| Literature DB >> 27206989 |
Hafiza Fizzah Riaz1, Shaheen Mannan1, Sajid Malik2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rahim Yar Khan (RYK) District is a multi-ethnic assemblage of both ancient and migrated communities in Southern Punjab, Pakistan. There is a paucity of knowledge on the bio-demographic structure of this endogamous population.Entities:
Keywords: Child morbidity; Child mortality; Consanguinity; Fertility; Genetic epidemiology; Inbreeding coefficient; Pakistan; Rahim Yar Khan; Sex ratio; Southern Punjab
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27206989 PMCID: PMC5026024 DOI: 10.1186/s41043-016-0049-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Distribution of major types of marital unions in four tehsils of RYK District
| Consanguineous unions: no.(%) | Non-consanguineous unions: no.(%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tehsils | Double first cousin | First cousin | First cousin once removed | Second cousin | Second cousin once removed | Distantly related/ | Non-related | All marriages |
| Sadiqabad | 11 (1.2) | 477 (50.7) | 23 (2.4) | 16 (1.7) | 5 (0.5) | 345 (36.7) | 64 (6.8) | 941 |
| Rahim Yar Khan | 7 (1.2) | 343 (57.4) | 24 (4.0) | 3 (0.5) | 2 (0.3) | 214 (35.8) | 5 (0.8) | 598 |
| Khanpur | 7 (1.2) | 287 (49.7) | 28 (4.8) | 6 (1.0) | 1 (0.2) | 247 (42.7) | 2 (0.4) | 578 |
| Liaquatpur | 2 (3.5) | 22 (38.6) | 15 (26.3) | 0 | 0 | 18 (31.6) | 0 | 57 |
| Total | 27 (1.2) | 1129 (51.9) | 90 (4.1) | 25 (1.2) | 8 (0.4) | 824 (37.9) | 71 (3.3) | 2174 |
Distribution of consanguineous unions, total marriages, and IC-F across geographic location, mother tongue, and caste systems
| Variable | Consanguineous unions | Total marriages | Bivariate logistic regression OR | IC-F | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | % | No | % | |||
|
| ||||||
| Sadiqabad | 527 | 56.0 | 941 | 43.3 | 1.00 | 0.0342 |
| Rahim Yar Khan | 377 | 63.0 | 598 | 27.5 | 1.34* | 0.0386 |
| Khanpur | 328 | 56.8 | 578 | 26.6 | 1.03 | 0.0342 |
| Liaquatpur | 39 | 68.4 | 57 | 2.6 | 1.70 | 0.0367 |
| Total | 1271 | 58.5 | 2174 | 100.0 | 0.0355 | |
| Rural/urban origin* | ||||||
| Rural | 844 | 60.7 | 1390 | 63.9 | 1.29* | 0.0370 |
| Urban | 427 | 54.5 | 784 | 36.1 | 1.00 | 0.0327 |
| Mother tongue* | ||||||
| Punjabi | 499 | 45.2 | 1105 | 50.8 | 1.00 | 0.0278 |
| Saraiki | 706 | 75.4 | 937 | 43.1 | 3.71* | 0.0454 |
| Urdu | 23 | 46.0 | 50 | 2.3 | 0.99 | 0.0275 |
| Others | 43 | 52.4 | 82 | 3.8 | 1.66 | 0.0309 |
| Caste system** ( | ||||||
| Araina | 239 | 39.0 | 613 | 28.2 | 1.00 | 0.0239 |
| Malikb | 67 | 77.9 | 86 | 4.0 | 5.52* | 0.0458 |
| Arainb | 54 | 80.6 | 67 | 3.1 | 6.50* | 0.0483 |
| Balouchb | 50 | 58.1 | 86 | 4.0 | 2.17* | 0.0338 |
| Bhattib | 37 | 74.0 | 50 | 2.3 | 4.45* | 0.0441 |
| Juta | 49 | 45.0 | 109 | 5.0 | 1.28 | 0.0288 |
| Khokharb | 41 | 91.1 | 45 | 2.1 | 16.04* | 0.0535 |
| Larrb | 37 | 84.1 | 44 | 2.0 | 8.27* | 0.0526 |
| Malika | 28 | 58.3 | 48 | 2.2 | 2.19* | 0.0332 |
| Mughala | 22 | 51.2 | 43 | 2.0 | 1.64 | 0.0334 |
| Rajputa | 72 | 53.7 | 134 | 6.2 | 1.82* | 0.0332 |
| Sheikhb | 37 | 80.4 | 46 | 2.1 | 6.43* | 0.0530 |
aPredominantly Punjabi speaking
bPredominantly Saraiki speaking
^Pushto speaking
*Distribution was statistically significant; **caste systems with sample size ≥42 are shown
