Literature DB >> 2720327

A common pathophysiology for full thickness rectal prolapse, anterior mucosal prolapse and solitary rectal ulcer.

W M Sun1, N W Read, T C Donnelly, J J Bannister, A J Shorthouse.   

Abstract

Anorectal pressures at rest, during conscious contraction of the external sphincter, during serial distension of the rectum and during straining to inflate a balloon were measured in 56 patients (21 patients with full thickness rectal prolapse, 24 patients with anterior mucosal prolapse, 11 patients with solitary rectal ulcer) and in 30 normal subjects. Both basal and squeeze pressures were significantly lower in the three groups of patients compared with matched normal controls (P less than 0.05). During increases in intra-abdominal pressure, anal pressure remained above maximum rectal pressure (P less than 0.05) in normal controls, with the highest anal pressures being recorded in the most caudal anal channels. In contrast, anal pressures tended to be lower than rectal pressures during this manoeuvre in patients with rectal prolapse, anterior mucosal prolapse and solitary rectal ulcer, and the highest pressures were recorded in the channels nearest the rectum. During serial distension of the rectum, 64 per cent of patients with solitary rectal ulcer, 75 per cent with anterior mucosal prolapse and 76 per cent with rectal prolapse, but only 10 per cent of controls, showed repetitive rectal contractions. The highest anal pressure always remained higher than rectal pressure during rectal distension in normal subjects (P less than 0.05) but not in patients. The threshold rectal volume required to cause a desire to defaecate and the maximum tolerable volume were significantly lower (P less than 0.05) in each of the patient groups, compared with normal subjects. The similarity in the results from patients with rectal prolapse, anterior mucosal prolapse and solitary rectal ulcer support the hypothesis that they share a common pathophysiology. In each of the groups, the rectum is hypersensitive and hyper-reactive, and weakness of the anal sphincter creates the conditions for prolapse of the rectum to occur into or through the anal canal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2720327     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800760323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  14 in total

1.  Endosonography of the anal sphincters in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.

Authors:  S Halligan; A Sultan; G Rottenberg; C I Bartram
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Rectal prolapse: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  Kerry Hammond; David E Beck; David A Margolin; Charles B Whitlow; Alan E Timmcke; Terry C Hicks
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2007

3.  Rectal intussusception is associated with abnormal levator ani muscle structure and morphometry.

Authors:  N Rodrigo; K L Shek; H P Dietz
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Utility of a combined test of anorectal manometry, electromyography, and sensation in determining the mechanism of 'idiopathic' faecal incontinence.

Authors:  W M Sun; T C Donnelly; N W Read
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Complications and recurrence after excision of rectal internal mucosal prolapse for obstructed defaecation.

Authors:  M Pescatori; F Boffi; A Russo; A P Zbar
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Thickening of the internal anal sphincter in idiopathic constipation in children.

Authors:  Alireza S Keshtgar; Harry C Ward; Graham S Clayden; Ahmad Sanei
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Solitary rectal ulcer: the place of biofeedback and surgery in the treatment of the syndrome.

Authors:  N R Binnie; M Papachrysostomou; N Clare; A N Smith
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Solitary rectal ulcer and complete rectal prolapse: one condition or two?

Authors:  Y S Kang; M A Kamm; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Transrectal ultrasound study of the pathogenesis of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.

Authors:  M J Van Outryve; P A Pelckmans; H Fierens; Y M Van Maercke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Stavros Gourgiotis; Sotirios Baratsis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.