Literature DB >> 27210042

Genome Editing with CRISPR-Cas9: Can It Get Any Better?

Maximilian Haeussler1, Jean-Paul Concordet2.   

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas revolution is taking place in virtually all fields of life sciences. Harnessing DNA cleavage with the CRISPR-Cas9 system of Streptococcus pyogenes has proven to be extraordinarily simple and efficient, relying only on the design of a synthetic single guide RNA (sgRNA) and its co-expression with Cas9. Here, we review the progress in the design of sgRNA from the original dual RNA guide for S. pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SpCas9 and SaCas9). New assays for genome-wide identification of off-targets have provided important insights into the issue of cleavage specificity in vivo. At the same time, the on-target activity of thousands of guides has been determined. These data have led to numerous online tools that facilitate the selection of guide RNAs in target sequences. It appears that for most basic research applications, cleavage activity can be maximized and off-targets minimized by carefully choosing guide RNAs based on computational predictions. Moreover, recent studies of Cas proteins have further improved the flexibility and precision of the CRISPR-Cas toolkit for genome editing. Inspired by the crystal structure of the complex of sgRNA-SpCas9 bound to target DNA, several variants of SpCas9 have recently been engineered, either with novel protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) or with drastically reduced off-targets. Novel Cas9 and Cas9-like proteins called Cpf1 have also been characterized from other bacteria and will benefit from the insights obtained from SpCas9. Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 may also progress with better understanding and control of cellular DNA repair pathways activated after Cas9-induced DNA cleavage.
Copyright © 2016 Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Genetics Society of China. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR-Cas9 system; Genome editing; Guide RNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27210042      PMCID: PMC5708852          DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Genomics        ISSN: 1673-8527            Impact factor:   4.275


  87 in total

Review 1.  Genetic manipulation of genomes with rare-cutting endonucleases.

Authors:  M Jasin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Xuebing Wu; David A Scott; Andrea J Kriz; Anthony C Chiu; Patrick D Hsu; Daniel B Dadon; Albert W Cheng; Alexandro E Trevino; Silvana Konermann; Sidi Chen; Rudolf Jaenisch; Feng Zhang; Phillip A Sharp
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites.

Authors:  Sangsu Bae; Jiyeon Kweon; Heon Seok Kim; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Discovery and Functional Characterization of Diverse Class 2 CRISPR-Cas Systems.

Authors:  Sergey Shmakov; Omar O Abudayyeh; Kira S Makarova; Yuri I Wolf; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Ekaterina Semenova; Leonid Minakhin; Julia Joung; Silvana Konermann; Konstantin Severinov; Feng Zhang; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Mammalian Reverse Genetics without Crossing Reveals Nr3a as a Short-Sleeper Gene.

Authors:  Genshiro A Sunagawa; Kenta Sumiyama; Maki Ukai-Tadenuma; Dimitri Perrin; Hiroshi Fujishima; Hideki Ukai; Osamu Nishimura; Shoi Shi; Rei-Ichiro Ohno; Ryohei Narumi; Yoshihiro Shimizu; Daisuke Tone; Koji L Ode; Shigehiro Kuraku; Hiroki R Ueda
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Megabase-scale deletion using CRISPR/Cas9 to generate a fully haploid human cell line.

Authors:  Patrick Essletzbichler; Tomasz Konopka; Federica Santoro; Doris Chen; Bianca V Gapp; Robert Kralovics; Thijn R Brummelkamp; Sebastian M B Nijman; Tilmann Bürckstümmer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases.

Authors:  Shengdar Q Tsai; Zongli Zheng; Nhu T Nguyen; Matthew Liebers; Ved V Topkar; Vishal Thapar; Nicolas Wyvekens; Cyd Khayter; A John Iafrate; Long P Le; Martin J Aryee; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases revealed by multiplex Digenome-seq.

Authors:  Daesik Kim; Sojung Kim; Sunghyun Kim; Jeongbin Park; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system.

Authors:  Baohui Chen; Luke A Gilbert; Beth A Cimini; Joerg Schnitzbauer; Wei Zhang; Gene-Wei Li; Jason Park; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Jonathan S Weissman; Lei S Qi; Bo Huang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Rapid characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements.

Authors:  Tautvydas Karvelis; Giedrius Gasiunas; Joshua Young; Greta Bigelyte; Arunas Silanskas; Mark Cigan; Virginijus Siksnys
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Characterization of noncoding regulatory DNA in the human genome.

Authors:  Ran Elkon; Reuven Agami
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Emerging tools to study enteric neuromuscular function.

Authors:  Brian D Gulbransen
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA activity depends on free energy changes and on the target PAM context.

Authors:  Giulia I Corsi; Kunli Qu; Ferhat Alkan; Xiaoguang Pan; Yonglun Luo; Jan Gorodkin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Phytochrome Coordinates with a hnRNP to Regulate Alternative Splicing via an Exonic Splicing Silencer.

Authors:  Bou-Yun Lin; Chueh-Ju Shih; Hsin-Yu Hsieh; Hsiu-Chen Chen; Shih-Long Tu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Efficient Genome Engineering of a Virulent Klebsiella Bacteriophage Using CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Juntao Shen; Jinjie Zhou; Guo-Qiang Chen; Zhi-Long Xiu
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Synthetic Biology of Small RNAs and Riboswitches.

Authors:  Jordan K Villa; Yichi Su; Lydia M Contreras; Ming C Hammond
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2018-05

7.  Fluorescent RNA cytosine analogue - an internal probe for detailed structure and dynamics investigations.

Authors:  Anders Foller Füchtbauer; Søren Preus; Karl Börjesson; Scott A McPhee; David M J Lilley; L Marcus Wilhelmsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Patterns of CRISPR/Cas9 activity in plants, animals and microbes.

Authors:  Luisa Bortesi; Changfu Zhu; Julia Zischewski; Lucia Perez; Ludovic Bassié; Riad Nadi; Giobbe Forni; Sarah Boyd Lade; Erika Soto; Xin Jin; Vicente Medina; Gemma Villorbina; Pilar Muñoz; Gemma Farré; Rainer Fischer; Richard M Twyman; Teresa Capell; Paul Christou; Stefan Schillberg
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 9.  Application of the CRISPR/Cas9 System to Drug Resistance in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Yinnan Chen; Yanmin Zhang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 16.806

10.  Multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9 Targeting of Genes Implicated in Retinal Regeneration and Degeneration.

Authors:  Arife Unal Eroglu; Timothy S Mulligan; Liyun Zhang; David T White; Sumitra Sengupta; Cathy Nie; Noela Y Lu; Jiang Qian; Lisha Xu; Wuhong Pei; Shawn M Burgess; Meera T Saxena; Jeff S Mumm
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.