Literature DB >> 27208537

Impact of chemotherapy in uterine sarcoma (UtS): review of 13 clinical trials from the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) involving advanced/metastatic UtS compared to other soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients treated with first line chemotherapy.

I Ray-Coquard1, E Rizzo2, J Y Blay3, P Casali4, I Judson5, A Krarup Hansen6, L H Lindner7, A P Dei Tos8, H Gelderblom9, S Marreaud2, S Litière2, P Rutkowski10, P Hohenberger11, A Gronchi4, W T van der Graaf12.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: UtS are a group of uncommon tumors representing 1% of malignant neoplasms of the female genital tract, and 7% of sarcomas. The objective of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with the clinical behavior UtS.
METHODS: Information on 269 patients with advanced or metastatic first line UtS treated by chemotherapy was available in a database containing information on 3270 patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) entered in EORTC-STBSG clinical trials between 1977 and 2010. The chemotherapy was aggregated in 4 categories: anthracyclines alone, ifosfamide alone, the combination of doxorubicin and ifosfamide, and CYVADIC.
RESULTS: Among the 269 UtS pts, there were 231 deaths (median OS 10.4months, 95% CI: 9.1-11.9) and 257 progressions and/or deaths (median PFS 4.1months, 95% CI: 3.5-4.9). Multivariate analyses reported PS (p<0.001) only to be a statistically significant prognostic factor for OS in UtS; for PFS, LMS histology (p=0.025) is associated with a better outcome. There was no relationship between the 4 groups of chemotherapy regimens and impact on clinical outcomes. Histological subtype was significantly correlated with response to chemotherapy (RR: LMS 19% vs other 33%, p=0.026). Ifosfamide single agent yielded only 5% of RR.
CONCLUSIONS: Clearly, UtS are very aggressive neoplasms with poor outcome when treated with chemotherapy consisting of anthracyclines with or without ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide. New strategies are urgently needed.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Sarcoma; Treatment; Uterine

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27208537     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  3 in total

Review 1.  Uterine sarcoma - current perspectives.

Authors:  Charlotte Benson; Aisha B Miah
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-08-31

2.  Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in seven patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis from uterine sarcoma.

Authors:  Armando Sardi; Carlos A Muñoz-Zuluaga; Michelle Sittig; Teresa Diaz-Montes
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2018-05-02

3.  The systemic treatment of uterine leiomyosarcomas: A systematic review. No news is good news?

Authors:  Anastasios Kyriazoglou; Michalis Liontos; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos; Maria Gavriatopoulou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.