Christina H Fang1, Sei Yeon Chung, Danielle M Blake, Alejandro Vazquez, Chengrui Li, John P Carey, Howard W Francis, Robert W Jyung. 1. *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York †Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey ‡Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut §Department of Statistics and Biostatistics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey ||Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of cochlear-facial dehiscence (CFD) and to examine the influence of otic capsule area, age, sex, and race on CFD. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study of archived temporal bone specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Targeted sections from 1,020 temporal bone specimens were scanned and examined for CFD. Cochlear-facial partition width (CFPW) and otic capsule area (OCA), a marker of bone thickness, were measured using image analysis software. Demographic data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean CFPW was 0.23 mm (range, 0-0.92 mm; SD, 0.15 mm). Six patients were completely dehiscent (0.59%). Fallopian canal width, age, sex, race, and OCA were found to be significant predictors of CFPW. Age was found to be negatively correlated with CFPW (β = -0.001) (p < 0.005). Thicker CFPW was associated with males (β = 0.024) and non-Caucasian individuals (β = 0.031). The mean OCA for dehiscent specimens (mean, 9.48 mm; range, 6.65-11.58 mm; SD 3.21 mm) was significantly smaller than the mean OCA for nondehiscent specimens, (mean, 12.88 mm; range, 6.63-21.92 mm; SD, 2.47 mm) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: CFD occurred in nearly 0.6% of specimens in this temporal bone collection. Close to 35% of patients were sufficiently thin (<0.1 mm) to appear dehiscent on computed tomography scanning. Smaller OCA correlated with thinner CFPW, suggesting a developmental factor. Older, female, and Caucasian patients may have a greater risk for CFD and its associated symptoms.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of cochlear-facial dehiscence (CFD) and to examine the influence of otic capsule area, age, sex, and race on CFD. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study of archived temporal bone specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Targeted sections from 1,020 temporal bone specimens were scanned and examined for CFD. Cochlear-facial partition width (CFPW) and otic capsule area (OCA), a marker of bone thickness, were measured using image analysis software. Demographic data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean CFPW was 0.23 mm (range, 0-0.92 mm; SD, 0.15 mm). Six patients were completely dehiscent (0.59%). Fallopian canal width, age, sex, race, and OCA were found to be significant predictors of CFPW. Age was found to be negatively correlated with CFPW (β = -0.001) (p < 0.005). Thicker CFPW was associated with males (β = 0.024) and non-Caucasian individuals (β = 0.031). The mean OCA for dehiscent specimens (mean, 9.48 mm; range, 6.65-11.58 mm; SD 3.21 mm) was significantly smaller than the mean OCA for nondehiscent specimens, (mean, 12.88 mm; range, 6.63-21.92 mm; SD, 2.47 mm) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION:CFD occurred in nearly 0.6% of specimens in this temporal bone collection. Close to 35% of patients were sufficiently thin (<0.1 mm) to appear dehiscent on computed tomography scanning. Smaller OCA correlated with thinner CFPW, suggesting a developmental factor. Older, female, and Caucasian patients may have a greater risk for CFD and its associated symptoms.
Authors: Alfonso Scarpa; Massimo Ralli; Claudia Cassandro; Federico Maria Gioacchini; Antonio Greco; Arianna Di Stadio; Matteo Cavaliere; Donato Troisi; Marco de Vincentiis; Ettore Cassandro Journal: J Int Adv Otol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 1.017
Authors: P Ashley Wackym; Heather T Mackay-Promitas; Shaban Demirel; Gerard J Gianoli; Martin S Gizzi; Dale M Carter; David A Siker Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2017-08-22
Authors: Katherine D Heidenreich; Paul R Kileny; Sameer Ahmed; Hussam K El-Kashlan; Tori L Melendez; Gregory J Basura; Marci M Lesperance Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Emerson E Lee; Nicholas S Andresen; Bryan McKenzie; Jeffrey D Sharon; Howard W Francis; Daniel Q Sun Journal: World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2021-01-24