Literature DB >> 27209584

Causal factors for position-related SSEP changes in spinal surgery.

Justin W Silverstein1,2, Eric Matthews3, Laurence E Mermelstein4, Hargovind DeWal4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are effective in detecting upper extremity positional injuries; however, causal factors for which patient population is most at risk are not well established.
PURPOSE: To review causal factors for intraoperative SSEP changes due to patient positioning. STUDY
DESIGN: A case series with retrospective chart analysis was performed. PATIENT SAMPLE: 398 patient charts and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring data from patients who underwent thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spine surgery were reviewed in a consecutive sequence from 2012 to 2013. OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse events (AE) with the upper extremity SSEP recordings were compared to the independent variables, sex, positioning, length of procedure, and body habitus.
METHODS: Thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spine surgeries using contemporaneous ulnar and median nerve SSEPs were reviewed. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, Chi-square, and independent samples t test were used to determine statistical significance in having an upper extremity SSEP AE to the aforementioned independent variables.
RESULTS: The sample consisted of 209 males (52.5 %) and 189 females (47.5 %) (n = 398). AE to the upper extremity SSEP was seen in 44 patients. Sex was found to be statistically significant for isolated ulnar nerve AE (P ≤ 0.001) with males being most at risk (87.5 %). AE for isolated median nerve SSEP was statistically significant for supine and prone positions (P = 0.043). Length of procedure was statically significant for isolated ulnar nerve SSEP AE (P = 0.039). BMI was statistically significant for generalized upper extremity SSEP AE (P = 0.016), as well as isolated ulnar SSEP AE (P = 0.006), isolated median SSEP AE (P ≤ 0.001) and contemporaneous median and ulnar SSEP AE of the same limb (P ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Sex, patient positioning, length of procedure, and BMI are determinants for upper extremity neural compromise during thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spine surgeries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring; Patient positioning; Positional nerve injury; Somatosensory evoked potentials; Spine surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27209584     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4618-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  44 in total

1.  The use of somatosensory evoked potentials to determine the relationship between patient positioning and impending upper extremity nerve injury during spine surgery: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Ihab R Kamel; Elizabeth T Drum; Stephen A Koch; Joseph A Whitten; John P Gaughan; Rodger E Barnette; Woodrow W Wendling
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Evoked potential monitoring of the upper extremities during thoracic and lumbar spinal deformity surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  M F O'Brien; L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; A Padberg; M Stokes
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1994-08

3.  The application of somatosensory-evoked potentials in orthopedic spine surgery.

Authors:  A Mostegl; R Bauer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1984

4.  Monitoring electrophysiologic function during carotid endarterectomy: a comparison of somatosensory evoked potentials and conventional electroencephalogram.

Authors:  A M Lam; P H Manninen; G G Ferguson; W Nantau
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Clinical Usefulness of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials for Detection of Peripheral Nerve and Brachial Plexus Injury Secondary to Malpositioning in Microvascular Decompression.

Authors:  Tingting Ying; Xuhui Wang; Hui Sun; Yinda Tang; Yan Yuan; Shiting Li
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.177

6.  Prevention of positional brachial plexopathy during surgical correction of scoliosis.

Authors:  D M Schwartz; D S Drummond; M Hahn; M L Ecker; J P Dormans
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-04

Review 7.  Brachial plexus injury following spinal surgery.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Jaya Kolla; Hesham Omar; Elias Dakwar; Naomi Abel; Devanand Mangar; Enrico Camporesi
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-10

8.  Subclinical ischemia verified by somatosensory evoked potential amplitude reduction during carotid endarterectomy: negative effects on cognitive performance.

Authors:  Tomohiro Inoue; Kazuhiro Ohwaki; Akira Tamura; Kazuo Tsutsumi; Isamu Saito; Nobuhito Saito
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of the brachial plexus to predict nerve injury during internal mammary artery harvest: intraoperative comparisons of the Rultract and Pittman sternal retractors.

Authors:  W S Jellish; J Martucci; B Blakeman; E Hudson
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring in corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Evaluation of 354 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Vishal K Kundnani; Lisa Zhu; Hh Tak; Hk Wong
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.251

View more
  1 in total

1.  Minimizing Blood Loss in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Mikhail; Zach Pennington; Paul M Arnold; Darrel S Brodke; Jens R Chapman; Norman Chutkan; Michael D Daubs; John G DeVine; Michael G Fehlings; Daniel E Gelb; George M Ghobrial; James S Harrop; Christian Hoelscher; Fan Jiang; John J Knightly; Brian K Kwon; Thomas E Mroz; Ahmad Nassr; K Daniel Riew; Lali H Sekhon; Justin S Smith; Vincent C Traynelis; Jeffrey C Wang; Michael H Weber; Jefferson R Wilson; Christopher D Witiw; Daniel M Sciubba; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-01-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.