Literature DB >> 2720050

A Monte Carlo investigation of homogeneity tests of the odds ratio under various sample size configurations.

M P Jones1, T W O'Gorman, J H Lemke, R F Woolson.   

Abstract

Epidemiologic data for case-control studies are often summarized into K 2 x 2 tables. Given a fixed number of cases and controls, the degree of sparseness in the data depends on the number of strata, K. The effect of increasing stratification on size and power of seven tests of homogeneity of the odds ratio is studied using Monte Carlo methods. In all the designs considered here, the numbers of cases and controls per stratum are the same. Considering both size and power in non-sparse-data settings, we recommend the Breslow-Day statistic (1980, Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, 1. The Analysis of Case-Control Studies, p. 142; Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer) for general use. In sparse-data settings the T4 statistic of Liang and Self (1985, Biometrika 72, 353-358) performs the best when all tables, regardless of sample size, have odds ratios generated from the same distribution. In sparse-data settings characterized by a large table with an odds ratio of 1 and many small tables with odds ratios greater than 1, the T5 statistic of Liang and Self (1985) performs the best. One of the most important results of this study is the generally low power for all homogeneity tests especially when the data are sparse.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2720050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Meta-analysis as a tool for evaluation of evidence].

Authors:  A Koch; S Ziegler
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2000-02-15

2.  How reliable are the multiple comparison methods for odds ratio?

Authors:  Ayfer Ezgi Yilmaz
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 1.416

3.  Hypoadiponectinaemia and high risk of type 2 diabetes are associated with adiponectin-encoding (ACDC) gene promoter variants in morbid obesity: evidence for a role of ACDC in diabesity.

Authors:  F Vasseur; N Helbecque; S Lobbens; V Vasseur-Delannoy; C Dina; K Clément; P Boutin; T Kadowaki; P E Scherer; P Froguel
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Comparison of three tests of homogeneity of odds ratios in multicenter trials with unequal sample sizes within and among centers.

Authors:  Zahra Bagheri; Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi; Peyman Jafari
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Statistical analysis of K 2 x 2 tables: a comparative study of estimators/test statistics for association and homogeneity.

Authors:  T W O'Gorman; R F Woolson; M P Jones; J H Lemke
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  An accurate test for homogeneity of odds ratios based on Cochran's Q-statistic.

Authors:  Elena Kulinskaya; Michael B Dollinger
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.