| Literature DB >> 27207069 |
Shuqing Li1,2, Lina Song1, Yaguo Jin1, Shuwei Liu1, Qirong Shen2, Jianwen Zou3,4.
Abstract
Manure composting has been recognized as an important anthropogenic source of nitrous oxide (N2O) contributing to global warming. However, biochar effect on N2O emissions from manure composting is rarely evaluated, especially by linking it to abundance of denitrifying bacteria community. Results of this study indicated that biochar amendment significantly reduced N2O emissions from manure composting, primarily due to suppression of the nirK gene abundance of denitrifying bacteria. Pearson's correlation analysis showed a significant positive correlation between nirK abundance and N2O fluxes, while a negative correlation between nosZ density and N2O fluxes. Simultaneously, a linear correlation between nirK gene abundance minus nosZ gene abundance with N2O fluxes was also observed. In addition, a statistical model for estimating N2O emissions based on the bacterial denitrifying functional genes was developed and verified to adequately fit the observed emissions. Our results highlighted that biochar amendment would be an alternative strategy for mitigating N2O emissions during manure composting, and the information of related functional bacterial communities could be helpful for understanding the mechanism of N2O emissions.Entities:
Keywords: Biochar; Denitrifying genes abundance; Manure composting; Modeling; Nitrous oxide
Year: 2016 PMID: 27207069 PMCID: PMC4875572 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-016-0208-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
The primers used for quantitative PCR in this study
| Gene | Name | Sequence (5′–3′) | Thermal profile | No. cycles | Product size (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ATCATGGTSCTGCCGCG | 30 s-95 °C, | 1 | 473 | Henry et al. ( |
|
| GCCTCGATCAGRTTGTGGTT | 95 °C-5 s, 58 °C-34 s, 72 °C-15 s 95 °C-15 s, 55 °C-30 s, 72 °C-30 s, 80 °C-30 s | 40 | |||
|
|
| AGAACGACCAGCTGATCGACA | 30 s-95 °C, | 1 | 300 | Scala and Kerkhof ( |
|
| TCCATGGTGACGCCGTGGTTG | 95 °C-5 s, 60 °C-34 s, 72 °C-15 s 95 °C-15 s, 55 °C-30 s, 72 °C-30 s, | 40 | |||
|
| 515F | GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGG | 30 s-95 °C, | 1 | 392 | Zhou et al. ( |
| 907R | CCGTCAATTCMTTTRAGTTT | 95 °C-5 s, 55 °C-34 s, 72 °C-15 s 95 °C-15 s, 55 °C-30 s,72 °C-30 s, 80 °C-30 s | 40 |
M A/C, R A/G
Fig. 1Changes in N2O emission rate during the windrow composting (mean ± 1 SD)
Fig. 2The cumulative N2O emissions during the 65-day period of composting
Fig. 3Changes in temperature (a) and moisture (b) of composting materials during the windrow composting process
The concentration of NH4 + and NO3 − during the composting process
| Composting | NH4 +(mg/kg) | NO3 − (mg/kg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | Biochar | CK | Biochar | |
| 5 | 1026.45 ± 156.30 | 1150.39 ± 123.72 | 143.08 ± 21.95 | 151.68 ± 16.33 |
| 12 | 608.99 ± 89.77 | 552.07 ± 89.23 | 179.55 ± 17.40 | 205.35 ± 36.72 |
| 14 | 547.95 ± 101.23 | 580.66 ± 78.01 | 182.57 ± 29.80 | 192.59 ± 9.70 |
| 17 | 568.46 ± 45.89 | 552.64 ± 46.93 | 157.66 ± 31.90 | 175.10 ± 23.89 |
| 26 | 558.96 ± 56.11 | 580.70 ± 23.43 | 141.73 ± 10.91 | 168.62 ± 30.01 |
| 34 | 498.31 ± 30.03 | 573.46 ± 92.10 | 247.79 ± 27.18 | 177.87 ± 29.55 |
| 47 | 415.75 ± 56.30 | 544.38 ± 64.02 | 345.26 ± 38.45 | 218.10 ± 48.74 |
| 56 | 113.93 ± 19.78 | 212.17 ± 59.30 | 593.70 ± 68.29 | 541.83 ± 83.29 |
| 65 | 125.02 ± 34.04 | 288.12 ± 32.91 | 591.53 ± 56.48 | 503.60 ± 76.20 |
Data was presented as mean ± standard error
Fig. 4Changes in gene copy numbers per gram of compost (dry matter) for 16S rRNA. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SE) of triplicate q-PCR reactions
Fig. 5Dynamics of population of nirK (a) and nosZ (b) and the nirK gene abundance minus nosZ gene abundance (c) during the windrow composting process. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SE)
Fig. 6a Correlation analysis between N2O emission and physiochemical/microbial factors. b Simple regression analysis of N2O emission and the nirK gene abundance minus nosZ gene abundance
Fig. 7A schematic model for explaining the N2O fluxes dynamics associated with abundance of nirK and nosZ