Arka Chatterjee1, Brigitta C Brott2, Robin Foley3, Oluseun Alli1, Mark Sasse1, Mustafa Ahmed1, Firas Al Solaiman1, Gautam Reddy1, Sameer Ather1, Massoud A Leesar4. 1. Division of Cardiology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, USA. 2. Division of Cardiology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama-Birmingham, USA. 3. Department of Material Science and Engineering, University of Alabama-Birmingham, USA. 4. Division of Cardiology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, USA. Electronic address: mleesar@uab.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSE: In coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL), hydrophilic guidewires used for side-branch (SB) protection can be withdrawn from underneath the stent easier than other wires. However, the safety of which has not been investigated. METHODS/MATERIALS: We performed scanning electron microscopic (SEM) examination of hydrophilic wires - the Whisper and Runthrough wires - used for SB protection during stenting and proximal optimization technique (POT) in 30 patients with CBL. The distal 15cm of the wire was examined every 1mm by SEM and 4500 segments were analyzed to investigate for wire fracture, polymer shearing (PS), and its correlations with post-stenting creatine kinase (CK)-MB release. RESULTS: SEM examination showed no evidence for wire fracture. The total area of PS and the largest defect on the wire were significantly larger with the Whisper wire versus the Runthrough wire (0.15±0.04mm2 vs. 0.026±0.01mm2 and 0.04±0.05mm2 vs. 0.01±0.01mm2; P<0.05, respectively). The total length of PS and the longest defect on the wire were significantly longer with the Whisper wire vs. the Runthrough wire (12.1±14.5mm vs. 2.7±3.0mm and 2.9±4.2mm vs. 1.0±1.2mm; P<0.05, respectively), but there were weak correlations between the extents of PS with CK-MB release. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrophilic guidewires may be safely used for SB protection during stenting and POT in CBLs. The extent of PS was significantly greater with the Whisper wire than with the Runthrough wire, but its correlation with post-stenting CK-MB release was weak.
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSE: In coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL), hydrophilic guidewires used for side-branch (SB) protection can be withdrawn from underneath the stent easier than other wires. However, the safety of which has not been investigated. METHODS/MATERIALS: We performed scanning electron microscopic (SEM) examination of hydrophilic wires - the Whisper and Runthrough wires - used for SB protection during stenting and proximal optimization technique (POT) in 30 patients with CBL. The distal 15cm of the wire was examined every 1mm by SEM and 4500 segments were analyzed to investigate for wire fracture, polymer shearing (PS), and its correlations with post-stenting creatine kinase (CK)-MB release. RESULTS: SEM examination showed no evidence for wire fracture. The total area of PS and the largest defect on the wire were significantly larger with the Whisper wire versus the Runthrough wire (0.15±0.04mm2 vs. 0.026±0.01mm2 and 0.04±0.05mm2 vs. 0.01±0.01mm2; P<0.05, respectively). The total length of PS and the longest defect on the wire were significantly longer with the Whisper wire vs. the Runthrough wire (12.1±14.5mm vs. 2.7±3.0mm and 2.9±4.2mm vs. 1.0±1.2mm; P<0.05, respectively), but there were weak correlations between the extents of PS with CK-MB release. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrophilic guidewires may be safely used for SB protection during stenting and POT in CBLs. The extent of PS was significantly greater with the Whisper wire than with the Runthrough wire, but its correlation with post-stenting CK-MB release was weak.