Literature DB >> 27203452

Teaching basic life support with an automated external defibrillator using the two-stage or the four-stage teaching technique.

Katrine Bjørnshave1,2, Lise Q Krogh1, Svend B Hansen1,3, Mette A Nebsbjerg1, Troels Thim4,5, Bo Løfgren1,5,6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laypersons often hesitate to perform basic life support (BLS) and use an automated external defibrillator (AED) because of self-perceived lack of knowledge and skills. Training may reduce the barrier to intervene. Reduced training time and costs may allow training of more laypersons. The aim of this study was to compare BLS/AED skills' acquisition and self-evaluated BLS/AED skills after instructor-led training with a two-stage versus a four-stage teaching technique.
METHODS: Laypersons were randomized to either two-stage or four-stage teaching technique courses. Immediately after training, the participants were tested in a simulated cardiac arrest scenario to assess their BLS/AED skills. Skills were assessed using the European Resuscitation Council BLS/AED assessment form. The primary endpoint was passing the test (17 of 17 skills adequately performed). A prespecified noninferiority margin of 20% was used.
RESULTS: The two-stage teaching technique (n=72, pass rate 57%) was noninferior to the four-stage technique (n=70, pass rate 59%), with a difference in pass rates of -2%; 95% confidence interval: -18 to 15%. Neither were there significant differences between the two-stage and four-stage groups in the chest compression rate (114±12 vs. 115±14/min), chest compression depth (47±9 vs. 48±9 mm) and number of sufficient rescue breaths between compression cycles (1.7±0.5 vs. 1.6±0.7). In both groups, all participants believed that their training had improved their skills.
CONCLUSION: Teaching laypersons BLS/AED using the two-stage teaching technique was noninferior to the four-stage teaching technique, although the pass rate was -2% (95% confidence interval: -18 to 15%) lower with the two-stage teaching technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 27203452     DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0969-9546            Impact factor:   2.799


  6 in total

1.  Three-Month Retention of Basic Life Support with an Automated External Defibrillator Using a Two-Stage versus Four-Stage Teaching Technique.

Authors:  Katrine Bjørnshave Bomholt; Lise Qvirin Krogh; Svend Rosendahl Bomholt; Mette Amalie Nebsbjerg; Troels Thim; Bo Løfgren
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Comparison of Long-Term Effects between Chest Compression-Only CPR Training and Conventional CPR Training on CPR Skills among Police Officers.

Authors:  Byung-Jun Cho; Seon-Rye Kim
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-02

Review 3.  Educational theory and its application to advanced life support courses: a narrative review.

Authors:  Andrew Lockey; Patricia Conaghan; Andrew Bland; Felicity Astin
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2020-12-28

4.  Basic Life-Support Learning in Undergraduate Students of Sports Sciences: Efficacy of 150 Minutes of Training and Retention after Eight Months.

Authors:  Silvia Aranda-García; Ernesto Herrera-Pedroviejo; Cristian Abelairas-Gómez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Bystander performance using the 2010 vs 2015 ERC guidelines: A post-hoc analysis of two randomised simulation trials.

Authors:  Dung Thuy Nguyen; Kasper Glerup Lauridsen; Kristian Krogh; Bo Løfgren
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-05-14

6.  Basic life support skills can be improved among certified basic life support instructors.

Authors:  Mathilde Stærk; Lauge Vammen; Camilla Fuchs Andersen; Kristian Krogh; Bo Løfgren
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-04-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.