Literature DB >> 27209786

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) pollination in California's Central Valley is limited by native bee nest site location.

Hillary S Sardiñas, Kathleen Tom, Lauren Catherine Ponisio, Andrew Rominger, Claire Kremen.   

Abstract

The delivery of ecosystem services by mobile organisms depends on the distribution of those organisms, which is, in turn, affected by resources at local and landscape scales. Pollinator-dependent crops rely on mobile animals like bees for crop production, and the spatial relationship between floral resources and nest location for these central-place foragers influences the delivery of pollination services. Current models that map pollination coverage in agricultural regions utilize landscape-level estimates of floral availability and nesting incidence inferred from expert opinion, rather than direct assessments. Foraging distance is often derived from proxies of bee body size, rather than direct measurements of foraging that account for behavioral responses to floral resource type and distribution. The lack of direct measurements of nesting incidence and foraging distances may lead to inaccurate mapping of pollination services. We examined the role of local-scale floral resource presence from hedgerow plantings on nest incidence of ground-nesting bees in field margins and within monoculture, conventionally managed sunflower fields in California's Central Valley. We tracked bee movement into fields using fluorescent powder. We then used these data to simulate the distribution of pollination services within a crop field. Contrary to expert opinion, we found that ground-nesting native bees nested both in fields and edges, though nesting rates declined with distance into field. Further, we detected no effect of field-margin floral enhancements on nesting. We found evidence of an exponential decay rate of bee movement into fields, indicating that foraging predominantly occurred in less than 1% of medium-sized bees' predicted typical foraging range. Although we found native bees nesting within agricultural fields, their restricted foraging movements likely centralize pollination near nest sites. Our data thus predict a heterogeneous distribution of pollination services within sunflower fields, with edges receiving higher coverage than field centers. To generate more accurate maps of services, we advocate directly measuring the autecology of ecosystem service providers, which vary by crop system, pollinator species, and region. Improving estimates of the factors affecting pollinator populations can increase the accuracy of pollination service maps and help clarify the influence of farming practices on wild bees occurring in agricultural landscapes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27209786     DOI: 10.1890/15-0033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  4 in total

1.  Mass-flowering monoculture attracts bees, amplifying parasite prevalence.

Authors:  Hamutahl Cohen; Gordon P Smith; Hillary Sardiñas; Jocelyn F Zorn; Quinn S McFrederick; S Hollis Woodard; Lauren C Ponisio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  An assessment of the efficacy and peak catch rates of emergence tents for measuring bee nesting.

Authors:  Alexander M Pane; Alexandra N Harmon-Threatt
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 1.936

Review 3.  Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination.

Authors:  Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki; Anahí Espíndola; Adam J Vanbergen; Josef Settele; Claire Kremen; Lynn V Dicks
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis.

Authors:  Matthias Albrecht; David Kleijn; Neal M Williams; Matthias Tschumi; Brett R Blaauw; Riccardo Bommarco; Alistair J Campbell; Matteo Dainese; Francis A Drummond; Martin H Entling; Dominik Ganser; G Arjen de Groot; Dave Goulson; Heather Grab; Hannah Hamilton; Felix Herzog; Rufus Isaacs; Katja Jacot; Philippe Jeanneret; Mattias Jonsson; Eva Knop; Claire Kremen; Douglas A Landis; Gregory M Loeb; Lorenzo Marini; Megan McKerchar; Lora Morandin; Sonja C Pfister; Simon G Potts; Maj Rundlöf; Hillary Sardiñas; Amber Sciligo; Carsten Thies; Teja Tscharntke; Eric Venturini; Eve Veromann; Ines M G Vollhardt; Felix Wäckers; Kimiora Ward; Duncan B Westbury; Andrew Wilby; Megan Woltz; Steve Wratten; Louis Sutter
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 11.274

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.