Literature DB >> 2720576

Pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of oral morphine solution and controlled-release morphine tablets in cancer patients.

M P Thirlwell1, P A Sloan, J A Maroun, G J Boos, J G Besner, J H Stewart, B M Mount.   

Abstract

Twenty-three adult patients with chronic pain due to cancer completed a double-blind, randomized, two-phase crossover trial comparing plasma morphine concentrations and analgesic efficacy of oral morphine sulfate solution (MSS) and controlled-release morphine sulfate tablets (MS Contin [MSC], Purdue Frederick, Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada). MS Contin was given every 12 hours to all patients except those whose daily morphine dose could not be equally divided into two 12-hour doses with the tablet strengths available. MSS was given every 4 hours. Patients received both of the test drugs for at least 5 days, and, on the final day of each phase, peripheral venous blood samples for morphine analysis were obtained. Eighteen patients received MSC every 12 hours, and five received it every 8 hours. The same total daily morphine dose was given in both phases. In the 18 patients who received MSC every 12 hours, the daily morphine dose was 183.9 +/- 140.0 mg (mean +/- SD). In this group, the mean area under the curve (AUC) with MSC was 443.6 +/- 348.4 ng/ml/hour, compared with 406.8 +/- 259.7 ng/ml/hour for MSS (P greater than 0.20). Mean maximum morphine concentrations (Cmax) for MSC and MSS were 67.9 +/- 42.1 and 58.8 +/- 30.3 ng/ml, respectively (P greater than 0.05). Mean minimum morphine concentrations (Cmin) were 17.0 +/- 17.7 and 18.3 +/- 15.0, respectively (P greater than 0.30). There was a significant difference (P less than 0.001) between the two drugs in time required to reach maximum morphine concentration (Tmax). Mean Tmax after MSC occurred at 3.6 +/- 2.3 hours. After MSS, it occurred at 1.3 +/- 0.4 hours. In the five patients who received MSC every 8 hours, the findings paralleled those in the principal group, with no significant differences between MSC and MSS in Cmax or Cmin and a highly significant difference between the two in Tmax. However, in this small group of patients, the AUC with MSC was significantly (P = 0.04) greater than that with MSS. All patients had very good pain control throughout the study and both formulations were well tolerated. There were no significant differences between MSC and MSS in pain scores or side effects. Under the conditions of this study there was no clinically significant difference in bioavailability between MSC and oral MSS. When given on a 12-hourly basis in individually titrated doses, the MSC provided therapeutic plasma morphine concentrations throughout the dosing interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2720576     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890601)63:11<2275::aid-cncr2820631136>3.0.co;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

Review 1.  The role of plant-derived drugs and herbal medicines in healthcare.

Authors:  P A De Smet
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Oral morphine for cancer pain.

Authors:  Philip J Wiffen; Bee Wee; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-22

3.  Kapanol™ capsules : pellet formulation provides alternative methods of administration of sustained-release morphine sulfate.

Authors:  R Jones; E Hale; L Talomsin; R Phillips
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Opioids and matrix metalloproteinases: the influence of morphine on MMP-9 production and cancer progression.

Authors:  Samira Khabbazi; Mohammadhossein Hassanshahi; Alireza Hassanshahi; Yaser Peymanfar; Yu-Wen Su; Cory J Xian
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Effectiveness and safety of oral extended-release oxymorphone for the treatment of cancer pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  Paul Sloan; Neal Slatkin; Harry Ahdieh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Preoperative oral administration of fast-release morphine sulfate reduces postoperative piritramide consumption.

Authors:  Ana Reiter; Ernest Zulus; Thomas Hartmann; Klaus Hoerauf
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 7.  Controlled clinical trials in cancer pain. How controlled should they be? A qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  R F Bell; T Wisløff; C Eccleston; E Kalso
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Review of oral oxymorphone in the management of pain.

Authors:  Paul Sloan
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  In silico (computed) modelling of doses and dosing regimens associated with morphine levels above international legal driving limits.

Authors:  Jason W Boland; Miriam Johnson; Diana Ferreira; David J Berry
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.762

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.