Literature DB >> 27209099

Shedder status-An analysis of self and non-self DNA in multiple handprints deposited by the same individuals over time.

M Goray1, S Fowler2, B Szkuta3, R A H van Oorschot4.   

Abstract

There are several studies that suggest that different people deposit different quantities of their own DNA on items they touch, i.e. some are good shedders and others are bad shedders. It is of interest to determine if individuals deposit consistent quantities of their own DNA, no matter the occasion, as well as the degree of variability among individuals. To investigate this, participants were tested for their ability to deposit DNA by placing right and left handprints on separate DNA-free glass plates at three set times during the day (morning, midday and afternoon) on four different days spaced over several weeks. Information regarding recent activities performed by the individual was recorded, along with information on gender, hand dominance and hand size. A total of 240 handprint deposits were collected from 10 individuals and analyzed for differences in DNA quantity and the type of the DNA profile obtained at different times of the day, on different days, between the two hands of the same individual, and between different individuals. Furthermore, the correlation between the deposit quantity and the ratio of self to non-self DNA in the mixed deposits was analyzed to determine if the amount of non-self DNA has an effect on overall DNA quantities obtained. In general, this study has shown that while there is substantial variation in the quantities deposited by individuals on different occasions, some clear trends were evident with some individuals consistently depositing significantly more or less DNA than others. Non-self DNA was usually deposited along with self DNA and, in most instances, was the minor component. Incidents where the non-self portion was the major component were very rare and, when observed, were associated with a poor depositor/shedder. Forensic DNA scientists need to consider the range and variability of DNA a person deposits when touching an object, the likelihood of non-self DNA being co-deposited onto the handled object of interest and the factors that may affect the relative quantity of this component within the deposit.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foreign DNA; Forensic; Shedder; Touch DNA; Transfer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27209099     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  9 in total

1.  "I've never been at the crime scene!" - gloves as carriers for secondary DNA transfer.

Authors:  Katrin Tanzhaus; Marie-Therese Reiß; Tom Zaspel
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Persistence of touch DNA on burglary-related tools.

Authors:  Céline M Pfeifer; Peter Wiegand
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Laundry in a washing machine as a mediator of secondary and tertiary DNA transfer.

Authors:  Lev Voskoboinik; Merav Amiel; Ayeleth Reshef; Ron Gafny; Mark Barash
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  STR typing of skin swabs from individuals after an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Roland Reibke; Katja Anslinger; Dagmar von Máriássy; Mareike Verbeek; Britta Gätjens; Roberta Schiller
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 5.  The diversity of shedder tests and a novel factor that affects DNA transfer.

Authors:  Max Schwender; Malte Bamberg; Lisa Dierig; Sebastian N Kunz; Peter Wiegand
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Evidence Collection and Analysis for Touch Deoxyribonucleic Acid in Groping and Sexual Assault Cases.

Authors:  Julie L Valentine; Paige Presler-Jur; Heather Mills; Suzanne Miles
Journal:  J Forensic Nurs       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 1.175

7.  Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: An experimental study.

Authors:  Francesco Sessa; Monica Salerno; Giuseppe Bertozzi; Giovanni Messina; Pietrantonio Ricci; Caterina Ledda; Venerando Rapisarda; Santina Cantatore; Emanuela Turillazzi; Cristoforo Pomara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.

Authors:  John M Butler; Sheila Willis
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Who Packed the Drugs? Application of Bayesian Networks to Address Questions of DNA Transfer, Persistence, and Recovery from Plastic Bags and Tape.

Authors:  Ane Elida Fonneløp; Sara Faria; Gnanagowry Shanthan; Peter Gill
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.