Literature DB >> 27209155

The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.

Avinoam Borowsky1, William J Horrey2, Yulan Liang2, Angela Garabet2, Lucinda Simmons2, Donald L Fisher3.   

Abstract

Driver visual distraction is known to increase the likelihood of being involved in a crash, especially for long glances inside the vehicle. The detrimental impact of these in-vehicle glances may carry over and disrupt the ongoing processing of information after the driver glances back up on the road. This study explored the effect of different types of visual tasks inside the vehicle on the top-down processes that guide the detection and monitoring of road hazards after the driver glances back towards the road. Using a driving simulator, 56 participants were monitored with an eye tracking system while they navigated various hazardous scenarios in one of four experimental conditions. In all conditions, a potential hazard was visible 4-5s before the driver could strike the potential hazard were it to materialize. All interruptions were exactly two seconds in length. After the interruption the potential hazard again became visible for about a half-second after which the driver passed by the hazard. The nature of the in-vehicle visual interruption presented to the participants was varied across conditions: (1) Visual interruptions comprised of spatial, driving unrelated, tasks; (2) visual interruptions comprised of non-spatial, driving unrelated, tasks; (3) visual interruptions with no tasks added; and (4) no visual interruptions. In the first three conditions drivers glancing on the forward roadway was momentarily interrupted (either with or without a task) just after the potential hazard first became visible by the occurrence of an in-vehicle task lasting two seconds. In the last condition (no interruptions) the driver could not see the potential hazard after it just became visible because of obstructions in the built or natural environment. The obstruction (like the interruption) lasted for two seconds. In other words, across all conditions the hazard was visible, then became invisible, and finally became visible again. Importantly, the results show that the presence of an interruption (as opposed to an obstruction) negatively impacted drivers' ability to anticipate the potential hazard. Moreover, the various types of interruptions had differential effects on hazard detection. The implications of this study for the design of in-vehicle displays are discussed.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brief visual interruptions; Driver distraction; Eye movements; Hazard anticipation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27209155     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  4 in total

1.  Hazard Perception, Presence, and Simulation Sickness-A Comparison of Desktop and Head-Mounted Display for Driving Simulation.

Authors:  Sarah Malone; Roland Brünken
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-22

2.  Drivers' Visual Search Patterns during Overtaking Maneuvers on Freeway.

Authors:  Wenhui Zhang; Jing Dai; Yulong Pei; Penghui Li; Ying Yan; Xinqiang Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Eye tracking use in researching driver distraction: A scientometric and qualitative literature review approach.

Authors:  Tina Cvahte Ojstersek; Darja Topolsek
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 0.957

4.  A global and local perspective of interruption frequency in a visual search task.

Authors:  Tara Radović; Tobias Rieger; Dietrich Manzey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.