Fig. 1Bar graph depicting CU and NCU (at the left Y-axis) and IC-F (in black diamonds; at the right Y-axis) in four tehsils of Rahim Yar Khan District
Distribution of consanguineous unions, total marriages, and IC-F in various socio-demographic variables of subjects
| Variable | Consanguineous unions | Total marriages | Bivariate logistic regression OR | IC-F | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | No. | % | |||
| Education* | ||||||
| Illiterate | 564 | 65.6 | 860 | 39.6 | 2.33* | 0.0396 |
| Religious education/ | 399 | 63.4 | 629 | 28.9 | 2.12* | 0.0383 |
| Literate (all) | 308 | 45.0 | 685 | 31.5 | 1.00 | 0.0278 |
| Literacy level (years of schooling) | ||||||
| Up to 8 years | 146 | 47.4 | 308 | 14.2 | 0.67 | 0.0301 |
| 9–12 years | 128 | 44.6 | 287 | 13.2 | 0.89 | 0.0265 |
| >12 years | 34 | 37.8 | 90 | 4.1 | 1.00 | 0.0236 |
| Subjects’ age group (years) | ||||||
| Up to 25 | 342 | 54.7 | 625 | 28.8 | 1.00 | 0.0328 |
| 26–50 | 781 | 59.4 | 1315 | 60.5 | 0.75* | 0.0363 |
| >50 | 148 | 63.3 | 234 | 10.8 | 0.83 | 0.0379 |
| Marriage arrangement ( | ||||||
| Arranged marriage | 736 | 50.2 | 1466 | 69.2 | 1.00 | 0.0306 |
| Self-arranged | 27 | 79.4 | 34 | 1.6 | 3.83* | 0.0455 |
| Reciprocal ( | 470 | 76.2 | 617 | 29.2 | 3.17* | 0.0466 |
| Family/household type ( | ||||||
| Nuclear | 695 | 60.2 | 1154 | 54.7 | 1.12 | 0.0367 |
| Grandparent-and-one-couple | 292 | 57.5 | 508 | 24.1 | 1.00 | 0.0347 |
| Extended family | 244 | 54.7 | 446 | 21.2 | 0.89 | 0.0337 |
| Occupation of husband* | ||||||
| Unskilled manual | 423 | 67.1 | 632 | 29.1 | 1.94* | 0.0406 |
| Agriculture/farming | 288 | 59.9 | 481 | 22.1 | 1.45* | 0.0362 |
| Office job/services | 239 | 51.7 | 462 | 21.3 | 1.04 | 0.0313 |
| Business/sales | 217 | 50.7 | 428 | 19.7 | 1.00 | 0.0315 |
| Skilled manual | 68 | 63.0 | 108 | 5.0 | 1.79* | 0.0378 |
| Unemployed | 12 | 70.6 | 17 | 0.8 | – | 0.0368 |
| Late/deceased | 24 | 52.2 | 46 | 2.1 | – | 0.0313 |
| Parental marriage type ( | ||||||
| Consanguineous | 725 | 74.7 | 970 | 48.5 | 4.05* | 0.0453 |
| Non-consanguineous | 434 | 42.2 | 1028 | 51.5 | 1.00 | 0.0256 |
*Distribution was statistically significant
Multivariate analysis of socio-demographic variables associated with CU
| Socio-demographic variable | OR | Std.Err. |
| 95 % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 (without caste system) | ||||
| Mother tongue | ||||
| Saraiki | 2.01 | 0.26 | <0.0001 | 1.55–2.60 |
| Literacy | ||||
| Religious education | 1.31 | 0.18 | 0.040 | 1.01–1.71 |
| Illiterate | 1.42 | 0.19 | 0.008 | 1.10–1.83 |
| Marriage arrangement | ||||
| Reciprocal marriage | 1.82 | 0.25 | <0.0001 | 1.39–2.37 |
| Parental marriage type | ||||
| Consanguineous union | 3.06 | 0.32 | <0.0001 | 2.50–3.75 |
| Model 2 (with Caste-system) | ||||
| Caste-system | ||||
| Khokhar | 5.41 | 3.20 | 0.004 | 1.70–17.25 |
| Mother tongue | ||||
| Saraiki | 1.93 | 0.61 | 0.038 | 1.04–3.59 |
| Literacy | ||||
| Illiterate | 1.41 | 0.22 | 0.024 | 1.05–1.91 |
| Marriage arrangement | ||||
| Reciprocal marriage | 1.64 | 0.29 | 0.006 | 1.15–2.33 |
| Parental marriage type | ||||
| Consanguineous union | 2.87 | 0.35 | <0.0001 | 2.25–3.65 |
Types and distribution of first cousin unions in RYK population
| Variable | First cousin marriage type |
| % in total marriages | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBD | FSD | MBD | MSD | |||
