Literature DB >> 27206510

Quantitative Comparison of Tandem Mass Spectra Obtained on Various Instruments.

Fanni Laura Bazsó1, Oliver Ozohanics2, Gitta Schlosser3, Krisztina Ludányi4, Károly Vékey1,5, László Drahos6,7.   

Abstract

The similarity between two tandem mass spectra, which were measured on different instruments, was compared quantitatively using the similarity index (SI), defined as the dot product of the square root of peak intensities in the respective spectra. This function was found to be useful for comparing energy-dependent tandem mass spectra obtained on various instruments. Spectral comparisons show the similarity index in a 2D "heat map", indicating which collision energy combinations result in similar spectra, and how good this agreement is. The results and methodology can be used in the pharma industry to design experiments and equipment well suited for good reproducibility. We suggest that to get good long-term reproducibility, it is best to adjust the collision energy to yield a spectrum very similar to a reference spectrum. It is likely to yield better results than using the same tuning file, which, for example, does not take into account that contamination of the ion source due to extended use may influence instrument tuning. The methodology may be used to characterize energy dependence on various instrument types, to optimize instrumentation, and to study the influence or correlation between various experimental parameters. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Keywords:  Instrument comparison; Similarity; Tandem mass spectrometry

Year:  2016        PMID: 27206510     DOI: 10.1007/s13361-016-1408-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  17 in total

1.  Comparing similar spectra: from similarity index to spectral contrast angle.

Authors:  Katty X Wan; Ilan Vidavsky; Michael L Gross
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Similarity among tandem mass spectra from proteomic experiments: detection, significance, and utility.

Authors:  David L Tabb; Michael J MacCoss; Christine C Wu; Scott D Anderson; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Tandem mass spectrometric analysis of a mixture of isobars using the survival yield technique.

Authors:  Antony Memboeuf; Laure Jullien; Rémy Lartia; Bernard Brasme; Yves Gimbert
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 4.  Leucine enkephalin--a mass spectrometry standard.

Authors:  Judit Sztáray; Antony Memboeuf; László Drahos; Károly Vékey
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 10.946

5.  Optimization and testing of mass spectral library search algorithms for compound identification.

Authors:  S E Stein; D R Scott
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Comparison of algorithms and databases for matching unknown mass spectra.

Authors:  F W McLafferty; M Y Zhang; D B Stauffer; S Y Loh
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Size effect on fragmentation in tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Antony Memboeuf; Andreas Nasioudis; Sergio Indelicato; Ferenc Pollreisz; Akos Kuki; Sándor Kéki; Oscar F van den Brink; Károly Vékey; László Drahos
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Pivotal role of computers and software in mass spectrometry - SEQUEST and 20 years of tandem MS database searching.

Authors:  John R Yates
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Extending the coverage of spectral libraries: a neighbor-based approach to predicting intensities of peptide fragmentation spectra.

Authors:  Chao Ji; Randy J Arnold; Kevin J Sokoloski; Richard W Hardy; Haixu Tang; Predrag Radivojac
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  Methods for peptide identification by spectral comparison.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Alexander W Bell; John J M Bergeron; Corey M Yanofsky; Brian Carrillo; Christian E H Beaudrie; Robert E Kearney
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 2.480

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Identification of small molecules using accurate mass MS/MS search.

Authors:  Tobias Kind; Hiroshi Tsugawa; Tomas Cajka; Yan Ma; Zijuan Lai; Sajjan S Mehta; Gert Wohlgemuth; Dinesh Kumar Barupal; Megan R Showalter; Masanori Arita; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 10.946

2.  Proton affinities and ion enthalpies.

Authors:  John L Holmes; Nick A van Huizen; Peter C Burgers
Journal:  Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester)       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.067

3.  Tailoring to Search Engines: Bottom-Up Proteomics with Collision Energies Optimized for Identification Confidence.

Authors:  Ágnes Révész; Márton Gyula Milley; Kinga Nagy; Dániel Szabó; Gergő Kalló; Éva Csősz; Károly Vékey; László Drahos
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.466

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.