OBJECTIVE: To investigate the direct and indirect associations between psychological and physical intimate partner violence and the occurrence of common mental disorders (CMD) and how they relate to the occurrence of household food insecurity (HFI). DESIGN: This was a population-based cross-sectional study. Intimate partner violence was assessed using the Brazilian version of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) and HFI was assessed using the Brazilian Food Insecurity Scale. The propositional analytical model was based on a review of the literature and was tested using path analysis. SETTING: Duque de Caxias, Greater Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (April-December 2010). SUBJECTS: Women (n 849) who had been in a relationship in the 12 months preceding the interview. RESULTS: Both psychological and physical violence were found to be major risk factors of HFI. Psychological violence was associated with HFI indirectly via physical violence and CMD, and directly by an unidentified path. The effects of physical violence seemed to be manifested exclusively through CMD. Most of the variables in the propositional model related to socio-economic position, demographic characteristics, degree of women's social support and partner alcohol misuse were retained in the 'final' model, indicating that these factors contribute significantly to the increased likelihood of HFI. CONCLUSIONS: The results reinforce the importance of considering domestic violence and other psychosocial aspects of family life when implementing interventions designed to reduce/eradicate HFI.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the direct and indirect associations between psychological and physical intimate partner violence and the occurrence of common mental disorders (CMD) and how they relate to the occurrence of household food insecurity (HFI). DESIGN: This was a population-based cross-sectional study. Intimate partner violence was assessed using the Brazilian version of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) and HFI was assessed using the Brazilian Food Insecurity Scale. The propositional analytical model was based on a review of the literature and was tested using path analysis. SETTING: Duque de Caxias, Greater Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (April-December 2010). SUBJECTS:Women (n 849) who had been in a relationship in the 12 months preceding the interview. RESULTS: Both psychological and physical violence were found to be major risk factors of HFI. Psychological violence was associated with HFI indirectly via physical violence and CMD, and directly by an unidentified path. The effects of physical violence seemed to be manifested exclusively through CMD. Most of the variables in the propositional model related to socio-economic position, demographic characteristics, degree of women's social support and partner alcohol misuse were retained in the 'final' model, indicating that these factors contribute significantly to the increased likelihood of HFI. CONCLUSIONS: The results reinforce the importance of considering domestic violence and other psychosocial aspects of family life when implementing interventions designed to reduce/eradicate HFI.
Authors: Jessica M Perkins; Viola N Nyakato; Bernard Kakuhikire; Alexander C Tsai; S V Subramanian; David R Bangsberg; Nicholas A Christakis Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Tiara C Willie; Kamila A Alexander; Amy Caplon; Trace S Kershaw; Cara B Safon; Rachel W Galvao; Clair Kaplan; Abigail Caldwell; Sarah K Calabrese Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2020-11-18