| Literature DB >> 27207069 |
Shuqing Li1,2, Lina Song1, Yaguo Jin1, Shuwei Liu1, Qirong Shen2, Jianwen Zou3,4.
Abstract
Manure composting has been recognized as an important anthropogenic source of nitrous oxide (Entities:
Keywords: Biochar; Denitrifying genes abundance; Manure composting; Modeling; Nitrous oxide
Year: 2016 PMID: 27207069 PMCID: PMC4875572 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-016-0208-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
The primers used for quantitative PCR in this study
| Gene | Name | Sequence (5′–3′) | Thermal profile | No. cycles | Product size (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ATCATGGTSCTGCCGCG | 30 s-95 °C, | 1 | 473 | Henry et al. ( |
|
| GCCTCGATCAGRTTGTGGTT | 95 °C-5 s, 58 °C-34 s, 72 °C-15 s 95 °C-15 s, 55 °C-30 s, 72 °C-30 s, 80 °C-30 s | 40 | |||
|
|
| AGAACGACCAGCTGATCGACA | 30 s-95 °C, | 1 | 300 | Scala and Kerkhof ( |
|
| TCCATGGTGACGCCGTGGTTG | 95 °C-5 s, 60 °C-34 s, 72 °C-15 s 95 °C-15 s, 55 °C-30 s, 72 °C-30 s, | 40 | |||
|
| 515F | GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGG | 30 s-95 °C, | 1 | 392 | Zhou et al. ( |
| 907R | CCGTCAATTCMTTTRAGTTT | 95 °C-5 s, 55 °C-34 s, 72 °C-15 s 95 °C-15 s, 55 °C-30 s,72 °C-30 s, 80 °C-30 s | 40 |
M A/C, R A/G
Fig. 1Changes in N2O emission rate during the windrow composting (mean ± 1 SD)
Fig. 2The cumulative N2O emissions during the 65-day period of composting
Fig. 3Changes in temperature (a) and moisture (b) of composting materials during the windrow composting process
The concentration of NH4 + and NO3 − during the composting process
| Composting | NH4 +(mg/kg) | NO3 − (mg/kg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | Biochar | CK | Biochar | |
| 5 | 1026.45 ± 156.30 | 1150.39 ± 123.72 | 143.08 ± 21.95 | 151.68 ± 16.33 |
| 12 | 608.99 ± 89.77 | 552.07 ± 89.23 | 179.55 ± 17.40 | 205.35 ± 36.72 |
| 14 | 547.95 ± 101.23 | 580.66 ± 78.01 | 182.57 ± 29.80 | 192.59 ± 9.70 |
| 17 | 568.46 ± 45.89 | 552.64 ± 46.93 | 157.66 ± 31.90 | 175.10 ± 23.89 |
| 26 | 558.96 ± 56.11 | 580.70 ± 23.43 | 141.73 ± 10.91 | 168.62 ± 30.01 |
| 34 | 498.31 ± 30.03 | 573.46 ± 92.10 | 247.79 ± 27.18 | 177.87 ± 29.55 |
| 47 | 415.75 ± 56.30 | 544.38 ± 64.02 | 345.26 ± 38.45 | 218.10 ± 48.74 |
| 56 | 113.93 ± 19.78 | 212.17 ± 59.30 | 593.70 ± 68.29 | 541.83 ± 83.29 |
| 65 | 125.02 ± 34.04 | 288.12 ± 32.91 | 591.53 ± 56.48 | 503.60 ± 76.20 |
Data was presented as mean ± standard error
Fig. 4Changes in gene copy numbers per gram of compost (dry matter) for 16S rRNA. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SE) of triplicate q-PCR reactions
Fig. 5Dynamics of population of nirK (a) and nosZ (b) and the nirK gene abundance minus nosZ gene abundance (c) during the windrow composting process. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SE)
Fig. 6a Correlation analysis between N2O emission and physiochemical/microbial factors. b Simple regression analysis of N2O emission and the nirK gene abundance minus nosZ gene abundance
Fig. 7A schematic model for explaining the N2O fluxes dynamics associated with abundance of nirK and nosZ