M R Boland1, R Ni Cearbhaill2, K Fitzpatrick2, S M Walsh2, D Evoy2, J Geraghty2, J Rothwell2, S McNally3, A O'Doherty3, C M Quinn4, E W McDermott2, R S Prichard2. 1. The Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St.Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. michaelboland@rcsi.ie. 2. The Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St.Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. 3. The Department of Radiology, St.Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland. 4. The Department of Pathology, St.Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Axillary status remains an important prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Certain patients with a positive sentinel node (SLNB) may not benefit from axillary clearance (AC). Uncertainty remains if this approach could be applied to patients diagnosed with axillary metastases on ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (USFNAC). The aim of this study was to compare nodal burden in patients with positive USFNAC and a positive SLNB. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed involving all BC patients between 2007 and 2014 who had either pre-operative USFNAC or a SLNB. Patient/tumour characteristics and nodal burden were examined in all patients proceeding to AC. RESULTS: 974 patients were eligible for analysis. 439 patients (45 %) had positive USFNAC and 535 (55 %) had a positive SLNB. USFNAC-positive patients were more likely to undergo mastectomy (Chi-square test; p < 0.001), have extra-nodal extension (p < 0.001), be oestrogen receptor negative (p < 0.001) and be HER2 positive (p < 0.001). The median total number of lymph nodes (LNs) excised during AC was higher in the USFNAC group (Mann-Whitney test; 23 vs. 21; p < 0.001). The median total number of involved LNs was 3 (range 1-47) in FNAC-positive patients versus 1 (range 1-37) in SLNB-positive patients (p < 0.001). The median number of involved LNs in level 1 was 3 in FNAC-positive patients versus 1 in SLNB-positive patients (p < 0.001). Within the SLN-positive group, 49 % of the patients had only one involved LN, 28 % had two nodes involved and 23 % had ≥3. In comparison, within the FNAC-positive group only 13 % of the patients had one involved LN, 12 % had two nodes involved and 74 % had ≥3. CONCLUSION: Patients with positive USFNAC have more aggressive clinico-pathological characteristics and higher nodal burden compared to SLNB-positive patients. Currently, the authors advocate that patients not receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with a positive USFNAC, should proceed directly to an axillary ALND.
INTRODUCTION: Axillary status remains an important prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Certain patients with a positive sentinel node (SLNB) may not benefit from axillary clearance (AC). Uncertainty remains if this approach could be applied to patients diagnosed with axillary metastases on ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (USFNAC). The aim of this study was to compare nodal burden in patients with positive USFNAC and a positive SLNB. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed involving all BC patients between 2007 and 2014 who had either pre-operative USFNAC or a SLNB. Patient/tumour characteristics and nodal burden were examined in all patients proceeding to AC. RESULTS: 974 patients were eligible for analysis. 439 patients (45 %) had positive USFNAC and 535 (55 %) had a positive SLNB. USFNAC-positive patients were more likely to undergo mastectomy (Chi-square test; p < 0.001), have extra-nodal extension (p < 0.001), be oestrogen receptor negative (p < 0.001) and be HER2 positive (p < 0.001). The median total number of lymph nodes (LNs) excised during AC was higher in the USFNAC group (Mann-Whitney test; 23 vs. 21; p < 0.001). The median total number of involved LNs was 3 (range 1-47) in FNAC-positive patients versus 1 (range 1-37) in SLNB-positive patients (p < 0.001). The median number of involved LNs in level 1 was 3 in FNAC-positive patients versus 1 in SLNB-positive patients (p < 0.001). Within the SLN-positive group, 49 % of the patients had only one involved LN, 28 % had two nodes involved and 23 % had ≥3. In comparison, within the FNAC-positive group only 13 % of the patients had one involved LN, 12 % had two nodes involved and 74 % had ≥3. CONCLUSION:Patients with positive USFNAC have more aggressive clinico-pathological characteristics and higher nodal burden compared to SLNB-positive patients. Currently, the authors advocate that patients not receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with a positive USFNAC, should proceed directly to an axillary ALND.
Authors: M R Boland; R S Prichard; I Daskalova; A J Lowery; D Evoy; J Geraghty; J Rothwell; C M Quinn; A O'Doherty; E W McDermott Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2015-01-24 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Armando E Giuliano; Kelly K Hunt; Karla V Ballman; Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Linda M McCall; Monica Morrow Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Viviana Galimberti; Bernard F Cole; Stefano Zurrida; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Paolo Veronesi; Paola Baratella; Camelia Chifu; Manuela Sargenti; Mattia Intra; Oreste Gentilini; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Giovanni Mazzarol; Samuele Massarut; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Janez Zgajnar; Hanne Galatius; Angelo Recalcati; David Littlejohn; Monika Bamert; Marco Colleoni; Karen N Price; Meredith M Regan; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates; Richard D Gelber; Umberto Veronesi Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Judy C Boughey; Vera J Suman; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Bret Taback; A Marilyn Leitch; Henry M Kuerer; Monet Bowling; Teresa S Flippo-Morton; David R Byrd; David W Ollila; Thomas B Julian; Sarah A McLaughlin; Linda McCall; W Fraser Symmans; Huong T Le-Petross; Bruce G Haffty; Thomas A Buchholz; Heidi Nelson; Kelly K Hunt Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: B J van Wely; J H W de Wilt; P J C Schout; B Kooistra; C A P Wauters; D Venderinck; L J A Strobbe Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-06-30 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Joao V Horvat; Elizabeth A Morris; Blanca Bernard-Davila; Danny F Martinez; Doris Leithner; Rosa Elena Ochoa-Albiztegui; Sunitha B Thakur; Katja Pinker Journal: Breast J Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 2.431