Literature DB >> 2721193

The percutaneous electrocoagulation vasectomy technique--a comparative trial with the standard incision technique at Marie Stopes House, London.

T R Black1, D S Gates, K Lavely, P Lamptey.   

Abstract

One-hundred-and-one men requesting vasectomy in 1985 for the purpose of limiting family size were admitted to a study of standard incision and monopolar diathermy, and a new percutaneous electrocoagulation vasectomy procedure. Semen specimens were tested at 10 and 12 weeks after surgery. Men were telephoned at 2, 12 and 24 weeks post-surgery to elicit complications and complaints. Half of the men having the standard incision procedure and about one-third of the men undergoing the percutaneous procedure complained of discomfort during the surgery. At the two-week telephone contact, 23% of those having the standard incision and 66% of those having the percutaneous procedure reported complications. There were few complications or complaints reported at the long-term follow-up contacts with either method; although twice as many men in the percutaneous group were not declared sterile by the end of the study period. Failure rates were 2.0% for the standard incision procedure and 7.8% for the percutaneous approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2721193     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(89)90115-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  1 in total

Review 1.  Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.

Authors:  Lynley A Cook; Asha Pun; Maria F Gallo; Laureen M Lopez; Huib A A M Van Vliet
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.