Literature DB >> 27207454

NEDA status in highly active MS can be more easily obtained with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation than other drugs.

Maria Pia Sormani1, Paolo A Muraro2, Riccardo Saccardi3, Gianluigi Mancardi4.   

Abstract

The no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) composite measure has emerged as one attractive new target of therapies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), consisting of the following features: (1) no relapses, (2) no disability progression, and (3) no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity (new or enlarging T2 lesions or Gd-enhancing lesions). Achievement of NEDA status in patients receiving a disease-modifying therapy (DMT) seems to be an ambitious but ideal goal for therapies in RRMS. Recently, published post hoc analyses of clinical trials reported percentages of RRMS patients maintaining the NEDA status after 2 years of therapy ranging between 13% and 46%. Long-term assessment of NEDA patients in real-life settings showed very low probability to be NEDA in the long run. Against this scenario, immunoablative therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) demonstrated the potential to maintain a much higher proportion of NEDA patients at 2 years (ranging from 78% to 83%) and also at 5 years (ranging from 60% to 68%). This is even more relevant when considering that MS patients who underwent aHSCT are much more active than patients usually enrolled in clinical trials. The emerging evidence of the efficacy of this therapeutic approach in early aggressive and treatment-resistant RRMS calls for the organization of a randomized comparative trial to fully evaluate the risk-benefit profile of aHSCT in patients with highly active MS not responding to DMTs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  No evidence of disease activity; disease-modifying therapies; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; multiple sclerosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27207454     DOI: 10.1177/1352458516645670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   6.312


  25 in total

Review 1.  Five Questions Answered: A Review of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Harold L Atkins; Mark S Freedman
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Assessing treatment outcomes in multiple sclerosis trials and in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Carmen Tur; Marcello Moccia; Frederik Barkhof; Jeremy Chataway; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Alan J Thompson; Olga Ciccarelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  Self-reported changes in the expanded disability status scale score in patients with multiple sclerosis after autologous stem cell transplants: real-world data from a single center.

Authors:  G J Ruiz-Argüelles; J C Olivares-Gazca; M Olivares-Gazca; A A Leon-Peña; I Murrieta-Alvarez; Y Cantero-Fortiz; G B Gomez-Cruz; A Ruiz-Argüelles; M Priesca-Marin; G J Ruiz-Delgado
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Effect of Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation vs Continued Disease-Modifying Therapy on Disease Progression in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Richard K Burt; Roumen Balabanov; Joachim Burman; Basil Sharrack; John A Snowden; Maria Carolina Oliveira; Jan Fagius; John Rose; Flavia Nelson; Amilton Antunes Barreira; Kristina Carlson; Xiaoqiang Han; Daniela Moraes; Amy Morgan; Kathleen Quigley; Kimberly Yaung; Regan Buckley; Carri Alldredge; Allison Clendenan; Michelle A Calvario; Jacquelyn Henry; Borko Jovanovic; Irene B Helenowski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Application of stem cell transplantation in autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  Sue-Ann Ng; Keith M Sullivan
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.284

6.  aHSCT is superior to alemtuzumab in maintaining NEDA and improving cognition in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Vivien Häußler; Friederike Ufer; Jana Pöttgen; Christine Wolschke; Manuel A Friese; Nicolaus Kröger; Christoph Heesen; Jan-Patrick Stellmann
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.511

Review 7.  Cell Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Pamela Sarkar; Claire M Rice; Neil J Scolding
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.497

Review 8.  Newer Treatment Approaches in Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Gabrielle Macaron; Jenny Feng; Manikum Moodley; Mary Rensel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.972

Review 9.  Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Paolo A Muraro; Roland Martin; Giovanni Luigi Mancardi; Richard Nicholas; Maria Pia Sormani; Riccardo Saccardi
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 10.  A review of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases: multiple sclerosis, systemic sclerosis and Crohn's disease. Position paper of the Brazilian Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  Maria Carolina Oliveira; Juliana Bernardes Elias; Daniela Aparecida de Moraes; Belinda Pinto Simões; Morgani Rodrigues; Andreza Alice Feitosa Ribeiro; Lilian Piron-Ruiz; Milton Arthur Ruiz; Nelson Hamerschlak
Journal:  Hematol Transfus Cell Ther       Date:  2020-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.