Literature DB >> 27199311

The effect of propofol on haemodynamics: cardiac output, venous return, mean systemic filling pressure, and vascular resistances.

F de Wit1, A L van Vliet2, R B de Wilde3, J R Jansen3, J Vuyk4, L P Aarts4, E de Jonge3, D P Veelo5, B F Geerts6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although arterial hypotension occurs frequently with propofol use in humans, its effects on intravascular volume and vascular capacitance are uncertain. We hypothesized that propofol decreases vascular capacitance and therefore decreases stressed volume.
METHODS: Cardiac output (CO) was measured using Modelflow(®) in 17 adult subjects after upper abdominal surgery. Mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) and vascular resistances were calculated using venous return curves constructed by measuring steady-state arterial and venous pressures and CO during inspiratory hold manoeuvres at increasing plateau pressures. Measurements were performed at three incremental levels of targeted blood propofol concentrations.
RESULTS: Mean blood propofol concentrations for the three targeted levels were 3.0, 4.5, and 6.5 µg ml(-1). Mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, MSFP, venous return pressure, Rv, systemic arterial resistance, and resistance of the systemic circulation decreased, stroke volume variation increased, and CO was not significantly different as propofol concentration increased.
CONCLUSIONS: An increase in propofol concentration within the therapeutic range causes a decrease in vascular stressed volume without a change in CO. The absence of an effect of propofol on CO can be explained by the balance between the decrease in effective, or stressed, volume (as determined by MSFP), the decrease in resistance for venous return, and slightly improved heart function. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register: NTR2486.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaesthetics, intravenous; cardiac output; propofol; vascular capacitance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27199311     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  28 in total

1.  Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes.

Authors:  Julian F Daza; Carolyn M Tan; Ryan J Fielding; Allison Brown; Forough Farrokhyar; Ilun Yang
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Arginase II polymorphisms modify the hypotensive responses to propofol by affecting nitric oxide bioavailability.

Authors:  Gustavo H Oliveira-Paula; Fernanda Borchers Coeli-Lacchini; Letícia Perticarrara Ferezin; Graziele C Ferreira; Lucas C Pinheiro; Waynice N Paula-Garcia; Luis V Garcia; Jose E Tanus-Santos; Riccardo Lacchini
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Non-cardiac surgery in patients with coronary artery disease: risk evaluation and periprocedural management.

Authors:  Davide Cao; Rishi Chandiramani; Davide Capodanno; Jeffrey S Berger; Matthew A Levin; Mary T Hawn; Dominick J Angiolillo; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  The impact of fluid optimisation before induction of anaesthesia on hypotension after induction.

Authors:  A I Khan; M Fischer; A C Pedoto; K Seier; K S Tan; G Dalbagni; S M Donat; V Arslan-Carlon
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  A newly developed anesthetic based on a unique chemical core.

Authors:  Noëlie S Cayla; Beza A Dagne; Yun Wu; Yao Lu; Larry Rodriguez; Daryl L Davies; Eric R Gross; Boris D Heifets; M Frances Davies; M Bruce MacIver; Edward J Bertaccini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes.

Authors:  Julian F Daza; Carolyn M Tan; Ryan J Fielding; Allison Brown; Forough Farrokhyar; Ilun Yang
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Cardiovascular Effects of Prone Positioning in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients: The Circulation Does Not Take It Lying Down.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Hemodynamic Management of Patients with Ejection Fraction < 50% Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Ablation.

Authors:  Aaron B Hesselson; Heather Hesselson
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2021-04-30

9.  Dantrolene versus amiodarone for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, double-blinded experimental study.

Authors:  Thomas Wiesmann; Dennik Freitag; Wolfgang Dersch; Daphne Eschbach; Marc Irqsusi; Thorsten Steinfeldt; Hinnerk Wulf; Carsten Feldmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Propofol decreases etomidate-related myoclonus in gastroscopy.

Authors:  Jinfeng Liu; Rongfang Liu; Chao Meng; Zhenhua Cai; Xiaoqi Dai; Chao Deng; Jiahang Zhang; Huacheng Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.