
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Cancer prevention, risk reduction, and control: opportunities for the next decade of health care delivery research.

Authors:  Denalee M O'Malley; Catherine M Alfano; Michelle Doose; Anita Y Kinney; Simon J Craddock Lee; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Paul Duberstein; Shawna V Hudson
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Effective Behaviors in Work Teams: Spanish Adaptation of the Individual Behavior Analysis Scale.

Authors:  Tomas Bonavia; Martín Julián
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-08

Review 9.  Interdisciplinary Health Care Evaluation Instruments: A Review of Psychometric Evidence.

Authors:  Hosung Joel Kang; Cecilia Flores-Sandoval; Benson Law; Shannon Sibbald
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.329

10.  Redesigning the Clinical Learning Environment to Improve Interprofessional Care and Education: Multi-Method Program Evaluation of the iPACE Pilot Unit.

Authors:  Sarah Hallen; Thomas Van der Kloot; Christyna McCormack; Paul K J Han; Frances L Lucas; Lisbeth Wierda; Daniel Meyer; Kalli Varaklis; Robert Bing-You
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.