Literature DB >> 27206550

Long-term functional outcomes of patients with very mild stroke: does a NIHSS score of 0 mean no disability? An interim analysis of the KOSCO study.

Won Hyuk Chang1, Min Kyun Sohn2, Jongmin Lee3, Deog Young Kim4, Sam-Gyu Lee5, Yong-Il Shin6, Gyung-Jae Oh7, Yang-Soo Lee8, Min Cheol Joo9, Eun Young Han10, Min Su Kim9, Shin Yi Jang11, Jeong Hyun Kim1, Yun-Hee Kim1,12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the long-term functional outcomes of stroke patients with very mild severity at 6 months after stroke.
METHODS: This study presents the interim results of the Korean Stroke Cohort for Functioning and Rehabilitation. On day 7, stroke evaluation was performed using the functional assessment battery including the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). At 6 months after stroke, functional outcomes using the face-to-face functional assessment battery including Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were analyzed in the patients who had a score of 0 on the NIHSS at 7 days after stroke onset.
RESULTS: In the very mild stroke group, 455 patients were followed up at 6 months. Out of these patients, 11.0% had impairments in cognitive function, 14.1% had motor impairment, and 2.1% had impairments in their mobility measured by the functional assessment battery. At 6 months after onset, 3.3% of stroke survivors without recurrence showed dependency according to the FIM.
CONCLUSIONS: Many acute stroke patients with mild stroke severity as assessed by the NIHSS had impairments in various functional domains, and could have been easily overlooked for intensive rehabilitation therapy. Candidates for comprehensive rehabilitation therapy might be better identified by the functional assessment battery. Implications for rehabilitation Many acute stroke patients with mild stroke severity assessed by NIHSS could be easily overlooked for intensive rehabilitation therapy. Candidates for comprehensive rehabilitation therapy should be evaluated using a functional assessment battery rather than the NIHSS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohort; function; independence; stroke; very mild severity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27206550     DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1170214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  6 in total

1.  Inconsistent Classification of Mild Stroke and Implications on Health Services Delivery.

Authors:  Pamela S Roberts; Shilpa Krishnan; Suzanne Perea Burns; Debra Ouellette; Monique R Pappadis
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Long-term performance of instrumental activities of daily living in young and middle-aged stroke survivors-Impact of cognitive dysfunction, emotional problems and fatigue.

Authors:  Charlotte Blomgren; Hans Samuelsson; Christian Blomstrand; Christina Jern; Katarina Jood; Lisbeth Claesson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Nurses' experiences of communicating with patients with aphasia.

Authors:  Yujin Hur; Younhee Kang
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-11-06

Review 4.  Transitional and Long-Term Rehabilitation Care System After Stroke in Korea.

Authors:  Ja-Ho Leigh; Won-Seok Kim; Dong-Gyun Sohn; Won Kee Chang; Nam-Jong Paik
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Application Values of Six Scoring Systems in the Prognosis of Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Qun-Xi Li; Xiao-Jing Zhao; Hai-Yan Fan; Xiang-Nan Li; Da-Li Wang; Xiu-Jie Wang; Jiang Zhang; Rui-Ying Chen; Li Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Reduced thiamine is a predictor for cognitive impairment of cerebral infarction.

Authors:  Liang Feng; Weilei He; Guiqian Huang; Shasha Lin; Chengxiang Yuan; Haoran Cheng; Jincai He; Yiming Liu
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.708

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.