| Literature DB >> 27210060 |
Mara Buenting1, Tjark Mueller1, Tobias Raupach2, Georg Luers3, Uwe Wehrenberg4, Axel Gehl1, Sven Anders5.
Abstract
Despite increasing the integration of radiologic imaging teaching in anatomy dissection courses, studies on learning outcome of these interventions are rare or have certain shortcomings in study design. In this study, students were randomly allocated to an intervention group (n=53) receiving five weekly CT-courses of 30min duration during a 6-week gross anatomy course. Students in the control group (n=329) received no additional teaching. Total teaching time did not differ among groups. All students were asked to participate in a pre- and post-course self-assessment (comparative self-assessment; CSA) of learning objectives related to anatomical spatial relationships and a post-course formative assessment on radiologic anatomy. Items of both assessments were matched. Moreover, students of the intervention group were asked to evaluate the CT-courses. Most participants of the intervention group classified the CT-courses as "good" or "very good". Nevertheless, results of the CSA and formative assessment did not differ among study and control groups. These findings indicate that the teaching intervention (CT-courses) did not have an impact on recognition of anatomical structures in radiological images beyond the knowledge acquired in the anatomical dissection course. As a consequence, interventions integrating radiology imaging into dissection courses should be based on psychological considerations of how to best foster student learning. Learning outcome has to be monitored, as results of evaluation surveys can be misleading. Further research on curricular concepts is needed considering both short- and long-term effects.Entities:
Keywords: Anatomy teaching; Computed tomography; Medical education
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27210060 DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.05.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Anat ISSN: 0940-9602 Impact factor: 2.698