Literature DB >> 27207686

Student-Athletes' Views on APOE Genotyping for Increased Risk of Poor Recovery after a Traumatic Brain Injury.

Laura S Hercher1, Michelle Caudle2, Julie Griffin3, Matthew Herzog4, Diana Matviychuk5, Jenna Tidwell6.   

Abstract

Use of apolipoprotein E genotyping to personalize the risk of a poor recovery after traumatic brain injury is complicated by the potential for genetic discrimination and the potential to reveal an increased risk for late onset Alzheimer's disease. We developed a survey to gauge interest in testing among athletes participating in National Collegiate Athletic Association programs. Eight hundred and forty seven student-athletes were surveyed to determine their interest in genetic testing, their willingness to share the results of testing with parents, coaches and physicians, their concerns about privacy and/or discrimination, and their interest in genetic counseling. Nearly three quarters of respondents expressed some level of interest in testing, with the largest number describing themselves as 'possibly interested' (54.9 %, n = 463) and a smaller number describing themselves as 'very interested' (18.9 %, n = 159). Most student-athletes said that receiving secondary information about their risk for late-onset Alzheimer's disease made them more likely to test (50.6 %, n = 426) rather than less likely to test (12.4 %, n = 104). Student-athletes were open to apolipoprotein E genotyping and willing to share test results with their parents, coaches and physicians. They did not anticipate that test results would impact their behavior or ability to play. Testing programs may be welcome but should provide clear information as to risks and benefits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APOE; Alzheimer’s disease; Apolipoprotein genotyping; Genetic discrimination; Genetic testing; NCAA; Traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27207686     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9965-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  17 in total

Review 1.  The complexities of predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  J P Evans; C Skrzynia; W Burke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-28

Review 2.  Sickle cell trait testing and athletic participation: a solution in search of a problem?

Authors:  Alexis A Thompson
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2013

Review 3.  Genetic factors in outcome after traumatic brain injury: what the human genome project can teach us about brain trauma.

Authors:  Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Victoria K Baxter
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.710

4.  Association of apolipoprotein E polymorphism with outcome after head injury.

Authors:  G M Teasdale; J A Nicoll; G Murray; M Fiddes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Two decades of advances in understanding of mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ronald Ruff
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.710

6.  A policy impact analysis of the mandatory NCAA sickle cell trait screening program.

Authors:  Beth A Tarini; Margaret Alison Brooks; David G Bundy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 and short-term recovery from predominantly mild brain injury.

Authors:  Joshua N Liberman; Walter F Stewart; Keith Wesnes; Juan Troncoso
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-04-09       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  W J Strittmatter; A M Saunders; D Schmechel; M Pericak-Vance; J Enghild; G S Salvesen; A D Roses
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis. APOE and Alzheimer Disease Meta Analysis Consortium.

Authors:  L A Farrer; L A Cupples; J L Haines; B Hyman; W A Kukull; R Mayeux; R H Myers; M A Pericak-Vance; N Risch; C M van Duijn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Oct 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Genetic counseling and testing for Alzheimer disease: joint practice guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Jill S Goldman; Susan E Hahn; Jennifer Williamson Catania; Susan LaRusse-Eckert; Melissa Barber Butson; Malia Rumbaugh; Michelle N Strecker; J Scott Roberts; Wylie Burke; Richard Mayeux; Thomas Bird
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical implications of APOE genotyping for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) risk estimation: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Victoria S Marshe; Ilona Gorbovskaya; Sarah Kanji; Maxine Kish; Daniel J Müller
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 2.  Genetic findings in sport-related concussions: potential for individualized medicine?

Authors:  Jane McDevitt; Evgeny Krynetskiy
Journal:  Concussion       Date:  2017-01-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.