BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation with fat injection is a growing trend in Japan. Many Japanese patients experiencing breast implant complications are requesting to have their breast implants removed and simultaneously exchanged with autologous fat injection. The keys of our simultaneous implant exchange with fat (SIEF) process are to embrace the "Coleman technique" and to carefully detach implant capsules when removing breast implants. Furthermore, we carefully inject fat to avoid necrosis. METHODS: Between January 2010 and January 2015, we investigated consecutively 131 Japanese patients whom we could follow up for over 6 months postsurgery. We ascertained the usefulness of SIEF by assessing changes in breast size, complications, and a satisfaction survey. RESULTS: There were no serious complications. We had experienced mild complications in 9.2% of patients (12/131). Partial fat necrosis with inflammation occurred in 2.3% of patients (3/131), seroma in the capsule in 3.1% (4/131), complaints of nodules (cysts, lumps) in 3.1% (4/131), and 1 hematoma patient (0.8%). At 6 months after surgery (n = 131), breast cup size (by Japanese Industrial Standards) had decreased by less than 1 cup size, despite SIEF. At 6 months, we performed a postsurgery satisfaction survey, and only 4% of the patients (5/131) were not satisfied with their surgery results. CONCLUSIONS: SIEF is a very safe and effective procedure. Breast implants removed with a low invasive traumatic approach and centrifuged fat injected with the "Coleman technique" are important principles in our practice. Furthermore, avoiding fat necrosis is one of the most important considerations, and our SIEF approach allows us to better control this potential complication during the surgical process.
BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation with fat injection is a growing trend in Japan. Many Japanese patients experiencing breast implant complications are requesting to have their breast implants removed and simultaneously exchanged with autologous fat injection. The keys of our simultaneous implant exchange with fat (SIEF) process are to embrace the "Coleman technique" and to carefully detach implant capsules when removing breast implants. Furthermore, we carefully inject fat to avoid necrosis. METHODS: Between January 2010 and January 2015, we investigated consecutively 131 Japanese patients whom we could follow up for over 6 months postsurgery. We ascertained the usefulness of SIEF by assessing changes in breast size, complications, and a satisfaction survey. RESULTS: There were no serious complications. We had experienced mild complications in 9.2% of patients (12/131). Partial fatnecrosis with inflammation occurred in 2.3% of patients (3/131), seroma in the capsule in 3.1% (4/131), complaints of nodules (cysts, lumps) in 3.1% (4/131), and 1 hematomapatient (0.8%). At 6 months after surgery (n = 131), breast cup size (by Japanese Industrial Standards) had decreased by less than 1 cup size, despite SIEF. At 6 months, we performed a postsurgery satisfaction survey, and only 4% of the patients (5/131) were not satisfied with their surgery results. CONCLUSIONS: SIEF is a very safe and effective procedure. Breast implants removed with a low invasive traumatic approach and centrifuged fat injected with the "Coleman technique" are important principles in our practice. Furthermore, avoiding fatnecrosis is one of the most important considerations, and our SIEF approach allows us to better control this potential complication during the surgical process.
Authors: Nicholas J Panetta; Deepak M Gupta; Matthew D Kwan; Derrick C Wan; George W Commons; Michael T Longaker Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Roger K Khouri; Gino Rigotti; Eufemiano Cardoso; Roger K Khouri; Thomas M Biggs Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Roger K Khouri; Gino Rigotti; Eufemiano Cardoso; Roger K Khouri; Thomas M Biggs Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.730