Literature DB >> 27207139

Medial sural artery perforator flap in head and neck reconstruction.

Heval Selman Özkan1, Saime İrkören2, Osman Enver Aydın2, Aylin Eryılmaz3, Hüray Karaca2.   

Abstract

Medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap is a relatively new flap which is a modification of medial gastrocnemius myocutaneous flap. Both radial forearm flap and MSAP has common benefits, such as thinness, long pedicle and pliability; however, MSAP has lower donor site morbidity when compared with radial forearm flap. Because of this reason, the MSAP flap has gained popularity during the last decade. The objective of this study was to determine clinical application results of this flap in reconstruction of post-oncologic defects in the head and neck region. 11 patients operated for head and neck post oncologic defects and reconstructed with MSAP between June 2014 and Dec 2015 were included in the study. Age, gender, histopathology, area of reconstruction, flap size, number of perforators were reviewed. Postoperatively recipient and donor site complications, hospital stay and additional surgical procedures were also analyzed. We had seven uncomplicated cases; one total flap failure due to arterial problem, in three cases due fistula formation and local wound healing problems additional surgeries were performed. All venous anastomosis were performed with 9/0 sutures, nine arterial anastomosis were performed with 9/0 and two arterial anastomosis were performed with 10/0 nylon sutures. Medial sural artery perforator flap is a good alternative in head and neck reconstruction, with the advantages of thin and pliable skin, a reliable vascular pedicle, straightforward intramuscular dissection. But there are certain drawbacks like tedious pedicle and perforator dissection, small arterial pedicle size which complicates anastomosis and obscurities of anatomy. Surgical team must always be ready for a difficult micro anastomosis and an alternative flap choice must be prepared and counseled with the patient in case of inadequate perforators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck reconstruction; MSAP flap; Microsurgical reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27207139     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4078-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  14 in total

1.  The anatomy of several free flap donor sites.

Authors:  G I Taylor; R K Daniel
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Anatomic basis of the gastrocnemius perforator-based flap.

Authors:  G G Hallock
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  Anatomical basis and versatile application of the free medial sural artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Huang-Kai Kao; Kai-Ping Chang; Ying-An Chen; Fu-Chan Wei; Ming-Huei Cheng
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  New design and identification of the medial sural perforator flap: an anatomical study and its clinical applications.

Authors:  Hyo Heon Kim; Jae Ho Jeong; Jung Hyun Seul; Byung Chae Cho
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Chimeric gastrocnemius muscle and sural artery perforator local flap.

Authors:  Geoffrey G Hallock
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 6.  Medial sural artery perforator flap.

Authors:  Xue-Tao Xie; Yi-Min Chai
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  A prospective study of medial sural artery perforator flap with computed tomographic angiography-aided design in tongue reconstruction.

Authors:  Yue He; Shu-Fang Jin; Zhi-Yuan Zhang; Shao-Qing Feng; Chen-Ping Zhang; Yi-Xin Zhang
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap: Using the Superficial Venous System to Minimize Flap Congestion.

Authors:  John Ranson; Anais Rosich-Medina; Kavit Amin; Damir Kosutic
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-11-16

9.  Comparison of the medial sural artery perforator flap with the radial forearm flap for head and neck reconstructions.

Authors:  Huang-Kai Kao; Kai-Ping Chang; Fu-Chan Wei; Ming-Huei Cheng
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 10.  Anterolateral thigh flap.

Authors:  Chin-Ho Wong; Fu-Chan Wei
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.147

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Do medial sural artery perforator flaps have better clinical outcomes compared to the rectus abdominis perforator (DIEAP) flap in reconstruction of glossectomy defects? A Prisma guided meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rathindra Nath Bera; Preeti Tiwari
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-07-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.