|
| ||||||
| Sadiqabad | 166 | 120 | 95 | 93 | 474 | 50.4 |
| Rahim Yar Khan | 107 | 90 | 64 | 81 | 342 | 57.2 |
| Khanpur | 76 | 72 | 68 | 71 | 287 | 49.7 |
| Liaquatpur | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 15.8 |
| Total | 350 | 285 | 227 | 250 | 1112 | 51.1 |
| Rural/urban origin | ||||||
| Rural | 250 | 189 | 146 | 154 | 739 | 53.2 |
| Urban | 100 | 96 | 81 | 96 | 373 | 47.6 |
| Mother tongue* | ||||||
| Punjabi | 122 | 118 | 104 | 110 | 454 | 41.1 |
| Saraiki | 212 | 152 | 106 | 129 | 599 | 63.9 |
| Education | ||||||
| Illiterate | 157 | 125 | 86 | 106 | 474 | 57.3 |
| Religious education/ | 112 | 81 | 76 | 77 | 346 | 54.8 |
| Literate | 82 | 81 | 65 | 68 | 296 | 41.3 |
*Distribution was statistically significant
Subject’s fertility and live births in consanguineous and non-consanguineous unions
| Parameter | Consanguineous union | Non-consanguineous union | Total |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average age of subjects | 34.99 ± 13.36 | 35.16 ± 13.31 | 35.06 ± 13.34 |
|
| Fertility | ||||
| Ever pregnant women (no.) | 1,138 | 820 | 1,958 | |
| Ever pregnant women (%) | 91.9 | 89.6 | 90.9 | |
| Total pregnancies (no.) | 5058 | 3423 | 8481 | |
| Fertility: pregnancy/women (mean ± SD) | 4.08 ± 2.98 | 3.74 ± 2.81 | 3.94 ± 2.91 |
|
| Currently pregnant (no.) | 84 | 66 | 150 | |
| Currently pregnant (%) | 6.78 | 7.21 | 6.96 | |
| Live births | ||||
| Total live births (no.) | 4479 | 3024 | 7503 | |
| Live births/women (mean ± SD) | 3.62 ± 2.68 | 3.30 ± 2.50 | 3.48 ± 2.61 |
|
| Live birth: sons (no.) | 2350 | 1505 | 3855 | |
| Live birth: sons (mean ± SD) | 1.90 ± 1.64 | 1.64 ± 1.47 | 1.79 ± 1.58 |
|
| Live birth: daughters (no.) | 2129 | 1519 | 3648 | |
| Live birth: daughters (mean ± SD) | 1.72 ± 1.61 | 1.66 ± 1.59 | 1.69 ± 1.60 |
|
*Differences were highly significant; **differences were more highly significant (the statistical findings/significance did not differ when analyses were repeated through Mann-Whitney test and unpaired t test with Welch’s correction were performed)
Fig. 2Flow chart showing the analyses scheme and the differentials in various parameters between consanguineous and non-consanguineous samples. Arrows in upward direction depict higher estimates in the respective sample and downward the lower estimates. Black arrows show that the differences in the distribution between the consanguineous and non-consanguineous samples were significant, while white arrows demonstrate non-significant distribution
Prenatal and postnatal mortality and child morbidity in the consanguineous and non-consanguineous unions
| Parameter | Consanguineous union | Non-consanguineous union | Total |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortalities | ||||
| Data available on mothers (no.) | 1239 | 915 | 2,154 | |
| Total mortalities (no.) | 579 | 399 | 978 | |
| Mortality/women (mean ± SD) | 0.47 ± 1.11 | 0.44 ± 1.17 | 0.45 ± 1.14 |
|
| Prenatal mortality (no.) | 316 | 249 | 565 | |
| Prenatal mortality (mean ± SD) | 0.26 ± 0.85 | 0.27 ± 0.93 | 0.26 ± 0.88 |
|
| Postnatal mortality (no.) | 263 | 150 | 413 | |
| Postnatal mortality (mean ± SD) | 0.21 ± 0.73 | 0.16 ± 0.74 | 0.19 ± 0.73 |
|
| Child morbidity (no.) | ||||
| Mortality in sons | 43 | 36 | 79 |
|
| Mortality in daughters | 41 | 24 | 65 | |
| Total mortality | 84 | 60 | 144 | |