OBJECTIVES: Sub-Saharan African countries have substantially scaled-up safe male circumcision (SMC) services. However, it is unclear whether services are reaching men most at risk of HIV and whether there is behavioral disinhibition after SMC. We compared characteristics of SMC acceptors and nonacceptors in Rakai, Uganda. DESIGN: Cohort design. METHODS: Through the Rakai Community Cohort Study, baseline characteristics of 587 non-Muslim men who subsequently accepted SMC were compared with those of 4907 uncircumcised non-Muslim men. Behaviors after SMC were compared with those of men who remained uncircumcised. Poisson multivariable regression was used to estimate adjusted prevalence rate ratios of behaviors in circumcised versus uncircumcised men. RESULTS: At baseline (pre-SMC), men subsequently circumcised were younger (mean = 26.1 years), as compared with the uncircumcised (mean = 28.5 years, P < 0.001), more likely to live in urban areas (21.1 versus 12.4%, P < 0.001), less likely to have been currently or previously married (36.5 versus 45.8%, P < 0.001) and more likely to report multiple sexual partners (48.3 versus 41.6%, P = 0.05) and genital discharge (7.4 versus 4.4%, P = 0.03). At follow-up (post-SMC), behaviors and genital discharge did not differ between the groups. Genital ulcers were less reported among circumcised (6.8%) compared with uncircumcised men (10.5%; adjusted prevalence rate ratios = 0.60, 95% confidence interval = 0.42-0.87, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: In Rakai district, Uganda, the circumcision service program is attracting sexually active men at higher risk of HIV and we find no evidence of behavioral disinhibition following circumcision. The SMC program in this setting has the potential to reduce the HIV epidemic among men.
OBJECTIVES: Sub-Saharan African countries have substantially scaled-up safe male circumcision (SMC) services. However, it is unclear whether services are reaching men most at risk of HIV and whether there is behavioral disinhibition after SMC. We compared characteristics of SMC acceptors and nonacceptors in Rakai, Uganda. DESIGN: Cohort design. METHODS: Through the Rakai Community Cohort Study, baseline characteristics of 587 non-Muslim men who subsequently accepted SMC were compared with those of 4907 uncircumcised non-Muslim men. Behaviors after SMC were compared with those of men who remained uncircumcised. Poisson multivariable regression was used to estimate adjusted prevalence rate ratios of behaviors in circumcised versus uncircumcised men. RESULTS: At baseline (pre-SMC), men subsequently circumcised were younger (mean = 26.1 years), as compared with the uncircumcised (mean = 28.5 years, P < 0.001), more likely to live in urban areas (21.1 versus 12.4%, P < 0.001), less likely to have been currently or previously married (36.5 versus 45.8%, P < 0.001) and more likely to report multiple sexual partners (48.3 versus 41.6%, P = 0.05) and genital discharge (7.4 versus 4.4%, P = 0.03). At follow-up (post-SMC), behaviors and genital discharge did not differ between the groups. Genital ulcers were less reported among circumcised (6.8%) compared with uncircumcised men (10.5%; adjusted prevalence rate ratios = 0.60, 95% confidence interval = 0.42-0.87, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: In Rakai district, Uganda, the circumcision service program is attracting sexually active men at higher risk of HIV and we find no evidence of behavioral disinhibition following circumcision. The SMC program in this setting has the potential to reduce the HIV epidemic among men.
Authors: Ronald H Gray; Godfrey Kigozi; David Serwadda; Frederick Makumbi; Stephen Watya; Fred Nalugoda; Noah Kiwanuka; Lawrence H Moulton; Mohammad A Chaudhary; Michael Z Chen; Nelson K Sewankambo; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Melanie C Bacon; Carolyn F M Williams; Pius Opendi; Steven J Reynolds; Oliver Laeyendecker; Thomas C Quinn; Maria J Wawer Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-02-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert C Bailey; Stephen Moses; Corette B Parker; Kawango Agot; Ian Maclean; John N Krieger; Carolyn F M Williams; Richard T Campbell; Jeckoniah O Ndinya-Achola Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-02-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Xiangrong Kong; Godfrey Kigozi; Fred Nalugoda; Richard Musoke; Joseph Kagaayi; Carl Latkin; Robert Ssekubugu; Tom Lutalo; Betty Nantume; Iga Boaz; Maria Wawer; David Serwadda; Ronald Gray Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Ronald H Gray; David Serwadda; Aaron A R Tobian; Michael Z Chen; Frederick Makumbi; Tara Suntoke; Godfrey Kigozi; Fred Nalugoda; Boaz Iga; Thomas C Quinn; Lawrence H Moulton; Oliver Laeyendecker; Steven J Reynolds; Xiangrong Kong; Maria J Wawer Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Christine L Mattson; Richard T Campbell; Robert C Bailey; Kawango Agot; J O Ndinya-Achola; Stephen Moses Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Neema Nakyanjo; Danielle Piccinini; Alice Kisakye; Ping Teresa Yeh; William Ddaaki; Godfrey Kigozi; Ronald H Gray; Caitlin E Kennedy Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2018-07-16
Authors: Simon Peter Sebina Kibira; Lynn Muhimbuura Atuyambe; Ingvild Fossgard Sandøy; Fredrick Edward Makumbi; Marguerite Daniel Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Molly S Rosenberg; Francesc X Gómez-Olivé; Julia K Rohr; Kathleen Kahn; Till W Bärnighausen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 3.240