Literature DB >> 27203809

Prevention of neurological complications using a neural monitoring system with a finger electrode in the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach.

Wataru Narita1,2, Ryota Takatori1, Yuji Arai1, Masateru Nagae1, Hitoshi Tonomura1, Tatsuro Hayashida2, Taku Ogura2, Hiroyoshi Fujiwara1, Toshikazu Kubo1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) is a minimally disruptive surgical procedure that uses a lateral approach. There is, however, concern about the development of neurological complications when this approach is used, particularly at the L4-5 level. The authors performed a prospective study of the effects of a new neural monitoring system using a finger electrode to prevent neurological complications in patients treated with XLIF and compared the results to results obtained in historical controls. METHODS The study group comprised 36 patients (12 male and 24 female) who underwent XLIF for lumbar spine degenerative spondylolisthesis or lumbar spine degenerative scoliosis at L4-5 or a lower level. Using preoperative axial MR images obtained at the mid-height of the disc at the treated level, we calculated the psoas position value (PP%) by dividing the distance from the posterior border of the vertebral disc to the posterior border of the psoas major muscle by the anteroposterior diameter of the vertebral disc. During the operation, the psoas major muscle was dissected using an index finger fitted with a finger electrode, and threshold values of the dilator were recorded before and after dissection. Eighteen cases in which patients had undergone the same procedure for the same indications but without use of the finger electrode served as historical controls. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, PP values, clinical results, and neurological complications were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS The mean PP% values in the control and finger electrode groups were 17.5% and 20.1%, respectively (no significant difference). However, 6 patients in the finger electrode group had a rising psoas sign with PP% values of 50% or higher. The mean threshold value before dissection in the finger electrode group was 13.1 ± 5.9 mA, and this was significantly increased to 19.0 ± 1.5 mA after dissection (p < 0.001). A strong negative correlation was found between PP% and threshold values before dissection, but there was no correlation with threshold values after dissection. The thresholds after dissection improved to 11 mA or higher in all patients. There were no serious neurological complications in any patient, but there was a significantly lower incidence of transient neurological symptoms in the finger electrode group (7 [38%] of 18 cases vs 5 [14%] of 36 cases, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS The new neural monitoring system using a finger electrode may be useful to prevent XLIF-induced neurological complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion; BLN-VAS = VAS for gluteal and lower limb numbness; BLP-VAS= VAS for gluteal and lower-limb pain; BMI = body mass index; JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; LBP-VAS = VAS for low-back pain; PP% = psoas position (expressed as a percentage); VAS = visual analog scale; XLIF; XLIF = extreme lateral interbody fusion; complications; extreme lateral interbody fusion; finger electrode; lumbar; minimally invasive spine stabilization; neural monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27203809     DOI: 10.3171/2016.1.SPINE151069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  3 in total

1.  Effect of three-dimensional rotational deformity correction in surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis using lumbar lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Ryota Takatori; Taku Ogura; Wataru Narita; Tatsuro Hayashida; Kazuya Tanaka; Hitoshi Tonomura; Masateru Nagae; Yasuo Mikami; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-01-27

2.  Efficacy and safety of a modified lateral lumbar interbody fusion in L4-5 lumbar degenerative diseases compared with traditional XLIF and OLIF: a retrospective cohort study of 156 cases.

Authors:  Jiaqi Li; Yapeng Sun; Lei Guo; Fei Zhang; Wenyuan Ding; Wei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Many Intraoperative Monitoring Modalities Have Been Developed To Limit Injury During Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF/MIS XLIF): Does That Mean XLIF/MIS XLIF Are Unsafe?

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-11-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.