Literature DB >> 27209538

Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Locally-advanced Prostate Cancer.

Giorgio Gandaglia1, Elisa De Lorenzis2, Giacomo Novara3, Nicola Fossati4, Ruben De Groote5, Zach Dovey3, Nazareno Suardi6, Francesco Montorsi6, Alberto Briganti6, Bernardo Rocco2, Alexandre Mottrie3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa).
OBJECTIVE: To describe our surgical technique of extrafascial RARP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) in locally advanced PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-four patients with clinical stage ≥T3 undergoing RARP with ePLND at three European centers between 2011 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Surgery was performed using the DaVinci Si system. The anatomically defined ePLND included nodes overlying the external iliac axis, those in the obturator fossa, and around the internal iliac artery up to the ureter. RARP was performed using an extrafascial approach where the Denonvillers' fascia was dissected free and left on the posterior surface of the seminal vesicles. MEASUREMENTS: Perioperative outcomes consisted of operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complications occurred within 30 d after surgery. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as two consecutive prostate-specific antigen values ≥0.2ng/ml. Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed time to BCR and clinical recurrence. Multivariable Cox regression analyses assessed predictors of BCR. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 230min, 200ml, and 6 d. Overall, 12 (12.7%) patients experienced complications and five (5.3%), four (4.3%), and three (3.2%) patients had Clavien I, II, and III/IV complications. Overall, 72 (76.6%), 35 (37.2%), and 30 (32.3%) patients had pT3/4, pN1, and positive margins. The median number of nodes removed was 16. Overall, 19 (20.2%) and 21 (22.3%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy and hormonal therapy. The median follow-up was 23.5 mo. At 3-yr follow-up, the BCR- and clinical recurrence-free survival rates were 63.3% and 95.8%. Pathologic stage, Gleason score, and positive margins represented predictors of BCR (all p≤0.03). Our study is limited by its retrospective nature and by the follow-up duration.
CONCLUSIONS: RARP represents a well-standardized, safe, and oncological effective option in patients with locally advanced PCa. Pathologic stage, Gleason score, and positive margins should be considered to select patients for multimodal approaches. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Robot-assisted surgery represents a well-standardized, safe, and oncological effective option in men with locally advanced prostate cancer. Two out of three patients treated with this approach are free from recurrence at 3-yr follow-up. Pathologic stage, Gleason score, and positive surgical margins represent predictors of BCR and should be considered to select patients for multimodal approaches.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extended pelvic lymph node dissection; Locally advanced; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robot assisted

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27209538     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  11 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic Value of Standard Versus Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michele Colicchia; Vidit Sharma; Firas Abdollah; Alberto Briganti; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy.

Authors:  Hiromichi Iwamura; Shingo Hatakeyama; Takuma Narita; Yusuke Ozaki; Sakae Konishi; Hirotaka Horiguchi; Hirotake Kodama; Yuta Kojima; Naoki Fujita; Teppei Okamoto; Yuki Tobisawa; Tohru Yoneyama; Hayato Yamamoto; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Relative Contribution of Sampling and Grading to the Quality of Prostate Biopsy: Results from a Single High-volume Institution.

Authors:  Carlo Andrea Bravi; Emily Vertosick; Amy Tin; Simone Scuderi; Giuseppe Fallara; Giuseppe Rosiello; Elio Mazzone; Marco Bandini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; Massimo Freschi; Rodolfo Montironi; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Andrew Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-24

Review 4.  Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Lijin Zhang; Bin Wu; Zhenlei Zha; Hu Zhao; Yuefang Jiang; Jun Yuan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  COL5A2 Promotes Proliferation and Invasion in Prostate Cancer and Is One of Seven Gleason-Related Genes That Predict Recurrence-Free Survival.

Authors:  Xiaohan Ren; Xinglin Chen; Kai Fang; Xu Zhang; Xiyi Wei; Tongtong Zhang; Guangyao Li; Zhongwen Lu; Ninghong Song; Shangqian Wang; Chao Qin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Artificial Intelligence Combined With Big Data to Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Liwei Wei; Yongdi Huang; Zheng Chen; Hongyu Lei; Xiaoping Qin; Lihong Cui; Yumin Zhuo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the treatment of patients with clinically high-risk localized and locally advanced prostate cancer: single surgeons functional and oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Tae Young Shin; Yong Seong Lee
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Increased body mass index is associated with operative difficulty during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Daniel D Shapiro; John W Davis; Wendell H Williams; Brian F Chapin; John F Ward; Curtis A Pettaway; Justin R Gregg
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-09-27

9.  Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joanne Nyaboe Nyarangi-Dix; Magdalena Görtz; Georgi Gradinarov; Luisa Hofer; Viktoria Schütz; Claudia Gasch; Jan Philipp Radtke; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Extended robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection as a monotherapy in patients with very high-risk prostate cancer Patients.

Authors:  Noriyoshi Miura; Naoya Sugihara; Keisuke Funaki; Toshio Kakuda; Kanae Koyama; Ryuta Watanabe; Yuichiro Sawada; Terutaka Noda; Kenichi Nishimura; Tetsuya Fukumoto; Yuki Miyauchi; Tadahiko Kikugawa; Takashi Saika
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.